0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I wouldn't be asking for advice if the designs were already finished.The big difference between the Turbo and the Aerotrain, as someone mentioned, is that the single axles are articulated. They are centred between the cars and as such they need to swivel. Our current design has a neat centering spring. So what I am hearing is that pickup from every axle is really important. But it looks like we'll be blazing a new trail for this.-Jason
Thanks for your continued feedback!Picking up power is proving to be not so difficult. It's transferring power reliably to adjacent cars above a sprung, articulated truck that is our challenge. The coupling mechanism has to be robust enough to withstand a considerable amount of abuse. Having super fine multi-pin plugs between cars would not pass the oaf test unless we can devise a way of connecting them more automatically. Again, if it weren't for the articulated single axle truck, this would be a non-issue. Our N gauge Pendolino transfers power between cars very reliably.While there are some areas I am willing to compromise, I really don't like the idea of a solid truck fixed to one car. Bachmann did that on their TurboTrain in 1969. Almost 50 years later, ours should be better.-Jason
Thanks for your continued feedback!Picking up power is proving to be not so difficult. It's transferring power reliably to adjacent cars above a sprung, articulated truck that is our challenge. The coupling mechanism has to be robust enough to withstand a considerable amount of abuse. Having super fine multi-pin plugs between cars would not pass the oaf test unless we can devise a way of connecting them more automatically
While there are some areas I am willing to compromise, I really don't like the idea of a solid truck fixed to one car. Bachmann did that on their TurboTrain in 1969. Almost 50 years later, ours should be better.
Can you try something along the technology of those magnetic chargers that you see for cell phones nowadays? For example:https://www.amazon.com/NetDot-Generation-Magnetic-Charger-Adapter/dp/B019MZKHO2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1482270014&sr=8-1&keywords=magnetic+phone+chargerNot to mention that a fixed truck would likely kill the minimum radius that the train could negotiate.DFF
It's transferring power reliably to adjacent cars above a sprung, articulated truck that is our challenge. The coupling mechanism has to be robust enough to withstand a considerable amount of abuse. Having super fine multi-pin plugs between cars would not pass the oaf test unless we can devise a way of connecting them more automatically. -Jason
If you were planning on selling this set unassembled how about just making it permanently coupled (and hardwired). Just sell it in a long box! I think that would also be welcomed by those Oafs out there who like tiny trains. Besides it will be much easier to put on the track if it is permanently coupled (this is important for people like me who run their trains on NTRAK layouts for a day or two then put them back in the box until the next show).I own several articulated N scale model trains which are permanently coupled and are packaged in long skinny boxes. That is a 12" ruler for size reference. (Attachment Link)
If we could sell it in a long box like that it would solve a lot of problems. But I think the risk of damage would be huge. A five-car Amtrak Turbo would need a box more than two feet long. We could split the nine-car VIA/CN sets in two to fit the same length box. What is your experience with damage to long N scale boxes? -Jason
Be the first to think outside the box and sell it in a 3" mailing tube with a cylindrical foam insert .