0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Don't put staging in front. That would make it less than hidden.You can still fiddle with the staged trains over on the left and or right sides at the staging throats..Lee
it might work better is the staging was in front of the yard... this way i could fiddle while a train takes a lap...
Don't put staging in front. That would make it less than hidden.You can still fiddle with the staged trains over on the left and or right sides at the staging throats..
Quote from: wm3798 on February 25, 2009, 12:27:50 PMDon't put staging in front. That would make it less than hidden.You can still fiddle with the staged trains over on the left and or right sides at the staging throats..the staging will be several inches lower and everything will be painted black. it will be obvious to look at and operationally that it is separate. operations is the key.
here's a mockup...i've worked it out to a 3% down grade if the Warwick yard is raised up 1 inch.
Yes, but look at the areas that are now being covered--the throats, just were you need the most visibility.Visibility is the key.
Quote from: David K. Smith on February 25, 2009, 12:59:57 PMYes, but look at the areas that are now being covered--the throats, just were you need the most visibility.Visibility is the key.i understand that, that's why it's a representation, not a scale drawing
OK, then, let's see a scale drawing.
...or through the door?
Quote from: David K. Smith on February 25, 2009, 01:07:13 PMOK, then, let's see a scale drawing.if you omit Warwick...
Quote from: Ryan87 on February 25, 2009, 12:42:26 PM...or through the door? that's an excellent point... Ryan, you're a genius.
...then I'd put the staging yard across the back in its place, on the same level as everything else, with just a scenic divider. There... no grades, and you can split the lines off beyond the Franklin siding, and fix that problem too.