Author Topic: Intermountain SD40-2  (Read 103896 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9024
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1793
    • Layout Progress Blog
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #121 on: January 05, 2017, 08:18:19 AM »
0
The truck height, space above the truck, and wheel size looks "off" when compared to the HO model, the Kato SD 40-2, and the prototype.

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #122 on: January 05, 2017, 08:39:20 AM »
0
The color on the IC&E is hideous. I hope that is just the camera settings.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26044
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11498
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #123 on: January 05, 2017, 10:14:43 AM »
0
Oh man, now I need to get over there to see one in person.

Of course it's the day my wife's home sick... her office is 5 minutes away. "Hey honey, wanna grab lunch?"


C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11409
  • Respect: +2868
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #124 on: January 05, 2017, 10:32:03 AM »
0
I'd say, "Better hurry!", 'cuz in watching inventory since @Mark5 told us they were in stock, they are flying out the door. A few combinations of road name and/or sound-equipped seem to have been hit hard, and are depleted already. Hopefully at least one was somebody here interested in sharing. :ashat: :D
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

conrail98

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1461
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #125 on: January 05, 2017, 10:37:18 AM »
0
I noticed especially the sound units are going. Thought I might need to grab a UP one for run throughs but even they are going quickly,

Phil
- Phil

flight2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 795
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +370
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #126 on: January 05, 2017, 10:53:59 AM »
0
I thought these were coming delivered in three versions (DC, DCC, DCC w/Sound)?  I'm only seeing the DC and DCC w/Sound versions at MBK.  Am I missing something?

Thanks!

Cheers,
Brian
I've never met a covered hopper I didn't like.... :)
My (HO) NW Ohio Layout Feed: https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=57633.msg793742#msg793742

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5303
  • Respect: +2618
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #127 on: January 05, 2017, 11:50:31 AM »
0
Is it me or are all of the cab side windows slightly off?  Has anyone seen one in person?

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6812
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1736
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #128 on: January 05, 2017, 11:56:15 AM »
0
Is it me or are all of the cab side windows slightly off?  Has anyone seen one in person?


Yeah, I noticed that they look a little like a parallelogram, not quite square or rectangle.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26044
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11498
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #129 on: January 05, 2017, 11:59:22 AM »
0
Looking at the largest photo I could find:
http://cdn3.volusion.com/ztna9.tft5b/v/vspfiles/photos/IMR-69322-01-2.jpg?1483531926

I don't see a lot to hate.

The horns are a little meh, but those are easy fixes.

I'm maintaining my cautious optimism.

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5303
  • Respect: +2618
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #130 on: January 05, 2017, 12:00:51 PM »
0
I'm optimistic too.  The rest looks great- I might pick up one of the GATX for variety.  Surely one still runs in 2017 :)

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12334
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8559
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #131 on: January 05, 2017, 12:15:58 PM »
0
Is it me or are all of the cab side windows slightly off?  Has anyone seen one in person?

I'm not sure what we're seeing regarding the cab windows, but the sunshades, once installed, will help disguise any irregularity.  Like others, I remain cautiously optimistic.  The big question is: "How do they run?"

DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #132 on: January 05, 2017, 12:30:49 PM »
0
The color on the IC&E is hideous. I hope that is just the camera settings.

I hate to say, I VERY much doubt it is the camera. Perhaps a good fade coat will help.
Buffering...

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11845
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #133 on: January 05, 2017, 12:40:18 PM »
0
I hate to say, I VERY much doubt it is the camera. Perhaps a good fade coat will help.

The photos on MBK's site are sometimes way off in terms of color.


Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11845
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Intermountain SD40-2
« Reply #134 on: January 05, 2017, 12:41:31 PM »
0
Looking at the largest photo I could find:
http://cdn3.volusion.com/ztna9.tft5b/v/vspfiles/photos/IMR-69322-01-2.jpg?1483531926

I don't see a lot to hate.

The horns are a little meh, but those are easy fixes.

I'm maintaining my cautious optimism.

I will see them up close soon - maybe today. One concern I have is the couplers - they seem to stick out even more than the Kato versions.

Mark