Author Topic: An N-Possible journal  (Read 35656 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6757
  • Respect: +2627
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #270 on: January 08, 2026, 01:34:54 AM »
+1
Walthers Ballast Hoppers, drilled, tapped, and installed the SBX-101, no top hat. Pay no attention to the fact I shortened the car by chopping 10’ out of the middle.

...and substantially improved the end cages as well.  Nice job!

MILWcoastdiv

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: +26
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #271 on: January 09, 2026, 11:16:43 PM »
+17
Atlas GP40 replacement coupler box 3d printed using short shank.  .stl belolw.   

https://www.tinkercad.com/things/9RTSs22dP6c-atlas-coupler-box?sharecode=X6MkIuG5qrP3DcHNWDKy8DbVaQRhGG2_B4xEY-GKvwI

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3825
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #272 on: January 10, 2026, 12:46:57 PM »
0

sizemore

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2778
  • Respect: +143
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #273 on: January 10, 2026, 12:53:13 PM »
0

Thompson Sub: Instagram | Youtube | Website

Jimbo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Respect: +92
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #274 on: January 11, 2026, 05:26:21 PM »
+4
BACHMANN Alco 2-6-0

Wow, this one was an adventure!  I came into this fight woefully unprepared for the battle that I would face.  In the end, I succeeded.  However, this was probably above my experience level (although I think I can say that the experience has made me stronger!)

Bottom Line Up Front: I used short shank scalebox (modified) for both front and rear coupler.

Let's start with the reason I was unprepared.  Looking over the model, it appeared to be a straightforward conversion using a Universal Conversion for both front and rear.  The reason is that the front and rear both had coupler pockets with screwed on lids.  Below are photos of both (I removed the lid to the rear coupler prior to taking the photo.)








Should be easy, right?  Drop in the spring splitter, drop in the universal coupler, screw the lid back on, and we're on our way, ready to pull freight!!   Well, NOT SO FAST!

Unfortunately, the Bachmann coupler, despite being massively oversized, has a very thin shank.  Because of this, when you screw down the lid, the tolerances are such that they essentially clamp down on the N-Possible coupler.  So, instead of having a nice, quick, easy conversion, I had a good-looking but useless coupler at each end of the locomotive.  I had to re-think this.

I started with the pilot, because I thought this would be easier to work on, since removal of the pilot is straightforward.  Disassembling the coupler assembly that I had just installed, along with the metal spring splitter, it appeared that the cause of the tightness was in fact flashing where the coupler rests.  So, I grabbed a file and filed it as smooth as practical:



That worked a little better.  Still not optimal.  I played around with it as best as I could, and got it to kinda-sorta work.  A little better, but still tight.  Operation was not smooth; on top of this, it was measuring a bit low.  There HAD to be a better way.



I set this aside for a bit to work on the other (tender) coupler.  THAT one should be easy, right?  NOPE.  Same problem.  Using the universal conversion, the coupler is too tight.  Looking it over, the box lid that was included could never work; the height of the center post and sides of the coupler box (which the lid rests on) are too short.  There HAD to be another option.

Looking over my parts bin, I thought - "What if I took a Scalebox floor and filed down the post ALMOST flat?  This might give me a bit more room in the box, and I would then also no longer need the splitter."  So, out comes the file, and I started filing down:



This solution was successful!  I went back and forth to ensure that I filed enough without taking off too much.  In the end, I had a nub of a center post on the Scalebox.  But it worked AND it worked very well!  (I did need to apply some PVA glue strategically to keep the box in place.  But once I figured this out, I was completely satisfied with the result, both on height and performance:
 




With this in mind, I decided to use this same approach on the pilot.
(ASIDE: The pilot is a bit unique in that the center post is also used to house the entirety of the screw threads.  Meaning, if you remove the center post, you'll have to drill a hole THROUGH the pilot and leave an unsightly hole in your pilot.  So removing the center post wasn't something that I really wanted to do.)

The only issue I had with following this same approach with the pilot is that the hole for the coupler is fairly tall.  I needed to install the Scalebox bottom such that it slid into this hole as well.  However, the scalebox plus coupler shank is smaller than the thickness of the original coupler with coupler lid.  I needed to add a very thin shim to ensure that the coupler wouldn't "droop."  I used a small rectangle of construction paper; that did the trick.  Once again, some strategically applied PVA helps hold everything in place.

Here's the final result:  (And - not sure why the scalebox appears crooked in the photo.  It really isn't crooked at all.  I think some of the shadows and glue give it an appearance of being crooked.)



This was a complex installation, but manageable by modelers of at least intermediate skill.  The biggest lesson I learned is that things aren't always as straightforward as they initially appear.  But, I am glad I had a chance to learn from this and hope that this helps other modelers with similar installations going forward.

And - in my opinion, the Scalebox (and the N-Possible couplers overall) are both magnificently engineered!  I appreciate the time that @turbowhiz put in to ensuring that these would be the best they could be before release!

Regards,
Jim

« Last Edit: January 11, 2026, 07:53:58 PM by Jimbo »

turbowhiz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 356
  • https://n-possible.com
  • Respect: +740
    • N-Possible
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #275 on: January 12, 2026, 09:55:11 AM »
+3
Great work @Jimbo ! Thank you for your kind words and support.

It’s so cool to see these out in the wild and what people are able to do with them. I have to say I’ve learned more then a few things myself reading this thread, the creativity and “out of the box” thinking here is inspiring!

I’ve got some new stuff in the hopper that’s going to really make a lot of locomotive conversions easier, and another surprise or two beyond that.

