Author Topic: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars  (Read 1564 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10567
  • Respect: +1750
Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« on: September 07, 2019, 11:15:20 PM »
0
An online source said that the Reading had no PS-1 40 ft boxcars.  On the other hand, a side view of #107653 online seems to show PS ends. 
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/rsPicture.aspx?id=427286

Were these PS-1s, or did the RDG have them built with ends from PS, or is it just a trick of the photo angle?

Thank you.
N Kalanaga
Be well

Point353

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3709
  • Respect: +909

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9383
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6187
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2019, 12:28:26 AM »
0
This document also has class XMa information.  States they were ACF-built.

http://www.readingmodeler.com/images/rollingstock/boxcar/XMa.pdf
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10567
  • Respect: +1750
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2019, 02:05:17 AM »
0
Thank you.  So I will assume they did NOT have PS ends, and the photo just makes it look like they did.  These are the cars the CDS dry transfer sets are made for.

I do wonder about one line on the XMa PDF:
number    built      retired/reclassed       notes
107653   8-  -48   11- 9-62                became  C&O 29215

That's the car RRPictureArchives shows, in 1973, ACI label and all, reweighed RDG 3-71, still XMa, so it had to remain on the Reading until at least 1973.
N Kalanaga
Be well

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11840
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2019, 08:44:27 AM »
0
Based on the photographic evidence, I'd go with that C&O citation being wrong. :D


Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3825
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2019, 02:26:11 PM »
0
It's a proprietary Acf end, the model railroad term is Dartnaught. Unfortunately they are not avaliable in N scale, although you could create a close enough end by carving the smaller darts off a dreadnought end...

http://www.yarmouthmodelworks.com/uploads/ACL-24165.jpg

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2019, 02:46:31 PM »
0
It's a proprietary Acf end, the model railroad term is Dartnaught. Unfortunately they are not avaliable in N scale, although you could create a close enough end by carving the smaller darts off a dreadnought end...

http://www.yarmouthmodelworks.com/uploads/ACL-24165.jpg

That's not quite the same end I don't think.  I'm looking for a good shot but not finding much.

So far other cars that may have the same end are -

DTI -14000-14199




WLE - 23500-23749

No photos yet.

Jason


Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3825
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2019, 03:06:46 PM »
0
Ah so its the earlier version (the IDE equivilant)

Yarmouth model works makes both versions in HO.  (insert sigh  :P :trollface:)

http://www.yarmouthmodelworks.com/uploads/YMW-118.jpg

http://www.yarmouthmodelworks.com/index.php/ResinModelKits/Index

They refer to it as a "acf corregated end" , and call the later version a "acf carbuilders end" ...
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 03:11:01 PM by Missaberoad »

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10567
  • Respect: +1750
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2019, 12:46:36 AM »
0
Ryan:  Thank you!  I don't remember ever seeing, or hearing about, those ends.  As far as I know the GN and NP didn't have any of them.  From the side they do look like a PS-1 end, although the differences are obvious in the end view.

I think I'll stick with Intermountains regular Dreadnaught ends - carving all of those little pieces off looks like a real pain, especially for something most people will never notice.

Mark5:  That was my thought as well, so I'll go ahead and letter my car.

N Kalanaga
Be well

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2019, 11:26:38 AM »
0
I think this is the same end as the Reading car.





Jason

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10567
  • Respect: +1750
Re: Reading 1076xx XMa boxcars
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2019, 01:58:07 AM »
0
It looks like it. 
N Kalanaga
Be well