0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The hoppers, they're nice, and fit my modeling era, but I'm conflicted. I have three of the carbon cars and they are fine, fine models, but only one has levitated from the workbench to the layout after receiving its MTL True Scale Couplers. I confirmed with Blaine at our recent RPM they are going to continue tooling 1015-shank-compatible coupler pockets integrated into the frame castings, and don't plan any change to that philosophy. Seeing the pre-production models in person, installing TSC will be a big project with a fair amount of potential for damage carving the car up to make them work.So my dilemma is supporting somebody who I believe is making a quality product where I can do my small bit to contribute to their success, or waste a fair bit of money on what will be bench queens that take a lot of time and effort to modify to my modeling/operating preferences, where both money and time are resources highly useful elsewhere.
For what it's worth (IMO) - If MT wants the TSC grow to a 'Proto 160' type solution, they need to produce a TSC with a 1015 shank (with or without slinky).. and I sent some design ideas to @Shipsure.. Maybe sales have really fallen off for TSC couplers since the initial release - but as big of a hit as it was when it started, I'm surprised they didn't follow up with a more universal solution.~Ian
Isn't IM making the EXACT same car? That should have an easy mount for TSC.