0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
But back to stupid stuff Kato does - I know... For example in the AC4400 line, they did the singularly least common version of the unit (ex-CNW) for UP - which could only be used in the most unusual paint schemes - and on a unit that was renumbered soon after it was on the roster.
;DGood question Chuck, but they have already done correct AC44 and -9 for all those of those roads.
But here I am in the middle of Conrail territory complaining about Kato dissing western roads... At least the Canadiens are happy:
Just waiting for the FVM CP Gevos here, would rather give my money to a manufacturer that worries about details and phases.
Quote from: SirTainly on October 23, 2009, 09:59:29 AMJust waiting for the FVM CP Gevos here, would rather give my money to a manufacturer that worries about details and phases.Quoted because it should be repeated. (and tacked to Kato's door)
Quote from: SirTainly on October 23, 2009, 09:59:29 AMJust waiting for the FVM CP Gevos here, would rather give my money to a manufacturer that worries about details and phases.The FVM CP GEVO is actually wrong for most of CP GEVOS. The number board are in the wrong places.
Quote from: sundowner on October 23, 2009, 11:31:23 AMQuote from: SirTainly on October 23, 2009, 09:59:29 AMJust waiting for the FVM CP Gevos here, would rather give my money to a manufacturer that worries about details and phases.The FVM CP GEVO is actually wrong for most of CP GEVOS. The number board are in the wrong places.Can't talk in absolutes when that road has not been announced yet:)http://foxvalleymodels.com/pics.htmlWas supposed to be a surprise for later....well "Surprise"