Is Tichy's ink jet decal rig (or rather ink jet printers in general) perfect for all N scale decal applications? No. But isn't that unrealistic to expect?
In all fairness, Pete, aren't you're painting this new N offering with a hyper critical O scale brush?
Given inkjet is the future and Alps seems to be headed to the RIP track ... perhaps we should try to be a tad more constructive. After all, some of this (ink lay for example) may be adjustable to current rigs, and other issues (carrier thickness) might just require a different stock to print on. And finally, for the remaining issues, we should highlight them as they are ripe areas for printer makers to improve.
Now obviously, it's fully appropriate to critically review Tichy's product here. And yes, if you see CYM shadowing in black (K) elements, as is seen on the Archer set, by all means do mention it. But only showing the Archer rivet set (where build up & shadow is the very desire)? Such isn't fair to ink jet decals in general nor Tichy's effort specifically.
I suspect you might not have a fine black text set, so allow me.
Below are some of Don's black ink decal (from his PFE R-40-2 set #9024B). Honestly, can you see ANY CYM shadow of the black here? I certainly can't. This was taken with my highest macro (10x) on my best SLR in daylight.
IMHO, this set FAAAAR exceeds the 3 foot rule. Or even a 3 centimeter standard of us proud n scale rivet counters.
What I can see are well defined text in the classic freight car data block. And actually, it looks better in person than on my PC's LED screen, given some dithering of the pixels on my monitor. I can read at ease without magnification.
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Next let's compare it to what Microscales produces for their recent PFE set (60-4240, a set they have been tweaking and correcting for decades). (same focus & zoom) What I see in person is less defined text, including places where parts of the letter just didn't print. (Lower bar on the capital "L" in "LBS". Parts of the number 8, 5, 0, etc are missing) And this is on a fresh sheet. Still fine - perhaps even better for a heavily weathered car, but not as built or just washed & repainted.
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Yes, the text ink is thicker, the carrier film may be thicker, and the UV cured ink might require a different setting solution and process than you use with other decals. (Big thanks Joe
@Shipsure for your tip on taming them - let's keep those ideas coming.) But it seems this artwork might also just be designed a tad beefier.
For both Tichy & Miscoscales, the 9" prototype RoadMark PFE is to scale, but the Microscale" kerning of the letters (not shown) seems too close when I compare it to prototype builders pics in Thompson's classic Pacific Fruit Express and to lettering diagrams in the new (and EXCELLENT!) Southern Pacific Freight Car Painting and Lettering Guide by Harley & Thompson w/ Signor.
Using my ol' Starrett Vernier micrometer caliper, I have The Tichy backer paper, adhesive and carrier film at a dead 0.0090" and over the datablock, a 0.0100". So a black only ink height is just 0.001"
The Microscale set, the backer paper to carrier is 0.0065", over data block, 0.0071". So 0.0006.... yes, the Tichy's (more legible) ink is 0.0004" thicker than the Microscales. But it's not ink build up that draws my eye.
The Tichy backer paper / adhesive & carrier, is also clearly thicker. Some of this may be irrelevant as it could be that Tichy uses a thicker backer, but it could be a thicker carrier which might account for issue of curl. And if this is a real issue, it may be fixable for Don to switch to a finer stock on which to print.
Now, where the thickness of ink does become an issue for Tichy (and perhaps inkjets in general - and likely also built up dry transfers like that of Clover House) is on multi color / multi layer elements.
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
What I do not like is "the bleed" seen best on the Tichy version of the SP logo, likely from dithering of the black over layer into the white ink underlayer. The result is white text elements ("Southern Pacific" text) that is far too narrow, and clearly inferior to the Microscale's SP logo. But again, Tichy might be able to adjust this art work to make less black so more white text shows through (just like Microscales did the opposite adjustment from their "too much white" 60-4021 set).
And if Don is reading this, as they tweak the black ink, he should also correct the size of his SP & UP logo's which seem a smidgen under the scale (The SP logo was 45" high scale). This is a noticeable issue (compared to say the Atlas & MTL RTR and the corrected Microscales).
What about thickness of ink on these logos, you say?
On the UP Logo, Tichy is a net 0.0035" while the Microscales is 0.0009". Yep, thicker. Less likely to, say, conform into the board of a woodside reefer.
HOWEVER - at least in this instance - I LOVE ME SOME THICK!
In fact I'd love to see them add Archer like screw heads around the edge of both logos too! For PFE cars of this era didn't have painted logos. They were actually porcelain signs screwed to the reefer side.
There's always a prototype!

Bottomline: I'm very pleased to see Tichy wade into this area just as some (ex., Rail Graphics) are closing shop. I do like his fine text, single ink data blocks for scale 2" and less, and like them more than Microscale. For up to 1/4" nominal (scale 40") text single ink, it seems a tie to me. For anything larger where you want the decal to conform, especially mutlicolor multilayer, I don't have enough experience with the Tichy decals to have an opinion, and am hopeful tweaks can be made either with our technique or his product.
-Jake
PS: Now.... Tichy ? When you fix your PFE set, also PLEASE also CORRECT for your set to the right UP "System" Logo for your prototype. You have a license and I've sent the artwork. And it has NEVER been offered N scale waterslide before. I've a long cut of MTL PFE cars that need to be corrected.