0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Sounds like you are making an argument against your own statement. I never said it was oil (I said steam). You were the one who stated "It's lubricating oil residue.".Whatever. . . It is a rusty-color residue. And I'm working hard on my post count (your idea too), but I don't think I'll make it in time.
Sux that they had to put a diesel behind it. Very cool to see 4014 under steam!
They always put a diesel behind it for dynamic braking
... the rear engine on 4014 isn't powered. Not one video shows any steam exiting the cylinder cocks and you only hear the chuff on the front engine and the rod knock on the rear. ...
I guess I don't understand the antagonism toward diesels. They were a natural progression for the railroads. A business MUST do what's necessary to STAY in business. The manual labor involved in maintaining steam locomotives was incredible. Look what it takes just to get ONE running, these days. And this was done on a daily basis before diesels.To me, being alongside diesels as they rev up to get a train moving is just as exciting as being beside a steamer.And, don't get me wrong. Seeing 4014 actually running is a very emotional thing. Imagine what it will be like, once they get the issues resolved.Doug
I love diesels. Much more than steam. Either one of those steam locos should easily handle such a tiny train on their own though.
Check this video at 5:30 or so. Steam definitely from the rear engine cylinder cocks: />
Every video I see and hear the same thing. The right cylinder on 844 has a seal leak and the rear engine on 4014 isn't powered. Not one video shows any steam exiting the cylinder cocks and you only hear the chuff on the front engine and the rod knock on the rear. When you think you see steam from there it's actually the pipe in front of the cylinder dropping water. This is only my very uneducated observation though and could be very wrong.