0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Greetings folks. I am starting to look ahead to the holiday season and am interested in putting up a small, whimsical seasonal table top loop (and siding) onto a narrow piece of furniture we have, top dimensions are 60x14. All my N stuff is aimed at prototypically accurate, with the exception of the usaac nose art stuff from mt, so I am going to be on the hunt for extra engine and cars that can traverse a ludicrously small radius, that would only be used for this.So I was wondering if you fellas know of any power units I could start with? I am thinking of using Kato track, starting at 7.2" radius, then into 5.9" radius. Probably looking at something 4 axle eh?Appreciate any advice.
Exactly per my previous post... great minds. 😉
You didn't specify N or Z https://zscalehobo.com/marklin/81705.html
The Bachmann Peter Witt street car will take very tight radi just fine if you want to explore an America prototype street car.Bob
Getting back to the OP, and the question of small radius locomotives for a "holiday season....whimsical" train- what is the minimum radius for Thomas the Tank Engine? I have one of these on pre-order from Japan (shipping now delayed to mid-October, but will hopefully see it before Christmas). In my own case, it will run on a loop of Atlas 11" rad snap track, so I don't anticipate any issues. But can this engine meet the OP's criteria for radius? Or N scale Percy, which is an 0-4-0 ?
Quite right....originally I actually wanted to get Z. But then I decided I should focus and maybe be able to re-use SOME of the rolling stock I already have....the shorter cars.
That's a reasonable direction, and I appreciate the thought, however I should probably be more clear about my definition of whimsy, at least in this context. I won't be counting rivets, and will have seasonal (Halloween and Christmas) freight loads that may be slightly out of scale. But I would still like the power to at least vaguely look like the real thing. All, thanks for all the input! As I scour the interwebs for a 0-4-0 or 44T, I will still be open to other options. Not really married to any one thing yet.
Well, if not that whimsical, then I would also give a vote to the old Rivarossi 0-4-0 with tender. I had one for years- gave it up when I went to code 55.
In your initial post you mentioned MicroAce. I am not familiar with that reference. What is that?