Author Topic: BLI Watch  (Read 84262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4370
  • Respect: +1267
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #345 on: July 25, 2016, 06:54:21 PM »
0
Quote
Maybe they decided that Pennsy steam doesn't sell well and will now concentrate on Western steam?

I'd settle for the same mechanism with a boiler that did not shout "Pennsylvania Railroad," even if it was not prototype specific.

List of steam I would spend $300 on is pretty small, and would depend on my having $300 "just laying around."
GTW 4-8-4
GTW 4-8-2
ATSF Hudson that is not a Blue Goose
maybe an ATSF 4-8-4 (upgraded from the Bachmann boiler and detailing) or 2-10-4... just because
Tom D.

I gave up rivet counting when I couldn't see an N scale rivet anymore.

muktown128

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Respect: +166
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #346 on: July 25, 2016, 10:19:03 PM »
0
A PRR J1 2-10-4 would be a good choice!
There were more of those on the PRR roster than M1a/M1b's.
The 2-10-4's could be offered in other roads as well and with a large tender for the speaker.

Scott

reinhardtjh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3153
  • Respect: +423
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #347 on: July 26, 2016, 08:05:47 AM »
0
A PRR J1 2-10-4 would be a good choice!
There were more of those on the PRR roster than M1a/M1b's.
The 2-10-4's could be offered in other roads as well and with a large tender for the speaker.

Scott

I was going to disagree, but I realized you are not counting the 201 M1's so, yes, you are correct.  The 65 J1 and 60 J1a class locomotives grouped as one do outnumber the 100 M1a/b's.  Since the only real difference between the J1 and J1a's is pretty much invisible you can count them as one whereas the M1 and M1a/b's had some major visual differences and some others that would be harder to distinguish.

In any case a PRR J1 would be a decent choice since BLI could also use nearly everything to also create a C&O T1, needing only to change the pilot and cab for the most part.  Both the Pennsy and C&O used large tenders so if it's true that BLI needs a certain tender size for the Paragon 2/3 decoder, then that would also be a point in favor.

I'm not sure how close the drive train is to the other large-drivered Texas types used by the AT&SF or T&P
John H. Reinhardt
PRRT&HS #8909
C&O HS #11530
N-Trak #7566

garethashenden

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2327
  • Respect: +1819
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #348 on: July 26, 2016, 08:41:59 AM »
+1
Maybe they decided that Pennsy steam doesn't sell well and will now concentrate on Western steam?
 :trollface:

Not even western. How about a nice new 0-6-0? Everyone had them and the Bachmann model leaves a lot to be desired.

djconway

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 487
  • Respect: +76
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #349 on: July 26, 2016, 08:31:06 PM »
+2
NOT watching BLI any more, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2016, 09:42:05 PM by djconway »

Specter3

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 929
  • Respect: +229
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #350 on: July 26, 2016, 09:26:45 PM »
0
Heavy Pacific. 78 in drivers or so. ATSF 3400 class would be ok with me. And don't tell me Bachmann will do one because I have too many of their slipping gear, popping pin, steam locos as it is. Or if you want to be a little esoteric how about a large drivered Atlantic?

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3738
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +648
    • The Modern PRR
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #351 on: July 26, 2016, 10:34:11 PM »
+1
NOT watching BLI any more, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

And I wonder how much BLI realizes that this will be the case going forward. If we don't know what's schlock and what's proto realistic, why preorder?
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1014
    • Facebook Profile
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #352 on: October 13, 2016, 04:18:41 PM »
0
http://www.broadway-limited2.com/ProductGuide2016-17/


PAGE 90, N SCALE T1
PAGE 102 N SCALE GG1    <--theres an early Futura Goldleaf scheme!
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 19566
  • Respect: +6883
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #353 on: October 13, 2016, 04:59:10 PM »
+1
Sound equipped kids shoes  :facepalm:

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1014
    • Facebook Profile
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #354 on: October 13, 2016, 07:46:54 PM »
+2
Sound equipped kids shoes  :facepalm:

So, again...and Chris, this isn't directed at you even though I am quoting you but I know others will have the same opinion, I don't get the hate for things like this. It may seem silly for us, super serial modelers, who wish to see R&D dollars invested in trains instead of thunder, lightning, and shoes, but there is a market out there for this stuff. What harm could it do? I'm sure BLI wants to make as much money as possible. Let them take a risk and see if they are profitable. Profits lead to more products.
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26047
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11503
    • Conrail 1285
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #355 on: October 13, 2016, 08:00:32 PM »
+2
So, again...and Chris, this isn't directed at you even though I am quoting you but I know others will have the same opinion, I don't get the hate for things like this. It may seem silly for us, super serial modelers, who wish to see R&D dollars invested in trains instead of thunder, lightning, and shoes, but there is a market out there for this stuff. What harm could it do? I'm sure BLI wants to make as much money as possible. Let them take a risk and see if they are profitable. Profits lead to more products.

You KNOW I'm getting Gino a pair...

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12233
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11664
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #356 on: October 13, 2016, 08:52:45 PM »
+3
I would have loved shoes like that as a kid.  Right before I got beaten up.

That said, I'm cautiously optimistic here.  I don't really need any F units (unless they're demonstrably better than the IM Fs which are great locomotives), but that T1 is absolutely on the want list.  Hell, that might keep me from going On30!

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 19566
  • Respect: +6883
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #357 on: October 13, 2016, 08:57:56 PM »
+1
I don't have a problem with the shoes, it's just funny to me the way they shove sound down our throats.

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2871
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #358 on: October 13, 2016, 09:12:48 PM »
0
Mount a a half dozen pairs of shoes around a bike tire ...............


Richie Dost

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3738
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +648
    • The Modern PRR
Re: BLI Watch
« Reply #359 on: October 13, 2016, 09:25:17 PM »
0
New road numbers for the M1a's! GG-1s with sound in road numbers other than 4935! Boxcab P5's!

Wait... the P5's are HO... [string of expletives removed]ers getting my hopes up!

:D

I'm torn on the T1's. I've never been a fan of the late de-skirted look, although it's probably the most accurate for the most time periods, especially later. I may pass and hold out hope for the partially-skirted version. If they do that, I'll probably spring for one.

Still plenty of my money headed to BLI when these come out.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2016, 10:28:03 PM by eric220 »
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com