0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I like the homage to Pud ..
Hi again,How many of you went the next step?Rapido siteThank you for completing our survey. The answers you have provided will help guide our N scale future products. You can also suggest a product of your choice directly to us by clicking this link: https://form.jotform.com/210555532174249Please give them your ideas and let them know the problems you've had.Right now I want B-unit Fs.
have to agree with Brokemoto - would like to see B&O blue and grey FA-2s which I think they did in HO.
Micro Trains sure seems to pump out freight cars with schemes from the 50’s & 60’s on a monthly basis. Somebody is buying them. I am often one of them.
I wonder if we are far enough removed from the release dates of the meat reefer that Rapido is willing to listen to the issues with that car.
Their choices of offerings are pretty iconic Canadian prototypes. For better or worse, that is what they are. I for one am pretty happy with their business model, even if many offerings don't ring my bell.
In contrast, the GP20 tankers were a bit of a mess IMO (those railings and vents!):
Is it possible that the known QC issues aren't being addressed because they have so many projects on the go that they lack the manpower to deal with product already released? I count the following N scale items currently in the pipeline but not yet released:NSC Centerbeam Bulkhead FlatACF Flexi Flo HopperProcor 5820 Covered HopperSanta Fe Mechanical ReeferNSC Barrel Ore HopperFive projects that are all new tooling. Is that a high number? Seems high to me, especially when you consider they probably have a greater number of all new tooling projects underway in HO as well.I didn't count the second run of the C40-8M in that tally since it's already been released, not new tooling. I really like the C40-8M, have three of them and plan to add two or three more from the second run, but I'm not pre-ordering them... the 73 Rapido products I currently have on order is about my limit. Unless they announce a C630M or M636........
While you may be happy with their business model, my reading of the newsletter is that they are not (at least in N scale).RE iconic Canadian prototypes: that certainly seems to be their business model with locos and passenger equipment (and that's fine), but less so with freight cars. For example, I don't view the centerbeams, the Auto-Floods, the B100 boxcar or the Flexi-Flo as being iconically Canadian, and those seem to be selling reasonably well. More power to them for running the barrel hoppers, but if they complain about poor sales for those, they're just not paying attention.I don't know how much they rely on pre-orders to manage their business, but I for one will not pre-order anything from them until I've seen pre-production samples. I waited to pull the trigger on a large centerbeam order until they posted samples a few months ago. (They look great!) In contrast, the GP20 tankers were a bit of a mess IMO (those railings and vents!):It didn't help that a bunch of them self-destructed in transit. That model seems like a classic case of not having enough control of the assembly process to pull off some aspects of their design; and that's the fault of the designer... (Rapido is by no means alone in this regard.)I am certainly looking forward to the centerbeams though!