Author Topic: The New Northern Central  (Read 157475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

keeper

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1109
  • Too many thoughts...
  • Respect: +420
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #360 on: March 31, 2021, 04:23:57 AM »
0


(Attachment Link)

Where is that Leipzig number plate coming from?

Thomas  :D
Thomas

Ageing is inevitable - maturity is optional.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26058
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11526
    • Conrail 1285
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #361 on: March 31, 2021, 11:20:30 AM »
0
Where is that Leipzig number plate coming from?

Thomas  :D

Oh man, that used to be the front plate on my old Volvo when it was registered in PA.

Not sure if this will work.


C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11412
  • Respect: +2871
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #362 on: March 31, 2021, 11:26:46 AM »
0
Oh man, that used to be the front plate on my old Volvo when it was registered in PA.

Not sure if this will work.

It worked. Not so sure about that scanner antenna, tho' - too short for RR frequencies.  :facepalm:  :ashat:
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26058
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11526
    • Conrail 1285
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #363 on: March 31, 2021, 11:42:17 AM »
0
It worked. Not so sure about that scanner antenna, tho' - too short for RR frequencies.  :facepalm:  :ashat:

I disagree!

It was far better than the full length version that it had been before it was cut down.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11412
  • Respect: +2871
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #364 on: March 31, 2021, 12:15:39 PM »
0
If you mean by full-length, I think I recognize the base/magnet - was it originally a 5/8-wave ham antenna, ~4 feet long? If so, that particular design is notorious for narrow frequency response and they are fairly deaf outside of the design range. Again, if 5/8-wave, it should've been 42" for RR band.

If it was 1/4-wave, in untrimmed form it was likely to have been 22" and then resonant at 136 MHz, the upper end of the aircraft band. 161 MHz would put it at 18".

In either case, what you have there is what we call a "random wire" antenna <1/4-wave, which sometimes works OK, sometimes doesn't, depending on the receiver's "front end" and how well it tolerates impedance mismatch. In so many words, a random wire cut too short (but not way too short!) will work better than one that's too long.

Yeah, this is in the weeds. One of my "hats" was as an antenna designer. My specialty was direction-finding antennas. My working/test vehicle in the 1990s was a plain-jane white Explorer with steel wheels; it had 13 antennas on it. Even the local FCC official was impressed. Unintended, it was a hoot to merge onto a freeway and traffic would suddenly slow down. But I was hired on a couple of occasions by local PDs and other agencies to assist in locating stolen radios where some idiot thought it would be fun to get on their channel and raise hell.  :|
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26058
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11526
    • Conrail 1285
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #365 on: March 31, 2021, 02:06:48 PM »
0
If you mean by full-length, I think I recognize the base/magnet - was it originally a 5/8-wave ham antenna, ~4 feet long? If so, that particular design is notorious for narrow frequency response and they are fairly deaf outside of the design range. Again, if 5/8-wave, it should've been 42" for RR band.

If it was 1/4-wave, in untrimmed form it was likely to have been 22" and then resonant at 136 MHz, the upper end of the aircraft band. 161 MHz would put it at 18".

In either case, what you have there is what we call a "random wire" antenna <1/4-wave, which sometimes works OK, sometimes doesn't, depending on the receiver's "front end" and how well it tolerates impedance mismatch. In so many words, a random wire cut too short (but not way too short!) will work better than one that's too long.

Yeah, this is in the weeds. One of my "hats" was as an antenna designer. My specialty was direction-finding antennas. My working/test vehicle in the 1990s was a plain-jane white Explorer with steel wheels; it had 13 antennas on it. Even the local FCC official was impressed. Unintended, it was a hoot to merge onto a freeway and traffic would suddenly slow down. But I was hired on a couple of occasions by local PDs and other agencies to assist in locating stolen radios where some idiot thought it would be fun to get on their channel and raise hell.  :|

Haha. What you're actually looking at is the "$20 Radio-Shack Special" with one of the sections removed because someone said "it works better". In all the years of using it it's actually done ok. I actually have no idea where it is anymore, and I've been thinking about a replacement, but I also am nervous about hurting the paint of my current "instant classic".

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12335
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8561
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #366 on: March 31, 2021, 02:14:28 PM »
0
@Ed Kapuscinski,

I just received that new Diamond RH77CA antenna for my old Radio Shack scanner.  I can't wait to get out there and see if it makes any difference.

DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11412
  • Respect: +2871
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #367 on: March 31, 2021, 02:20:10 PM »
0
OK, now I get it. There was a cheap brand of ham antennas that used the same base. Yeah, those RS jobbies were crap. You eliminated the center coil, which detuned the whole works so it would favor the 450 MHz police bands at the expense of "hi-band". Great for picking-up FREDs, tho'.  :D  It worked OK with the mod because there was also a coil in the bottom, so the resonant length of the whip+coil was in the ballpark. Sort of like rubber-duck antennas on walkie-talkies.

Fear of scratching the paint with the magnet? Pish-posh! Those 13 antennae on my Explorer were drilled mounts! No fear!  :trollface:

... Diamond RH77CA ...

Full geek mode!   :P
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26058
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11526
    • Conrail 1285
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #368 on: March 31, 2021, 02:23:14 PM »
0
OK, now I get it. There was a cheap brand of ham antennas that used the same base. Yeah, those RS jobbies were crap. You eliminated the center coil, which detuned the whole works so it would favor the 450 MHz police bands at the expense of "hi-band". Great for picking-up FREDs, tho'.  :D  It worked OK with the mod because there was also a coil in the bottom, so the resonant length of the whip+coil was in the ballpark. Sort of like rubber-duck antennas on walkie-talkies.

Fear of scratching the paint with the magnet? Pish-posh! Those 13 antennae on my Explorer were drilled mounts! No fear!  :trollface:

Full geek mode!   :P

Haha, yeah. But from what I understand, there might only be about 1000 copies of my Shark floating around out there, so I want to keep the speed hole applications to a minimum.

And Dave just got the same antenna I use on mine too when hand held. So far I've got no complaints.

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6812
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1736
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #369 on: March 31, 2021, 02:37:10 PM »
+1
Haha, yeah. But from what I understand, there might only be about 1000 copies of my Shark floating around out there, so I want to keep the speed hole applications to a minimum.

And Dave just got the same antenna I use on mine too when hand held. So far I've got no complaints.



Just get one of those sheets that go between hamburger patties or cheese and use that between the magnetic base and the car.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


CRL

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2345
  • Needs More Dirt.
  • Respect: +643
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #370 on: March 31, 2021, 02:44:50 PM »
0
Ah... Brings back memories we used to go on back in the 60’s as part of our county civil defense group using 20 meter band radios. One guy would set up a stationary broadcast somewhere in the county on a public accessible spot, then at an appointed time, would begin broadcasting, but only if the “hunters” were able to keep him talking.

A favorite technique was to park the transmitter vehicle on a railroad crossing because the signal tended to spread out down the tracks in each direction making it harder to get a fix.

Great fun.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11412
  • Respect: +2871
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #371 on: March 31, 2021, 02:55:08 PM »
0
Have you guys seen one of these?:



Sort of obvious, a mag-mount for hand-helds. Works great with that Diamond whip. (Though still a magnet, Ed.  :(  )  Easy to pack for trips where we have to rely on rental cars. Available here.

Ah... Brings back memories we used to go on back in the 60’s as part of our county civil defense group using 20 meter band radios. One guy would set up a stationary broadcast somewhere in the county on a public accessible spot, then at an appointed time, would begin broadcasting, but only if the “hunters” were able to keep him talking.

A favorite technique was to park the transmitter vehicle on a railroad crossing because the signal tended to spread out down the tracks in each direction making it harder to get a fix.

Great fun.

I was no fun (for the others) on "foxhunts", as they were called. My equipment and software would find the "fox" in the time it took to drive there. It got to the point where the designated foxes were doing things specifically in attempts to foil my techniques. Didn't work.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

keeper

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1109
  • Too many thoughts...
  • Respect: +420
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #372 on: March 31, 2021, 02:58:21 PM »
0
That Volvo rocks.
Not like a SAAB, but cool enough.

Thomas  :)
Thomas

Ageing is inevitable - maturity is optional.

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13997
  • Respect: +4178
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #373 on: March 31, 2021, 03:15:30 PM »
0
If he does do full ctc with a JMRI interface then it is theoretically possible to have the through trains run on automated routines while the single operator handles the locals.

I use CATS with JMRI -- I have two panels built .. one for CTC, and the other for APB-2 .. so when I just want to run trains myself, the signals just work without me interfering .. the JMRI automation stuff is just too hard for a large layout -- time wise to set up

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26058
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11526
    • Conrail 1285
Re: The New Northern Central
« Reply #374 on: March 31, 2021, 04:36:55 PM »
0
That Volvo rocks.
Not like a SAAB, but cool enough.

Thomas  :)

I know. It's the one I regret letting get away. I had a lot of fun in that thing.

To this day, if I wanted a bespoke resto-mod it'd be that car with the heated/ventilated seats from my current ride, some modern infotainment, and an LS under the hood.