Author Topic: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?  (Read 7357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

victor miranda

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1604
  • Respect: +2
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2014, 05:15:41 PM »
0
you guys think they will do the grayhound scheme?
 :scared:

I may have to sell something :facepalm:

EspeeGoldenState

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 663
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +138
    • Modern Southern Pacific
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2014, 07:07:40 PM »
0
Unless they do a post-2005 rebuild version of UP 844, I most likely wont buy another.

The one GS-4 version I wish they had done was when she was in high gloss black with pinstrips and BNSF logos on her. Definitely would put that train together.



Chris
Attempting to model a modern Southern Pacific based in 2015/2016...

Also, I have a passenger train addiction...

carlso

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1129
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +514
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2014, 07:30:46 PM »
0

That is almost sacrilegious, however  that photo shows what a beauty that loco is. The black with pinstripes I had never seen, but it shows her as classy as possible. I wouldn't mind having one of those too. Oh where is my airbrush?

Carl
Carl Sowell
El Paso, Texas

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12331
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8545
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2014, 07:41:12 PM »
0
Kato won't harm my wallet, unless they do this 4-8-4, which I realize just ain't gonna happen:



DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35225
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6622
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2014, 07:50:41 PM »
0
Unless they do a post-2005 rebuild version of UP 844, I most likely wont buy another.

The one GS-4 version I wish they had done was when she was in high gloss black with pinstrips and BNSF logos on her. Definitely would put that train together.


Looks like a rather easy custom paint job to me.  What is holding you back?  :)
. . . 42 . . .

EspeeGoldenState

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 663
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +138
    • Modern Southern Pacific
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2014, 09:00:48 PM »
0
Looks like a rather easy custom paint job to me.  What is holding you back?  :)

Definitely thought about picking up a war baby to do it to, but almost bit the bullet on the AFT first when Lowell Smith started doing the whole thing, then the rumors of 844 started to procure and turned my projects to that.

Honestly, I don't want 3-4 versions of 4449. I'm happy with just the one to run my Daylight set, though I still have the AFT in the back of my mind of maybe one day.

Chris
Attempting to model a modern Southern Pacific based in 2015/2016...

Also, I have a passenger train addiction...

strummer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 998
  • Respect: +65
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2014, 09:11:06 PM »
0
Kato won't harm my wallet, unless they do this 4-8-4, which I realize just ain't gonna happen:



DFF

Which road is that? ACL? She's a handsome one,to be sure. Kinda reminds me of the Timken "Four Aces"...kinda.

Mark in Oregon

pjm20

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1195
  • Gender: Male
  • Modeling the Bellefonte Central
  • Respect: +164
    • My Youtube Channel
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #22 on: December 17, 2014, 09:14:22 PM »
0
I vote for the Timken Ace! NP fans will agree too!  :D
Peter
Modeling the Bellefonte Central Railroad circa 1953
PRRT&HS #8862
Live Steam Enthusiast

Check out my Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/PennsyModeler

Wardie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 396
  • Respect: +34
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #23 on: December 17, 2014, 09:23:00 PM »
0
Kato could get my attention with a B&M R1-D, or a MEC class D Hudson or C-3 Pacific.

Cajonpassfan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5398
  • Respect: +1973
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #24 on: December 17, 2014, 09:32:08 PM »
0
you guys think they will do the grayhound scheme?
 :scared:

I may have to sell something :facepalm:

Victor, me too....

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35225
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6622
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #25 on: December 17, 2014, 09:46:09 PM »
0
Definitely thought about picking up a war baby to do it to, but almost bit the bullet on the AFT first when Lowell Smith started doing the whole thing, then the rumors of 844 started to procure and turned my projects to that.

Honestly, I don't want 3-4 versions of 4449. I'm happy with just the one to run my Daylight set, though I still have the AFT in the back of my mind of maybe one day.

Chris

I bought the AFT version. I also bought few of Lowell Smith's AFT cars. But the fidelity of those issues (despite to me the outrageously high price for what you get) made me abandon the subscription to his set. I then bought a $200 decal set to model the accurate AFT and started collecting the proper cars.  Accurate model of the AFT is now one of my future projects.
. . . 42 . . .

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #26 on: December 17, 2014, 10:44:28 PM »
0
I really do not understand why they don't do the C&O AS616!!!!!   :D

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10563
  • Respect: +1750
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #27 on: December 18, 2014, 01:10:57 AM »
0
Sirenwerks:  I'll buy one of your NCL's, but would rather have a MILW Boxcab than the Little Joe.  As many paint schemes (at least three), unit combinations (at least eight), and paint scheme combinations (unknown, as it varied every time a unit needed work) as they served in, Kato could be making these for years.  Also, it would be much simpler than a Little Joe mechanically, and would take sharper curves.  And we already have a brass Little Joe, although it has "issues" other than being very expensive and out of production. 

That said, I'd buy a Kato Little Joe....  Trivia:  They got the name "Little Joe" because they were the smallest freight motors on the railroad, except for the single unit Boxcab switchers.  The Westinghouse passenger motors were only three inches shorter, noticeable taller, and about ten tons lighter.  Even after adding concrete and scrap iron ballast, they were too light to start heavy freights without slipping, which is the original reason for running diesel helpers behind them.  Good motors, but NOT designed for heavy freight service on mountain grades.
N Kalanaga
Be well

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #28 on: December 18, 2014, 01:59:51 AM »
0
Trivia:  They got the name "Little Joe" because they were the smallest freight motors on the railroad, except for the single unit Boxcab switchers.

What's your source on that?  The Joe Stalin version seems to be the most popular and it's what I remember from before internet days.

Jason

delamaize

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2637
  • Gender: Male
  • Prairie Line Native
  • Respect: +950
Re: Will Kato Hammer our wallets again?
« Reply #29 on: December 18, 2014, 04:46:38 AM »
0
What's your source on that?  The Joe Stalin version seems to be the most popular and it's what I remember from before internet days.

Jason

THIS. they were Called "Little Joe Stalins" at first, then shortened to "Little Joe" because the design and order was orginally destin for the USSR.

Quote from: wikipedia
"GE built 20 locomotives of this type, but they were prohibited from delivering them to the Soviet Railways (SZhD) due to relations between the US and USSR deteriorating into what became known as the Cold War. Fourteen were built to the track gauge of 5 ft (1,524 mm) and the final six were built to 4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge.[snip]

The Milwaukee's operating employees referred to the units as Little Joe Stalin's locomotives which was eventually shortened to simply Little Joe.

...the controls were initially labelled in Russian....

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee_Road_class_EF-4_and_EP-4

Don't mean to sound like an a$$.....
« Last Edit: December 18, 2014, 04:49:31 AM by delamaize »
Mike
Skookumchuck Belt Line Founder

Northern Pacific, Tacoma Division, 4th subdivision "The Prarie Line" (still in planning stages)