Author Topic: Conrail 7182  (Read 3744 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2016, 05:14:24 PM »
+1
That is not excess paint.  That is excessive dirt and grease.  It is PC you know.   

P.s.  Paint the handrails.

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
  • Respect: +187
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2016, 05:37:12 PM »
0
The prototype CR 7182 was a Phase 3 GP9

http://www.k9mq.com/showPicture.aspx?id=181878

The model in the photo is a Phase 3 GP7, and off the top of my head, would probably closest to an ex-NYC Phase 2 GP7 with dynamic brakes and a winterization hatch:

http://www.k9mq.com/showPicture.aspx?id=492748

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2016, 07:41:01 PM »
0
Quote
It needs to be rerailed.  :P


jmarley76

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Respect: +137
    • WNCRails
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #18 on: June 22, 2016, 12:29:59 AM »
+1
Thanks to Ed's contribution, the Scale Trains "Game Changer" will now be a Phase 3 GP9 in the Conrail patch scheme...  :facepalm: :trollface:

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12336
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8562
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #19 on: June 22, 2016, 07:51:07 AM »
0
Damn.  Tough room.  It's a former Penn Central model; it's supposed to look like sh!t.  :trollface:

DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

MichaelWinicki

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2096
  • Respect: +335
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #20 on: June 22, 2016, 09:58:38 AM »
0
Damn.  Tough room.  It's a former Penn Central model; it's supposed to look like sh!t.  :trollface:

DFF

Valid point Dave!

I think you can accuse PC loco's of a lot of things... too much dirt... too much grease... too little maintenance... but too much paint?  Nah. :)

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
  • Respect: +187
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #21 on: June 22, 2016, 10:04:11 AM »
0
Thanks to Ed's contribution, the Scale Trains "Game Changer" will now be a Phase 3 GP9 in the Conrail patch scheme...  :facepalm: :trollface:

Will it come with a factory-applied coat of ex-PC dirt?

 :ashat: :trollface:
« Last Edit: June 22, 2016, 10:30:24 AM by cjm413 »

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26062
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11543
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #22 on: June 22, 2016, 10:05:38 AM »
0
Thanks to Ed's contribution, the Scale Trains "Game Changer" will now be a Phase 3 GP9 in the Conrail patch scheme...  :facepalm: :trollface:

Dude, I would love to have a Phase 3 GP9. The majority of the PRR fleet, including those ubersexy GP9Bs were those.

I know, there are options to do them, but I like fast and easy.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26062
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11543
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #23 on: June 22, 2016, 10:09:41 AM »
+1
Also, you're all right!

This little B is gonna go in the blender...

Not really, but you make good points.

This was actually a very old model, and might be my second model done during my Conrail renaissance, around 2003ish. I had bought the underlying model for something like $25 from, I want to say, Dale's Enginehouse, right there by CP Sheetz in Perdix PA, before it closed. It was painted black, with the hatch and the horn how they are. At the time I was modeling a freelance line so I was excited by the cheap power.

A few months later the Conrail bug bit, and I was like "eh, paint out time". Of course, it was before the days of http://conrailphotos.thecrhs.org/, so I kinda just winged it.

I basically keep it around for nostalgia's sake, and to trot out every once in a while when I want to do an early Conrail throwback, but I'm not investing much time into it. Hell, it doesn't even have a decoder in it.

If anything, I might just get a new GP9 shell and start from scratch. But if I do THAT, it might end up with some mating worms on it, and just keeping them.

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
  • Respect: +187
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2016, 12:16:06 PM »
+1
Also, you're all right!

This little B is gonna go in the blender...

Not really, but you make good points.

This was actually a very old model, and might be my second model done during my Conrail renaissance, around 2003ish. I had bought the underlying model for something like $25 from, I want to say, Dale's Enginehouse, right there by CP Sheetz in Perdix PA, before it closed. It was painted black, with the hatch and the horn how they are. At the time I was modeling a freelance line so I was excited by the cheap power.

A few months later the Conrail bug bit, and I was like "eh, paint out time". Of course, it was before the days of http://conrailphotos.thecrhs.org/, so I kinda just winged it.

I basically keep it around for nostalgia's sake, and to trot out every once in a while when I want to do an early Conrail throwback, but I'm not investing much time into it. Hell, it doesn't even have a decoder in it.

If anything, I might just get a new GP9 shell and start from scratch. But if I do THAT, it might end up with some mating worms on it, and just keeping them.

If you could remove the winterization hatch, it looks like CR did have some ex-RDG and ex-PRR Phase 3 GP7's with dynamic brakes (and no winterization hatches) per the pictures on pages 2-3

http://conrailphotos.thecrhs.org/ConrailEquipment/Locomotives/EMD/GP7GP9?page=1

If you wanted an excuse to buy a Bachmann Phase 2 GP7 with dynamic brakes (see link below), check out the photos of the ex-EL units while you're at it...

http://shop.bachmanntrains.com/index.php?main_page=popup_image&pID=2595&zenid=cj8ndu2ac3npod9pfru6rreup4
« Last Edit: June 22, 2016, 12:19:07 PM by cjm413 »

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26062
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11543
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2016, 03:55:33 PM »
0
At your urging, I did the yellow handrail thing today.



I think I like it.

coosvalley

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1427
  • Respect: +765
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2016, 03:59:27 PM »
0
I don't see any thick paint?...I think it was the photos, not the model, IMHO

Looks better with the yellow handrails!

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
  • Respect: +187
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2016, 05:27:03 PM »
0
At your urging, I did the yellow handrail thing today.



I think I like it.

If you decide to re-number it as an ex-NYC GP7, a bell on the long hood would be a relatively easy detail to add.

If you need more pictures aside from the picture of CR 5701, the Conrail Cyclopedia gives me a number series of 5686-5712:

http://crcyc.railfan.net/locos/misc/rosters/roster-76.html



Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26062
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11543
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2016, 05:36:15 PM »
0
If you decide to re-number it as an ex-NYC GP7, a bell on the long hood would be a relatively easy detail to add.

You'd think so, right? I did it on 5601.

But... The bell came from Sunrise, and I don't have any more of em.

I really, really miss SRE.

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
  • Respect: +187
Re: Conrail 7182
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2016, 05:55:34 PM »
0
You'd think so, right? I did it on 5601.

But... The bell came from Sunrise, and I don't have any more of em.

I really, really miss SRE.

Try Atlas or Miniatures by Eric