Author Topic: C636 coming from CESM  (Read 12177 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35273
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6642
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2017, 10:49:00 PM »
0
Unfortunately I can only upvote you once.

Jane

Thanks Jane - just living up to my reputation.  :D
Speaking of votes, I wonder why someone down-voted wcfn100, Missaberoad, and wazzou?!   :RUEffinKiddingMe: I found their posts humorous.  I'm going to fix that as soon as I post this.

So, what is the difference between C630 and C636?
. . . 42 . . .

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11418
  • Respect: +2875
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2017, 10:56:15 PM »
0
... So, what is the difference between C630 and C636?

Bigger intercooler is the most obvious, Hi-Ad trucks on most if not all, although (...IIRC...) a few late C630s may have had Hi-Ads as well. Also bigger radiator with an additional hump ahead of the radiator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALCO_Century_636

EDIT: I have conflicting information which could stand correction - the Liljestrand book, "ALCO Reference #1" declares all 630s had tri-mounts and all 636s had Hi-Ads.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2017, 11:03:14 PM by C855B »
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35273
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6642
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2017, 11:06:46 PM »
0
Bigger intercooler is the most obvious, Hi-Ad trucks on most if not all, although (...IIRC...) a few late C630s may have had Hi-Ads as well. Also bigger radiator with an additional hump ahead of the radiator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALCO_Century_636

EDIT: I have conflicting information which could stand correction - the Liljestrand book, "ALCO Reference #1" declares all 630s had tri-mounts and all 636s had Hi-Ads.

Thanks!  So there were only 63 of C636 ever made, owned by 5 7 railroads. Now I see why that this loco is a good candidate for a custom 3D-printed model.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2017, 11:08:17 PM by peteski »
. . . 42 . . .

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3829
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #18 on: June 14, 2017, 11:14:48 PM »
0
EDIT: I have conflicting information which could stand correction - the Liljestrand book, "ALCO Reference #1" declares all 630s had tri-mounts and all 636s had Hi-Ads.

Some N&W 630's had Trade in trucks from Trainmasters and some Reading 630's had Hi-Ads.

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/557133/

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/280082/

sirenwerks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6029
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +506
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2017, 11:46:24 PM »
0
The SP&S (and eventually BN) C636s had hi-adhesion trucks too.





FWIW, the drawing I posted was from Shapeways vendor Jess_Glz. I requested he do one since he already had a M630 out. He's working from these drawings:


« Last Edit: June 14, 2017, 11:59:27 PM by sirenwerks »
Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.

dcutting

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 359
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: -58
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2017, 11:59:35 PM »
0
David Cutting

nickelplate759

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3814
  • Respect: +1553
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2017, 12:07:08 AM »
0
It already looks better than the old Con-Cor / Roco one!
George
NKPH&TS #3628

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

Curtis Kyger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 172
  • Respect: +104
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2017, 12:26:14 AM »
0
Just to clarify, I think the prototypical road names would be:
1) Alco Demonstrator
2) Cartier Mining
3) Illinois Central
4) Penn Central
5) Conrail
6) SP&S
7) BN
8) Hamersley Iron
9) Mount Newman Mining
10) New York & Western Pennsylvania
11) Delaware Lackawanna

sirenwerks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6029
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +506
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #23 on: June 15, 2017, 01:08:08 AM »
0
Just to clarify, I think the prototypical road names would be:
1) Alco Demonstrator
2) Cartier Mining
3) Illinois Central
4) Penn Central
5) Conrail
6) SP&S
7) BN
 8) Hamersley Iron
9) Mount Newman Mining
10) New York & Western Pennsylvania
11) Delaware Lackawanna


CN and CP too, if you throw in Dofasco trucks.
Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3829
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #24 on: June 15, 2017, 01:09:06 AM »
+1

CN and CP too, if you throw in Dofasco trucks.

Their models were MLW built M-636, quite different animals...

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/324473/

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10577
  • Respect: +1755
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2017, 01:40:16 AM »
0
A little late, but I did recognize it.  Modeling the 1974 BN, I could use one, but as far as I know they never made it east of Spokane.  Any SP&S loco was an unusual sight in the Montana Rockies.
N Kalanaga
Be well

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9958
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2874
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2017, 01:53:21 AM »
0


Sure is smooth , I bet it will go real fast .


Richie Dost

unittrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1492
  • Respect: +148
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2017, 07:07:26 AM »
0
I'll take one, nice to see some more Alcos, would like to see a C425 in N also.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11418
  • Respect: +2875
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2017, 08:48:42 AM »
0
I'll take one, nice to see some more Alcos, would like to see a C425 in N also.

I'm rooting for an RS-27. It would be a snap-on, or nearly so, on an Atlas RS-11 chassis. If I didn't have a million other half-finished projects on my bench I'd take it on myself.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

randgust

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3246
  • Respect: +2925
    • Randgust N Scale Kits
Re: What Could This Be...
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2017, 08:52:21 AM »
0
That gray/black/white scheme was on a three-unit demo set that was all over the place.   It ran on the ATSF and reportedly blew some traction motor blowers, and that may be why they never ordered any.    But this is truly a case that if you really like these and your prototype never had any, do up the demonstrator set in the Alco scheme that was on the national tour.    And the two of them that were sold to M-K also had rather well-travelled histories and a nice paint scheme, make up a story to fit your layout.

This is in Barstow:  http://www.railpictures.net/photo/565213/

I always thought it was ironic that the Rowa/Con Cor models had about the same reputation for their scale as the real ones did for Alco.  Blew motors and smoked, yep, got that.

« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 09:46:12 AM by randgust »