I have steam locomotive pilot coupler plans as well, I’m actively trying to source the right parts to bring that vision to reality.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11833
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #276 on: January 12, 2026, 11:20:53 AM »
0
Atlas GP40 replacement coupler box 3d printed using short shank.  .stl belolw.   

https://www.tinkercad.com/things/9RTSs22dP6c-atlas-coupler-box?sharecode=X6MkIuG5qrP3DcHNWDKy8DbVaQRhGG2_B4xEY-GKvwI

(Attachment Link)

To echo what others said, this is sweeeeeeet!  8) I just need to find a place that will print these.


delamaize

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2637
  • Gender: Male
  • Prairie Line Native
  • Respect: +950
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #277 on: January 12, 2026, 11:39:29 AM »
0
Man, The more I see these conversions, the more I want to make it happen!

I think with me, I'm going to be doing my passenger fleet first, as that is actually doable in a reasonable time period.
Then in the future, I will probably convert everything else. But both of these will be down the road, and not anytime soon. Way too many projects as of now.
Mike
Skookumchuck Belt Line Founder

Northern Pacific, Tacoma Division, 4th subdivision "The Prarie Line" (still in planning stages)

turbowhiz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 356
  • https://n-possible.com
  • Respect: +740
    • N-Possible
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #278 on: January 12, 2026, 12:03:13 PM »
+3
To echo what others said, this is sweeeeeeet!  8) I just need to find a place that will print these.

The upcoming locomotive boxes are a very similar design, albeit in a slightly more generic form. But the concept is the same, fills the pilot hole. They have top lid rather then a bottom lid, but I need to do it that way to accommodate Kato use cases with the same base box part.

Everyone will have a readily available option very soon!

Jimbo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Respect: +92
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #279 on: January 12, 2026, 12:03:32 PM »
0
Man, The more I see these conversions, the more I want to make it happen!

I think with me, I'm going to be doing my passenger fleet first, as that is actually doable in a reasonable time period.
Then in the future, I will probably convert everything else. But both of these will be down the road, and not anytime soon. Way too many projects as of now.
Mike,

Not sure if you’ve experimented with these yet, but if not, I recommend you try out some of the more straightforward conversions on freight cars first.  The coupler assembly process itself can be challenging at first; after doing a few it becomes easier.

I personally started with Micro Trains freight cars (20000-series box cars); there’s already a hole present in the underframe that simply needs to be tapped.  Scalebox with hat usually gets it spot-on for height.  Probably the simplest conversions I’ve done.

The passenger cars I have are mostly Kato; I’m personally holding off on those for two reasons:  it doesn’t appear that there is anything (dimple or hole) in the underframe to properly locate a screw hole; and I’ve noticed that the Kato couplers on the passenger equipment will actually mate with N-Possible (so no compatibility issues to drive urgency to convert.)

Please share your experiences!

Jim

Jimbo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Respect: +92
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #280 on: January 12, 2026, 12:09:02 PM »
0
I have steam locomotive pilot coupler plans as well, I’m actively trying to source the right parts to bring that vision to reality.
I have a couple more steam locos to convert; next in line is a Bachmann 4-6-0.  That one will be even more challenging than the 2-6-0.

The ones I’m not ready to tackle yet are the Bachmann 4-8-2 pilot (original, with the fixed dummy coupler) and the Bachmann 2-8-0 pilot (same issue - dummy coupler.). I’m also a little leery of attempting the BLI USRA steamers as well.

Looking forward to seeing what you have coming up!

Jim

turbowhiz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 356
  • https://n-possible.com
  • Respect: +740
    • N-Possible
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #281 on: January 12, 2026, 12:10:14 PM »
+2
Arnold SW-1

I got my hands a couple of these gems at the NSE convention last year, and just got around to documenting the install now.

101-URS conversion, with some straightforward box mods.

The box has a back that needs to be removed for clearance. I used a belt sander here, makes sort and precise worse of it, but you can cut it out with a knife too.



Note that there is a lot of flash and raised edges around the ejector pin points. You really need to clean those up in this box.
The URS shim is glued into the box.




Entirely file the bottom ring off the retainer shank. For this install, leave the entire URS retainer post extension in place.



You also will need to thin the top lid of the box top as well; The coupler fits tightly in this box, so carefully remove material until it doesn’t bind. Attention to detail on the shim install is also critical. These are amongst the thinner boxes I’ve ever encountered, and their state of flash and subtle imperfections re-enforces my thoughts about injection molding being inferior for this sort of product. 


 
Spot on height. The factory box is scale sized or at least really close to scale sized. The cut bar ends up in the perfect spot. These are a great conversion on a fantastic model!



Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9023
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1791
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #282 on: January 12, 2026, 01:10:17 PM »
0
Anyone care to hazard a guess on the conversion for the new Atlas U36B?
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


turbowhiz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 356
  • https://n-possible.com
  • Respect: +740
    • N-Possible
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #283 on: January 12, 2026, 02:05:45 PM »
0
Anyone care to hazard a guess on the conversion for the new Atlas U36B?

Today, a 101-URS in the Atlas box. Tomorrow, a 101-LBX with a thick lid, replacing the factory box. As far as I can tell looking at pictures it’s the same Accumate 1015 type box as other Atlas releases.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6757
  • Respect: +2627
Re: An N-Possible journal
« Reply #284 on: January 12, 2026, 04:50:52 PM »
0
The box has a back that needs to be removed for clearance. I used a belt sander here, makes sort and precise worse of it, but you can cut it out with a knife too.

Honestly?  A belt sander?  How in the world... :?