0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So if Micro Engineering outsources their rail why did code 40 rail evaporate from the earth?
I'm hoping that they expand their line of switches in code 40 and code 55. If they did #4,#5,#6 and #8 it would certainly boost sales of the flex track. I think a lot of modellers pass over the flex track because they have no appetite for building switches, and that's a shame because ME flex looks so much better than Peco etc... Even if they supplied just the switch parts (frogs.point rails etc) I think it would boost their sales.
Well, now that the imported rail will cost 35% more than it did a week ago, better find all you can anywhere in stock here. This is really weird, I've never in my life before seen model train stuff caught up in a trade war. This will be interesting.
I spoke to one of the folks at the ME booth at the Rocky Mountain Train Show last weekend and she said the same thing. That they were getting into S scale and that was their top priority before tackling anything like adding more switches to N scale.
Allow for the possibility that maybe the Tomalco tooling is in production-ready shape, and it's something the new ME owners can use to generate income in the short term. Not like it's a huge market, but at least they'd have something to offer.The original ME track tooling, at least in N, was long-in-the-tooth, and the last runs under the previous ownership were "flashy". Can't speak to the HO lines.
The original ME track tooling, at least in N, was long-in-the-tooth, and the last runs under the previous ownership were "flashy". Can't speak to the HO lines.