0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thanks!I presume MT's mate with MT reasonably well...How does Atlas fit into the picture?
Lou,The MT 53-ft and 48-ft containers work well together, but will not work at all with containers that are a scale 96 inches wide.The Atlas containers appear to be deliberately designed to have the distance between the pins slightly greater than the distance between the holes. This allows the containers to "snap" firmly together so there is no need for magnets....
I thought the proto does have pins. They just aren't a scale 6" long
Coming Soon to N scale to help with container compatibility issues: JTC Replacement underframes:For Scale Trains 53' dry and reefer boxes - JTC replacement Underframes have 3 magnets as per JTC system AND connecting PINS to match the JTC/Atlas ISO boxes.For M-T 48' and 53' boxes - replacement underframes to have 3 magnets as per JTC system. (Remove existing PINS)Atlas 40' standard height box - replacement underframe to have three magnets as per JTC system (PINS already align)These will allow compatibility of the above to stack ON top of All the JTC containers (40' canvas/open tops, 40' HC and (2)-20' standard containers, +++), and the Atlas 40' standard containers. M-T containers will need to have their 'pins' removed, and connect via magnets only. Expect these in March/April. https://www.facebook.com/JTCmodeltrains/The compatible JTC Magnetic system will be used on the all appropriate JTC containers in the developing product line. Consideration is being given to include metal top plates in the package(s).BR,SteveJTC Product Development
Steve,This is a great step in the right direction for creating an industry standard for the placement of magnets in N scale containers!And, I would like to suggest you consider a container chassis (or four) as you develop your product line. YES (3)As you know, no one is currently producing ready to use North American prototype container chassis. Chassis King includes a lot of specs on their website. http://www.chassisking.com/products/container-chassis/ We have a N.A. Prototype ...If you do decide to produce a container chassis, I would also suggest that the wheels and axles be interchangeable with Trainworx wheels and axles. A two-hole Budd would be nice since Trainworx doesn't make that one, so you would not be reinventing the wheel, so to speak. Good SuggestionOne last request would be for a 48-foot corrugated container. The APL and Pacer stack trains from the latter part of the 1990s into the first decade of the 21st Century had a lot of these, but I have not been able to locate any in N scale. YESThanks for listening! Thank You for the input and suggestions....