Author Topic: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.  (Read 7005 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ryan87

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • Gender: Male
  • Stay thirsty my friend...
  • Respect: 0
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2010, 04:10:58 PM »
0
So how do they differ?
Jason

Roof, ribs, ends... I'll find some photos to compare.
Swimming in a sea of Action Red...

Ryan87

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • Gender: Male
  • Stay thirsty my friend...
  • Respect: 0
Swimming in a sea of Action Red...

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11877
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +942
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #32 on: December 28, 2010, 04:29:08 PM »
0
The Soo Line car is a Magor car the mtl is an Evans. Not even close to the same car but "similar" in shape...

Mucho gracias!


mcjaco

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1754
  • Respect: +147
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #33 on: December 28, 2010, 04:55:32 PM »
0
.....and it's not easy finding the right decals to make SOO passenger yourself... or; does anyone have a source...?

I believe they only had 4 total too.  Don't quote me on that on though, passenger equipment isn't my strong suit.

At least SOO Line is short and sweet and could be hacked from a lettering set. 
~ Matt

Modutrak.com

Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +247
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #34 on: December 28, 2010, 05:31:56 PM »
0
I believe they only had 4 total too.  Don't quote me on that on though, passenger equipment isn't my strong suit.

At least SOO Line is short and sweet and could be hacked from a lettering set. 

There are hundreds of SOO cars I'd like to do; that said the decals are still hard to find, even to hack...sigh !
Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!

mplsjct

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 506
  • Respect: +452
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #35 on: December 29, 2010, 02:59:45 PM »
0
Are we talking about this car?



I made decals for it earlier this year.
I’m not here to argue

Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +247
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #36 on: December 29, 2010, 04:48:03 PM »
0
Are we talking about this car?



I made decals for it earlier this year.

I'm guessing that MTL's doesn't come with a cat however.............. ;D
Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #37 on: January 06, 2011, 12:55:39 PM »
0
Just received a Chuck pack with the PRR mail and Pullman Villa Royal.  I know these are phobies but I ordered them anyways.  The Pullman can fill in as a 10-3 sleeper.  Both cars have a really great tuscan red paint job and lettering.  Now just have to wait a few months to get the 3 pack of proper PRR Pullman cars.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12278
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11764
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #38 on: January 06, 2011, 08:01:22 PM »
0
Got my PRR Heavyweight Chuck pack tonight too...  Will post pics.  They're beautiful, foobie or not!

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9384
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6189
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #39 on: January 06, 2011, 11:15:01 PM »
0
Pennsy and their damn ice A/C units.  Throws you off getting the correct 12-1 cars.  However, if and when they come out with the PRR 12-1, close enough is good for me in this case.

For future reference - eight 12-1 Plan 3410 and 3410A cars painted Pennsy red and equipped with mechanical A/C:  Adamsdale, Belfast, Carville, Ravenna, McEwen, McRaven, Sunbrook, Waltersburg.

No 28-1 Plan 3416 parlors for Pennsy.
 
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5404
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2158
    • Modutrak
Re: MTL Jan. release incl. two (2) PRR heavyweights.
« Reply #40 on: January 07, 2011, 12:54:31 AM »
0
MTL made the mistake because they followed the caption on page 24 of Morning Sun's Color Guide to Freight and Passenger Equipment Volume 2 which reads "...Villa Royal was a 10 sections, 1 drawings room, 2 compartment car rebuilt in January 1931 from El Monte, a 1911- built car featuring 10 sections, 1 drawings room, 2 compartments."

But then you look at the photo of Villa Royal and it's clearly not a match to the MTL model.  The aisle side pictured is completely different.

Unfortunately it doesn't look like the lettering was drawn accurately either. 

I understand when deadlines come and go and information is hard to find and educated guesses have to be made to get product out the door.  But frequently with MTL it seems like I'm holding the exact same information they used, and come to a vastly different interpretation of the material.  Lake Merritt, a proper 10-1-2 is pictured on the same page in the color guide as Villa Royal, and the window pattern clearly matches the MTL model.  It's just like the goofy Rock Island express boxcars where they bypassed the proper P-S car on the same page as the incorrect car/number series, and clearly were using the color guide for their information since matching verbage from the color guide caption made it onto the box label, and yet produced the wrong car.  And the BNSF covered hoppers last month that used Trinity 5161 numbers instead of ACF cars...  It's just sad at this point.  It really is.