Author Topic: MTL heavyweight baggage car  (Read 31792 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6186
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #135 on: March 30, 2015, 09:48:06 PM »
0
N Scale Supply has low-rez pics up of the April releases.  It appears the Erie car has #1016s and that's how all the baggage cars are being shipped.  As with the diner however, 1015s can be swapped in to reduce the coupling distance.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


arbomambo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1512
  • Respect: +1522
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #136 on: March 30, 2015, 11:11:06 PM »
0
BLW has pics up as well
Bruce
"STILL Thrilled to be in N scale!"

Bruce M. Arbo
CATT- Coastal Alabama T-TRAK
https://nationalt-traklayout.com/


Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 19530
  • Respect: +6826
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #137 on: March 31, 2015, 03:36:41 AM »
0
Joe,  For people like me who will be buying a few to re-number. Does the MTL lettering match any decals available? What about paint, who's pullman green did you use on these?

Thanks

reinhardtjh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3153
  • Respect: +421
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #138 on: March 31, 2015, 03:58:46 AM »
0
N Scale Supply has low-rez pics up of the April releases.  It appears the Erie car has #1016s and that's how all the baggage cars are being shipped.  As with the diner however, 1015s can be swapped in to reduce the coupling distance.


BLW has pics up as well
Bruce

Figures...   :facepalm:  But at 7:47PM eastern time when I posted BLW didn't (I checked first).  But I didn't actually check N Scale Supply's page.
John H. Reinhardt
PRRT&HS #8909
C&O HS #11530
N-Trak #7566

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6186
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #139 on: March 31, 2015, 08:52:35 AM »
0
I am sure they plan on releases that maximize their return on their investment. If a Santa Fe version could recoup the entire investment in one release it would be kind of stupid to release the proto version before the SF.  They could take the recouped money and start the next product while making profit on proto and other road names.  % made up to illustrate my point.

You don't recoup the investment in one release. It takes a few, under normal circumstances (i.e. releasing 5 or so road names simultaneously per release) before the tooling is amortized. I have no idea how many releases it takes for MTL to amortize new tooling. But a handful of releases annually won't do it, so there are no detriments to MTL in releasing the prototypical schemes first.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


arbomambo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1512
  • Respect: +1522
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #140 on: March 31, 2015, 08:53:40 AM »
0
reserved my two Erie cars from BLW!...
chomping at the bit for the undecs...(at LEAST 8!!!)
Bruce
"STILL Thrilled to be in N scale!"

Bruce M. Arbo
CATT- Coastal Alabama T-TRAK
https://nationalt-traklayout.com/


JoeD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1938
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1389
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #141 on: March 31, 2015, 01:57:28 PM »
0
PRR modelers are lagging behind Erie modelers by a good amount.  you guys better step up and buy many and buy often  :D

Joe
in my civvies here.  I only represent my grandmothers home made Mac and Cheese on Railwire.

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4365
  • Respect: +1263
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #142 on: March 31, 2015, 02:13:10 PM »
0
Have a couple on order, but hoping that in some future release, you save me the time and trouble and do some in the Erie two tone green scheme.  I enjoy the painting, but decaling stripes is not my favorite part of the hobby.
Tom D.

I gave up rivet counting when I couldn't see an N scale rivet anymore.

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3738
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +648
    • The Modern PRR
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #143 on: March 31, 2015, 02:16:59 PM »
0
PRR modelers are lagging behind Erie modelers by a good amount.  you guys better step up and buy many and buy often  :D

Joe

Joe, all these cryptic comments and smilies directed at the SPFs has my curiosity piqued. Do you perchance have something in the pipeline that needs PRR sales to justify?

Given that this is an Erie prototype and totally incorrect for anything the PRR rostered, I don't think it's surprising that Erie sales are out in front. Frankly I think it's a testament that died-in-the-wool SPFs are talking about getting them, knowing that they're foobies.

As I mentioned in my last post, any chance of "Pennsying them up" a bit with the 3D-7P2 trucks? Since you guys have them anyway...
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 02:23:03 PM by eric220 »
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 19530
  • Respect: +6826
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #144 on: March 31, 2015, 02:47:43 PM »
0
While reserving my baggage cars I then went to reserve a crap ton of single window coaches, but couldn't find them  :? :-X :| :RUEffinKiddingMe:

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #145 on: March 31, 2015, 03:11:22 PM »
0
PRR modelers are lagging behind Erie modelers by a good amount.  you guys better step up and buy many and buy often  :D

Joe

Or "prototype schemes outsell foobies"???

Moose and Squirrel!


JoeD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1938
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1389
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #146 on: March 31, 2015, 03:41:32 PM »
0
not always usually true... the 122,000 as an example....proto's did well, but the ATSF Foob out sold them all by a wide margin.  PRR Diner only squeaked by later releases...  PRR is usually soft given the number of modelers who model the modern roads..at least for us.  And my tongue in cheek comment was meant to get PRR guys to step up...I mean...who models Erie  :D

Joe
in my civvies here.  I only represent my grandmothers home made Mac and Cheese on Railwire.

Ngineer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 447
  • Respect: +35
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #147 on: March 31, 2015, 04:14:43 PM »
0
Erie Railroad and Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (DL&W) merged in 1960 to form the Erie Lackawanna Railroad (EL).

WHEN did Erie Lackawanna change the paint scheme of the baggage car now being offered by Micro-Trains?

I assume it did take some time, but how much? Or did they patch the road numbers and/or name of the railroad in a matter of days?

Javier

(Oh and, btw, I bought the prototypical PRR diner, too. It's the thing we N-Scale modelers miss the most: Prototypical models. But I do understand the reasons. Every company has to earn a few bucks to make a living...)

On a side note, which 122 000 were the prototypical ones?
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 04:18:02 PM by Ngineer »

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3825
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #148 on: March 31, 2015, 04:22:01 PM »
0
but the ATSF Foob out sold them all by a wide margin.

To be fair you could put Santa Fe on a loaf of bread and modelers would line up around the block...  ;)

Joe, has there been any thought to making some Soo Line passenger cars? Would go really well with the CPR series you've done... :)
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 04:23:57 PM by Missaberoad »

towl1996

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 816
  • Chairman of TRW Busty Cougar Welcoming Committee
  • Respect: +183
Re: MTL heavyweight baggage car
« Reply #149 on: March 31, 2015, 04:28:15 PM »
0
Joe, all these cryptic comments and smilies directed at the SPFs has my curiosity piqued. Do you perchance have something in the pipeline that needs PRR sales to justify?


MTL is going to do the R50b. That's why GHQ only did one run.  :trollface:

Seriously, they have to use the 3D-7P2 trucks on something else....right?

Right now I'm only in for one. It's my way of saying thanks to MTL for the other correct Pennsy passenger cars they produced.
Never argue with idiots; they'll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.