Author Topic: Kato E7  (Read 3122 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

reinhardtjh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3150
  • Respect: +420
Kato E7
« on: August 27, 2020, 01:43:16 AM »
0
 A pre-production sample...

https://www.facebook.com/dufordmodelworks/posts/3399726763383167

Sorry it's on FaceBook.  Mabye @nightmare0331 will post a copy here.
John H. Reinhardt
PRRT&HS #8909
C&O HS #11530
N-Trak #7566

Leggy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 665
  • Respect: +48
« Last Edit: August 28, 2020, 10:50:04 AM by Leggy »

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11835
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2020, 08:39:24 AM »
+1
Kato photo: https://www.katousa.com/N/20thCentury/index.html


Interesting, the model has a "passenger pilot", while the photos of the units Kato is doing (4008, 4022) show them with "freight pilots":

4008 May 1970 http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/nyc/nyc4008a08.jpg
4022 May 1958 http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/nyc/nyc4022blr.jpg

Were both locos involved in grade accidents which resulted in them having freight pilots?

Mark
« Last Edit: August 27, 2020, 02:44:09 PM by Mark5 »


Point353

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3707
  • Respect: +909
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2020, 09:11:49 AM »
0

Interesting, the model has a "passenger pilot", while the photos of the units Kato is doing (4008, 4022) show them with "freight pilots":



4022: https://www.antiquesnavigator.com/d-2884085/dup-neg-new-york-central-nyc-4022-action-on-hudson-div-ny-1949.html
« Last Edit: August 27, 2020, 11:31:17 AM by Point353 »

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4365
  • Respect: +1263
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2020, 09:22:38 AM »
0
The very first ones had this on delivery...




Tom D.

I gave up rivet counting when I couldn't see an N scale rivet anymore.

nightmare0331

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 266
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +253
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2020, 10:41:53 AM »
0
I see someone 'borrowed' my Fakebook quick grab and go photo I posted yesterday then proceeded to add a watermark.

lol

ETA:  I'll post some more photos later here with the shell off and being converted to sound later today also.

Enjoy!

Kelley.
www.dufordmodelworks.com

Jbub

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Gender: Male
  • HP 9999
  • Respect: +609
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2020, 10:55:40 AM »
0
I see someone 'borrowed' my Fakebook quick grab and go photo I posted yesterday then proceeded to add a watermark.

lol


I would bet it was uploaded to the railwire photo library which automatically puts a watermark on it.
"Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!"

Darth Vader

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4365
  • Respect: +1263
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2020, 11:11:13 AM »
0
I see someone 'borrowed' my Fakebook quick grab and go photo I posted yesterday then proceeded to add a watermark.

lol

ETA:  I'll post some more photos later here with the shell off and being converted to sound later today also.

Enjoy!

Kelley.
www.dufordmodelworks.com
If you are talking about the one I posted above (with the Railwire watermark), I pulled it off a flickr page (not anyone's facebook) and posted here.  As suggested by Jbub, I assume the Railwire watermark is automated.  If you are the owner of the copyright, I do apologize. I am reasonably sure you were not the original photographer circa 1948, and if flickr provides such info, I did not find it on the page they showed me.
Edit....errrr.....nevermind....lol.  "Grab and go" has a whole other meaning in the neighborhood I grew up in.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2020, 11:41:48 AM by thomasjmdavis »
Tom D.

I gave up rivet counting when I couldn't see an N scale rivet anymore.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11835
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2020, 11:18:44 AM »
0
[humongous pic]

Yeah, my questions stands though.

Here is 4008 in 1953 with the passenger pilot: https://www.railpictures.net/photo/300556/

Mark


nightmare0331

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 266
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +253
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2020, 11:19:42 AM »
+2
If you are talking about the one I posted above (with the Railwire watermark), I pulled it off a flickr page (not anyone's facebook) and posted here.  As suggested by Jbub, I assume the Railwire watermark is automated.  If you are the owner of the copyright, I do apologize. I am reasonably sure you were not the original photographer circa 1948, and if flickr provides such info, I did not find it on the page they showed me.

Slow your roll.

I'm referring to the undecorated model picture.

Kelley.

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2020, 11:19:51 AM »
+1
I would bet it was uploaded to the railwire photo library which automatically puts a watermark on it.

Right.  If a person had put the watermark it would be more like this.



Jason

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11835
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2020, 11:30:58 AM »
+1
Back to the model, though - it looks nice. 8)

We can hope that Kato will over some other variations (down the road).

Mark


Jbub

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Gender: Male
  • HP 9999
  • Respect: +609
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2020, 11:31:17 AM »
0
Right.  If a person had put the watermark it would be more like this.



Jason
Lol,  nice!
"Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!"

Darth Vader

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4365
  • Respect: +1263
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2020, 11:36:19 AM »
0
Slow your roll.

I'm referring to the undecorated model picture.

Kelley.
Lol....can you tell I have NEVER, EVER, EVER been involved in copyright controversy?
Tom D.

I gave up rivet counting when I couldn't see an N scale rivet anymore.

nightmare0331

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 266
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +253
Re: Kato E7
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2020, 11:39:12 AM »
+1
Apparently I wasn't being clear enough on the marking of the photo in question.  That is my mistake.

I was pointing out the 'as seen on...' which is not part of every photo uploaded.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

This is the original.

Sorry for the confusion.

Warm regards,

Kelley.
www.dufordmodelworks.com