Author Topic: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's  (Read 9775 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

seusscaboose

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2098
  • Respect: +219
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #60 on: January 24, 2013, 09:01:35 PM »
0
We need a Vaseline branded tank car.

apparently you haven't seen this one either... :facepalm:
http://www.ipernity.com/doc/virginiaspring/10236255
"I have a train full of basements"

NKPH&TS #3589

Inspiration at:
http://nkphts.org/modelersnotebook

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1014
    • Facebook Profile
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #61 on: January 24, 2013, 09:05:29 PM »
0
apparently you haven't seen this one either... :facepalm:
http://www.ipernity.com/doc/virginiaspring/10236255


Nice. I bet that "shorty" tanker is envious of the monster 12 incher next to it.
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

LN2800

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 100
  • Respect: +11
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #62 on: January 24, 2013, 09:28:12 PM »
0
in Enola, no less. Interesting. But if you read the copy on the back of the box, that doesn't seem like what they were going for.


I'm not sure what they were thinking on the car copy, I usually ignore it since they have a history of errors, and ACL's pulpwood cars looked nothing even remotely like the MTL model, but the number they used on the model is only seven slots away from the pictured car, this is definitely the prototype they were working from. I recall at one point there was a discussion as to whether or not large bulkhead flats even existed prior to the SCL merger (1967). I guess now we know.   8)



Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #63 on: January 24, 2013, 10:28:08 PM »
0
Never seen one of those tankers.  CSX does add container cars on the rear of the empty train.


They still running the empties back with the trash train to VA?  I (not so) fondly remember that in the early 90s...

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #64 on: January 24, 2013, 10:32:42 PM »
0
The trash train is now run seperately.  Even in this cold weather you can smell those damn containers.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6761
  • Respect: +2638
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #65 on: January 25, 2013, 08:59:19 AM »
0
Dimensions for the BNSF, OLD UP, NEW UP, and TPIX cars are below

BNSF 82-2 long 10-7 wide 17-0 tall
TPIX 76-8 long 10-8 wide 15-5 tall
OLD UP 75-1 long 10-8 wide 17-0 tall (The 110xxx series)
New UP 82-6 long 10-8 wide 17-0 tall (The 170xxx series)

Interesting, I wasn't aware of the 82' ARMN's,  the first batch seems to be built by Greenbriar in late 2012:

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=3331325

While they're not identical to the BNSF reefers, maybe this increases the likelihood of an 82' version getting done some day...

Tom, as you can see in Robb's photos, the TPIX cars are a foot and a half shorter - that's the biggest spotting difference.  That said, the scheme does work on this car, IMHO.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11423
  • Respect: +2887
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #66 on: January 25, 2013, 09:12:45 AM »
0
Thankfully it is not in tankers!

The best I can tell in quick surfing, that Tropicana tank car is one-of-a-kind. I would not be surprised if they shipped juice concentrate in it, but I am surprised that they would put their trade dress on an industrial vessel containing intermediate process. Like Bob said, who wants to know their orange juice comes out of a tank car? It's almost like knowing how sausage is made.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Smike

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 821
  • Respect: +198
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #67 on: January 25, 2013, 09:26:48 AM »
0
Ya'll need to stop crying over  nscale foobs... poor HO's folks.. they get the scales mixed up with their foobs.

http://a248.e.akamai.net/origin-cdn.volusion.com/ztna9.tft5b/v/vspfiles/photos/MTH-81-99012-2.jpg


Denver Road Doug

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2120
  • Respect: +29
    • Mockingbird Industrial
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #68 on: January 25, 2013, 09:58:46 AM »
0
Interesting, I wasn't aware of the 82' ARMN's,  the first batch seems to be built by Greenbriar in late 2012:

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=3331325

While they're not identical to the BNSF reefers, maybe this increases the likelihood of an 82' version getting done some day...

Tom, as you can see in Robb's photos, the TPIX cars are a foot and a half shorter - that's the biggest spotting difference.  That said, the scheme does work on this car, IMHO.

So, in all of this, why does BLMA call theirs a 64' Reefer?   Assuming that is simply the box dimensions?
NOTE: I'm no longer active on this forum.   If you need to contact me, use the e-mail address (or visit the website link) attached to this username.  Thanks.

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #69 on: January 25, 2013, 12:11:59 PM »
0

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6812
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1736
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #70 on: January 25, 2013, 02:05:19 PM »
0
Interesting, I wasn't aware of the 82' ARMN's,  the first batch seems to be built by Greenbrier in late 2012:


True, and with many components supplied by yours truly...   8)
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #71 on: January 25, 2013, 02:50:28 PM »
0
Good to see somebody finally put doors on them...

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12342
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8579
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #72 on: January 25, 2013, 06:29:03 PM »
0
CSX does add container cars on the rear of the empty train.

What you're seeing, Bob, is loaded unit trains northbound to New Jersey and blocks of empty reefers southbound to Florida in mixed trains.

DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #73 on: January 25, 2013, 06:35:21 PM »
0
What you're seeing, Bob, is loaded unit trains northbound to New Jersey and blocks of empty reefers southbound to Florida in mixed trains.

DFF

I guess you could call the Southbound train a mixed.  I remember they started this a couple years ago.  Apparently they make lost more money adding trailers and containers to the rear of the train.  And I've always seen them on the rear.  Either direction it's still the juice train which I've seen since the 70s and am glad that something stays the same.

P.S.  Don't know if it's true but I was told that before they shipped by train they used small ship tankers.  Apparently they lost one sometime back and switched to rail.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6761
  • Respect: +2638
Re: BLMA Tropicana Reefer's
« Reply #74 on: January 25, 2013, 11:37:06 PM »
0
True, and with many components supplied by yours truly...   8)

Very nice!  How about an N scale version while you're at it.  :)