Author Topic: 1/29 vs. N  (Read 3822 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10916
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +998
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
1/29 vs. N
« on: January 05, 2014, 07:31:11 PM »
0
I was about to start a new 1/29 project when I remembered that I did a similar hopper in N scale.  I took it out for a quick size comparison:





Pardon the quality of the photos - I don't have a good place to photograph the large stuff yet. :tommann:


MichaelT

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 484
  • Respect: +1
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2014, 09:20:37 PM »
0
Good looking hopper. Is that Aristocraft or USA trains?

Gozer the Gozerian

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1798
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1102
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2014, 11:54:12 AM »
0
Like!
Gozer the Traveler. He will come in one of the pre-chosen forms. During the rectification of the Vuldrini, the traveler came as a large and moving Torg! Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the McKetrick supplicants, they chose a new form for him: that of a giant Slor!

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12025
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +157
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2014, 01:48:39 PM »
0
 Damn I want to do 1:29!
I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1439
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +493
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2014, 02:29:43 PM »
0
Doing my short line in 1/29th would be fun, but dangggggg would it take up a lot of space
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 31842
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +4613
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2014, 02:46:21 PM »
0
Damn I want to do 1:29!

You have decent size layout room and haven't put down any N scale track.  There is still time to go BIG!  :trollface:
. . . 42 . . .

Kevin Yutz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Male
  • G Scale Pro, HO Scale too
  • Respect: +1
    • Conrail Historical Society
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2014, 09:58:45 PM »
0
Damn Tom, I didnt know you did any 1/29th stuff at all.

If you ever need any fodder to work your magic on, hit a brotha up!  1/29th is my primary scale....mostly modern era stuff, prolly over 100 pcs of rolling stock and like 12 locos by now. 

Hell my layout shows up on google earth...haha :D

And Ian quit your bitching, you have a yard...GET TO IT!

« Last Edit: April 25, 2014, 10:03:44 PM by Kevin Yutz »

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4723
  • Respect: +1665
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2014, 10:44:21 PM »
0
Proto:29?   That would be cool!   8)

Ed

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12025
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +157
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2014, 10:32:53 AM »
0
And Ian quit your bitching, you have a yard...GET TO IT!

Yeah no....my yard is for my immaculate grass, not trains!
I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

Baronjutter

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 509
  • Respect: +11
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2014, 10:33:53 AM »
0
A crop of trains is a far better harvest than a crop of grass clippings.

VonRyan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3077
  • Gender: Male
  • Running on fumes
  • Respect: +608
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2014, 12:44:32 PM »
0
As my grandfather always said: "We're raising kids, not grass."


-Cody F.
Cody W Fisher  —  Wandering soul from a bygone era.
Tired.
Fighting to reclaim shreds of the past.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10674
  • Respect: +2288
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2014, 01:05:25 PM »
0
Oh, I dunno. I'm with Ian. I find that a neat lawn and the process of getting it there is very zen.

However - full disclosure here - the lawn surrounding our layout building affords the opportunity to do satisfying yard work and watch trains. I must've seen at least four trains in the roughly one hour spent overseeding the other day, including a rare same-direction pass. CN was busy.

Kevin Yutz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Male
  • G Scale Pro, HO Scale too
  • Respect: +1
    • Conrail Historical Society
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2014, 08:35:41 PM »
0
Yeah no....my yard is for my immaculate grass, not trains!

I hate mowing my damn yard so you grass hippies can have that! 

BRING ON MOAR TRAINS!

Wonder if I could fit a 1/29th humpyard in my back yard....hmmmmmm

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10929
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +8552
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2014, 08:40:04 PM »
0
I've got a bunch of gravel with nothing else going on so I don't even need to sacrifice grass.  It's choo-choo time!


Kevin Yutz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Male
  • G Scale Pro, HO Scale too
  • Respect: +1
    • Conrail Historical Society
Re: 1/29 vs. N
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2014, 08:45:27 PM »
0
See Ian? 

If Vollmer does it, you damn well better too.....

Yeah thats it.....right.... :D