Author Topic: SD 40  (Read 1755 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

phil55

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 99
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +13
SD 40
« on: August 12, 2015, 01:48:56 PM »
0
What are the main spotting features between an SD 40 and an SD 40-2?
Phil

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6812
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1737
Re: SD 40
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2015, 01:59:46 PM »
0
Water sight glass on the engineer's side long hood for one.  Possibly some dustbin hatches or fans differ but I can't say for certain.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11430
  • Respect: +2903
Re: SD 40
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2015, 02:14:11 PM »
0
A semi-reliable spotting feature is a longer taper with an access hatch on the front of the dynamic brake blisters, for the extended (low-speed) dynamic brakes. While Dash-2's could be ordered the old style non-extended brakes and the regular blister (since the GP35), most roads bought the extended version. Anyway, the presence of the extended brakes is 99.99% Dash-2.

There were other visible features on the Dash-2 line that did not appear on the previous versions, such as snoot noses (110"?). IOW, the presence is positive ID of a Dash-2, but absence does not mean it's a non-Dash-2.

That's pretty confusing, but I hope you catch the concept.  :?
« Last Edit: August 12, 2015, 02:16:33 PM by C855B »
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11903
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +957
Re: SD 40
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2015, 02:14:44 PM »
0
Much larger "porch" on either end of the SD40-2.

Flexicoil trucks vs HTC trucks on the Dash 2.


C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11430
  • Respect: +2903
Re: SD 40
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2015, 02:18:26 PM »
0
Didn't IC have a handful of regular SD40's on SDP frames, and therefore also had longer porches? I think they did that for the longer fuel tanks, like EL did.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4600
  • Respect: +892
    • My train pics
Re: SD 40
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2015, 02:48:13 PM »
0
Didn't IC have a handful of regular SD40's on SDP frames, and therefore also had longer porches? I think they did that for the longer fuel tanks, like EL did.

SD40A's... 5000 gal fuel tanks IIRC. Went to CP, the buyer of old junk.

IC also had at least one SD40X, IC 6071... SD40 guts crammed onto an SD35 frame.

SD40-2 is ~3' longer than an SD40, which does make a significant visual difference when comparing side by side.

Spikre

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 580
  • Respect: 0
Re: SD 40
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2015, 03:09:33 PM »
0
 :)
  think it was GM&O with the SD40X,but became ICG later.
  IC had the Original SD45,former EMD Test and Demo unit.
  seem to think IC had the original GP40X on the GP35 frame ?
  not to be confused with the late 70s GP40Xs sent to different
  roads for Data by EMD.
  something soured Santa Fe on the GP40Xs,and they changed
  a Follow Up order to SD40-2s.
  EMD Demo/Test units were always interesting,like the original
  SD24 that tested on DM&IR for over a year.
       Spikre
        ;)
 

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6812
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1737
Re: SD 40
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2015, 03:38:24 PM »
0
Much larger "porch" on either end of the SD40-2.

Flexicoil trucks vs HTC trucks on the Dash 2.

Did the porch lengths differ?  I thought they both used the same 16 cylinder 645 on the same frame as the SD45 with the 20 cylinder, thus the shorter hoods and longer porches.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11903
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +957
Re: SD 40
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2015, 04:08:33 PM »
0
Did the porch lengths differ?  I thought they both used the same 16 cylinder 645 on the same frame as the SD45 with the 20 cylinder, thus the shorter hoods and longer porches.

Short answer: yes.

The frame used on the SD40-2 and SD45-2 is some 3' longer than the non-dash2 models (as pointed out above).

Mark


davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12392
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8763
Re: SD 40
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2015, 04:10:27 PM »
0
Water sight glass on the engineer's side long hood for one.  Possibly some dustbin hatches or fans differ but I can't say for certain.
Much larger "porch" on either end of the SD40-2.

Flexicoil trucks vs HTC trucks on the Dash 2.

^This and that.  My understanding is that the change in the truck design from Flexicoil to HT-C trucks required a longer truck, because the traction motors all face the same direction on the HT-C.  This required a longer frame, so the SD40-2 frame is approximately three feet longer than the SD40.  This allowed room for a longer hood, and the SD40-2's hood is approximately 18" longer than the SD40s.  The longer hood with an even longer frame is what created the spotting characteristic of the front and rear "porches" on the SD40-2.

DFF

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Member of the ACL & SAL RRs and the N&S Ry. Historical Societies

Spikre

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 580
  • Respect: 0
Re: SD 40
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2015, 05:58:12 AM »
0
 :)
   Flexi-Coil truck - 163" or 13'7" wheelbase.
   HT-C truck ----163.3/4" or 13'3/4" wheelbase,with the large rear Traction Motor Support.
   for comparision:
   GE FB-3 truck --163" or 13'7" wheelbase.
  Alco GSC Hi-Ad or Add -Hesion Truck-163" or 13' 7" wheel base
  originally the GE FB-3 was cast by GSC or ADK,later Buckeye then LFM continued the GSC
  design,but some say 90s FB-3s were cast by Atchison/Rockwell.
   EMD 1966 Test units:
   SD40X to GM&O 950,later ICG,then IC/CN.
   GP40X - to IC 3075, rebuilt to a GP35 eventually
   SD40X- 434B-434F to U.P.
     Spikre
       ;)

Spades

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 960
  • Respect: +218
Re: SD 40
« Reply #11 on: August 15, 2015, 07:51:59 PM »
0
Some SD40-2 had exhaust silencer.  Did the SD40 ever come with an exhaust silencer?

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11430
  • Respect: +2903
Re: SD 40
« Reply #12 on: August 15, 2015, 07:56:00 PM »
0
IIRC, I don't think so. The first EMD-issue silencers were on SDP40Fs, and by that point the Dash-2's were production. I specifically remember various members of my railfan clique cussing and discussing the "slush boxes" on the new Amtrak power, and why couldn't they just leave "glorious noise" alone.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Spades

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 960
  • Respect: +218
Re: SD 40
« Reply #13 on: August 15, 2015, 08:43:23 PM »
0
I thought the exhaust silencer had something also to do with emission controls.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11430
  • Respect: +2903
Re: SD 40
« Reply #14 on: August 15, 2015, 09:01:34 PM »
0
Nope. EPA wasn't even looking at non-road diesels until 1985. Silencers were noise abatement only.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.