Author Topic: Tehachapi, BC  (Read 477665 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3366
  • Respect: +589
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #555 on: January 13, 2013, 07:05:14 PM »
0
* The main UP intermodal over the Pass is the LA-Portaland stack train (which might have a Bay Area component - I'm not sure); as Eric notes, this routinely has at least one DPU and it's not uncommon for it to have a 1+1 configuration.  (I'm going to need a bunch of green HUB Group cans soon if I'm going to model this train though!)

The Portland to LA train (ZBRLC) is usually mostly TOFC with some stacks mixed in.  I suppose it may be getting to be more stacks and less TOFC as time as gone on.

http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?train_id=ZBRLC  (or search for keyword ZBRLC, you'll get more results).

There is also the Lathrop to LA train (ZLTLA).   (Lathrop is just south of Sacramento.)   I believe this train handles any domestic container traffic from the Bay Area.  I believe this train is only a few years old and has been almost all 53' stacks since it's inception.  Often it is a short train that could realistically be modeled at full length on a model railroad.

http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?train_id=ZLTLA-18
http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?train_id=ZLTLA

The northbound counterpart for the ZBRLC is similar in makeup.  I'm not quite sure about the northbound Lathrop counterpart.  Both of those trains run over the pass at night, so there are relatively few pictures of them.
 

sizemore

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2779
  • Respect: +144
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #556 on: January 13, 2013, 07:20:02 PM »
0
Those vids are sexy! Can't believe it's not DCC!

The S.

Thompson Sub: Instagram | Youtube | Website

Bsklarski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6
    • B&M Conn River Line
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #557 on: January 15, 2013, 02:41:07 PM »
0
By coincidence, another videographer caught the same train on the Loop, with a better camera ;)

https://vimeo.com/56851891

-gfh

If I had a dollar for every time I pulled a train over our ruling grade at 2 mph, I would be wealthy. Nothing like sitting there pulling at 2 mph and watching your marker on the head end box go STOP..... FORWARD....... STOP......... BACKWARD....... STOP........
Brian Sklarski
Engineer, New England Central Railroad

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boston-Maine-Conn-River-Line/173358446076160

LKOrailroad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 380
  • Respect: +239
    • LK&O Railroad
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #558 on: January 15, 2013, 04:27:49 PM »
0
Quote
Nothing like sitting there pulling at 2 mph and watching your marker on the head end box go STOP..... FORWARD....... STOP......... BACKWARD....... STOP........

Help out the uneducated please. What does this mean?
Alan

When I was a kid... no wait, I still do that. HO, 28x32, double deck, 1969, RailPro

http://www.lkorailroad.com

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11418
  • Respect: +2875
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #559 on: January 15, 2013, 04:50:02 PM »
0
Help out the uneducated please. What does this mean?

This is on the display unit in the locomotive cab corresponding to the EOT Device, a/k/a "FRED". Not only does it display the brake line pressure, it displays the status of the sensor which tells whether the rear end of the train is moving (or not) and what direction it is moving. At very low speeds the inertial detector doesn't see quite enough momentum and will display ambiguous information mostly due to vibration.

Sort of the prototype's version of the MTL "slinky" effect, but in this case it's just the sensor data giving the impression slack is running in and out.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12338
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8564
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #560 on: January 15, 2013, 05:06:38 PM »
0
Sort of the prototype's version of the MTL "slinky" effect, but in this case it's just the sensor data giving the impression slack is running in and out.

Ed's law at play.  :trollface:

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

LKOrailroad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 380
  • Respect: +239
    • LK&O Railroad
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #561 on: January 15, 2013, 05:45:36 PM »
0
Quote
This is on the display unit in the locomotive cab corresponding to the EOT Device, a/k/a "FRED". Not only does it display the brake line pressure, it displays the status of the sensor which tells whether the rear end of the train is moving (or not) and what direction it is moving. At very low speeds the inertial detector doesn't see quite enough momentum and will display ambiguous information mostly due to vibration.

I get it now. Thanks for the explanation.
Alan

When I was a kid... no wait, I still do that. HO, 28x32, double deck, 1969, RailPro

http://www.lkorailroad.com

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3738
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +648
    • The Modern PRR
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #562 on: January 15, 2013, 10:58:04 PM »
0
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

Bsklarski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6
    • B&M Conn River Line
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #563 on: January 15, 2013, 11:07:21 PM »
0
Sort of the prototype's version of the MTL "slinky" effect, but in this case it's just the sensor data giving the impression slack is running in and out.

Actually, it slack. You can feel the training coming in and running out. You can also see it on the amp meter and feel the units slipping when it runs out. The rear really does stop as far movement goes. A train with more empties than loads will make this worst lol.
Brian Sklarski
Engineer, New England Central Railroad

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boston-Maine-Conn-River-Line/173358446076160

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5070
  • Respect: +2094
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #564 on: January 16, 2013, 03:34:15 PM »
0

Bsklarski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6
    • B&M Conn River Line
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #565 on: January 16, 2013, 05:01:37 PM »
0
Brian Sklarski
Engineer, New England Central Railroad

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boston-Maine-Conn-River-Line/173358446076160

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11418
  • Respect: +2875
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #566 on: January 16, 2013, 06:31:50 PM »
0
Actually, it slack. ...

Well, that's fun. Apparently the newer FREDs must be better at low speeds than the early stuff. Makes sense; lots of advances in inertial sensor technology since then. The old FREDs had a steel ball on sliders to detect movement and direction. Pretty sloppy.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6761
  • Respect: +2638
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #567 on: January 16, 2013, 07:04:50 PM »
0
The new one is also a phone, and can update Facebook.... ;)   BTW Bsklarski, how long a climb do you have?  Is it undulating or steady?

So a symbol question: when I listen to the UP and BNSF dispatchers around Mojave, they never refer to train symbols; they call trains by the number of the lead loco.  If they don't use the symbols, who does, and for what purpose?

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3366
  • Respect: +589
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #568 on: January 17, 2013, 12:01:39 AM »
0
So a symbol question: when I listen to the UP and BNSF dispatchers around Mojave, they never refer to train symbols; they call trains by the number of the lead loco.  If they don't use the symbols, who does, and for what purpose?

Well, I think the dispatchers still know which lead locos are attached to which symbols, so they can remember where each train is supposed to go and decide which trains get priority.  And whoever makes up the trains in the yards, usually before road power is even chosen, must also use the symbols. 

For purposes of modeling mainline operations without yards or branches, you can probably do a dispatch session without train symbols, if you like.  Unless you get a kick out of having your trains realistically match what's seen on different prototype symbols.

Bsklarski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6
    • B&M Conn River Line
Re: Tehachapi, BC
« Reply #569 on: January 17, 2013, 09:26:29 AM »
0
The new one is also a phone, and can update Facebook.... ;)   BTW Bsklarski, how long a climb do you have?  Is it undulating or steady?


Well Coming South out of Amherst Mass, its very undulating. The worst part is 2 miles of 1.37, then some undulations or a .5 or so for 1.5 miles. The 1.25 or so for about 5 miles with some minor changes. Lots of steep short sections of grades.
Brian Sklarski
Engineer, New England Central Railroad

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boston-Maine-Conn-River-Line/173358446076160