0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
But can we still bitch and moan about Kato not doing enough Eastern roads...?
I'd love for someone to come up with some hard statistics on Kato's production with respect to eastern versus western roads. I've got well over a hundred Kato locos in PRR, NYC, DL&W, B&O, C&O, D&H, EL, RDG and others. What's the origin of this "bias" that so many people claim?
...IMO the "bias" must be based on Kato's affinity to produce passenger train sets based on Western prototypes. What do we have for eastern roads? Broadway Ltd? Anything else you can think of?
Since we are now totally OT...
IMO the "bias" must be based on Kato's affinity to produce passenger train sets based on Western prototypes. What do we have for eastern roads? Broadway Ltd? Anything else you can think of? If you say Amtrak, I wouldn't agree. That is a generic, nationwide railroad service. I would love to see Kato produce late 30s NYC 20th Century Limited. With the Dreyfuss Hudson of course.
Why Kato E vs W poluting this thread , and to boot even by a mod ? Is this a ploy to move it to the Crew Lounge to hide the thing from MTL tomorrow ? Whoever started this Kato crap please repost it to a Kato thread of your own . Mods please , you're sending us mixed signals .
Hard facts are troublesome and should be avoided as they occasionally require people to reexamine long-held opinions.
...Wish I had Kiz's monkey scatching his head here.
What he said. Facts always cloud the issue and are irksome things that expose truths where they are not welcome.The Kato western bias was around long before they got hot and heavy into the named passenger trains. I think it (around here) was likely spawned by the lack of a CR SD40-2 release. Also, all roads west of the Hudson are Western Roads