Author Topic: Low bridge?!  (Read 539 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bob

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 467
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +611
Low bridge?!
« on: March 04, 2026, 11:29:38 AM »
+2
Two 5-unit well cars are set out alongside the CSX main in downtown Philadelphia.  Most of the top units have sustained damage.  Hard to believe there is still a low bridge someplace, but looks like someone messed up big-time!  Looks like the containers were empty. [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11403
  • Respect: +2862
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2026, 11:39:38 AM »
0
I knew of a low overpass in downtown Atlanta notorious for this. Don't know if it's been recently fixed or not.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11823
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +920
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2026, 12:26:10 PM »
0
Gotta wonder, at this point (2026) - how could they not know?  :trollface:


Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3825
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2026, 12:58:23 PM »
0
Gotta wonder, at this point (2026) - how could they not know?  :trollface:

P... S... R...

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11403
  • Respect: +2862
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2026, 01:00:31 PM »
0
Gotta wonder, at this point (2026) - how could they not know?  :trollface:

AI dispatching.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5293
  • Respect: +2594
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2026, 01:19:36 PM »
+1
Those well cars are nicely weathered   :D

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13993
  • Respect: +4175
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2026, 05:22:10 AM »
0
Forgot to use the NMRA clearance guage

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16551
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +7432
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2026, 09:39:32 PM »
0
Those are trash containers, no?  Peee Yewww!
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3919
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1055
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2026, 12:10:50 AM »
0
If that's Philly, someone just used a can opener on them.
Peter Pfotenhauer

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11403
  • Respect: +2862
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2026, 12:47:30 AM »
0
Those are trash containers, no?  Peee Yewww!

Well if they weren't, they're certainly trashed now!
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Maletrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4194
  • Respect: +873
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2026, 09:53:43 AM »
0
I wonder what happened to the bridge.  :scared:

I remember a truck with an above-clearance load damaging a highway bridge near DC badly enough to close that bridge. 

In this case, does the railroad even notify the highway department to reinspect their bridge?

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12325
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8526
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2026, 10:25:37 AM »
0

In this case, does the railroad even notify the highway department to reinspect their bridge?

Can you imagine the liability, if they don’t? 

As soon as I saw Philadelphia tagged to that photo, I immediately thought about the clearance projects on the Philly Sub.  As far as I know, the Howard Street tunnel is finished, but there’s a handful of other projects, e.g., bridges, that need more clearance along the line.  All I know is that I still haven’t seen a true double-stack on the Philly Sub, yet.  Admitted, I don’t really do much railfanning, though.

Maybe this was the test train. 🤣

DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

pedro

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 578
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +393
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2026, 12:22:15 PM »
0
We have a notorious low bridge at Cicero where the BRC crosses the BN main. Mains 1-3 won’t clear anything over 17-6, while mains 4 & 5 are several feet lower. It’s one of those things that “everyone knows,” but every few years someone hits it anyway. It’s in the timetable, on every GTB issued on the Chicago sub, listed as an exception on the work orders (train list) when you have anything over 17-6 in your train, and physical signs are posted in both directions.

The last time it got hit, they managed to shift the double-tracked BRC bridge enough that the belt was shut down for a couple of days. The engineer got about 12 stacks through it, all the while thinking there was something wrong with the locomotives, causing them to “surge.” He works elsewhere now.

There are also numerous low clearance underpasses on the roads below the elevated portion of the BN between Cicero and Chicago. Any time a truck strikes one, they shut the railroad down entirely until the track is inspected. DOT assesses fines to the trucking company for a bridge strike, regardless of the level of damage, from what I understand.

Hedron

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • Personal Text
  • Respect: +80
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2026, 11:52:35 PM »
0
So some nearly obliterated, some dented to varying degrees, some undented. Was the bridge bouncing?

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13993
  • Respect: +4175
Re: Low bridge?!
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2026, 01:39:28 PM »
0