Author Topic: Intermountain forgets N scale in February  (Read 7553 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9384
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6187
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Intermountain forgets N scale in February
« Reply #60 on: February 18, 2011, 02:22:48 PM »
0
Also keep in mind the possibility that the manufacturer (Kato in this case) may not be aware of any issues.  Remember how surprised we all were to hear that Kato was unaware that their GG1 wide-stripe scheme was incorrect.  After I informed them, I provided them with the proper specs at their request.  Everything doesn't always get researched to the Nth degree, as disappointing as that is, and sometimes data and photos are misinterpreted.  On a lesser level, look at the first ESM Conrail ex-PC XIH scheme.  I thought the road number was one thing, and then we dissected it here by scrutinizing the lone photo and discovered it was not what I had thought.

I'm not defending, just pointing out that it could be due to lack of knowledge as opposed to cutting manufacturing corners.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


sirenwerks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6031
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +507
Re: Intermountain forgets N scale in February
« Reply #61 on: February 18, 2011, 02:36:16 PM »
0
There is a "cult like" group of Kato-ites that will defend Kato regardless of their error or omission....

Yea, how about the lack of louvers on the NW2.
Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.