Author Topic: Crude oil derailment, fire  (Read 9259 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4208
  • Respect: +583
    • My train pics
Crude oil derailment, fire
« on: July 06, 2013, 10:05:08 AM »
0

Dave Schneider

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2377
  • Respect: +50
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2013, 03:29:11 PM »
0
Wow. The initial reports are that this was an unattended runaway. It will be really interesting to see how this turns out. What a shame for the town of Lac Mégantic

Best wishes, Dave
If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7024
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2013, 07:15:21 AM »
0
Things are not good. At least 30 buildings have been flattened. One confirmed death, but as many as 60 are still missing, and a search cannot yet begin as the fire is still burning and crews have not been able to reach the center of town.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323899704578589460837041312.html

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8803
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1527
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2013, 07:41:29 AM »
0
It may be an unintended runaway, but the story linked initially talks only about the conductor. Where is the engineer?
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.

"Yes there are somethings that are "off;" but hey, so what." ~ Wyatt

"I'm trying to have less cranial rectal inversion with this." - Ed K.

"There's more to MRR life than the Wheezy & Nowheresville." C855B

Dave Schneider

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2377
  • Respect: +50
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2013, 11:04:39 AM »
0
Is  possible that they only have a one person crew? This is an Ed Burkhardt line, and when he ran the Wisconsin Central they tried very hard to reduce crew size. Not trying to slander Mr. Burkhardt, just wondering if anyone knows.

Terrible tragedy.

Best wishes, Dave
« Last Edit: July 07, 2013, 02:55:16 PM by Dave Schneider »
If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6298
  • Respect: +1813
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2013, 12:24:12 PM »
0
The WSJ article that DKS links to says it ran away during a crew change outside of town.  So either it was not tied down properly or there was a brake malfunction (or both).  The engineer claims to have followed the usual procedures prior to disembarking the train.  Crew size does not seem to be an issue.

Tragic situation that it happened to derail right in the heart of a small town.  I have to believe that everyone on the MM&A is sick about it.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2013, 12:26:43 PM by GaryHinshaw »

trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1871
  • Respect: +90
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2013, 01:30:23 PM »
0
The accident occured around 1:00 am . Somebody took a video of the loco having an internal fire where the crew is changing in Nantes about 12 km. away @ 11:20 pm about 2 hours before .
The guy who shot the video with his cell phone said on tv there was quite a few people ( RR employees ) around the leading loco trying to extinguish it . Could that have done something to the brakes while parked ...
It is now known there was nobody on board when it derailed .
There is still a lot of people missing about 60 and 5 deads .



This is the press release from MMA :
http://www.mmarail.com/sections/news/files/MMA_7.6.2013_Press.Release.pdf
« Last Edit: July 07, 2013, 01:37:49 PM by trainforfun »
Thanks ,
Louis



nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9646
  • Respect: +1325
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2013, 12:28:37 AM »
0
Another Canadian report said that the train "detached from the locomotives".  If true, that sounds like vandalism, as a parked train shouldn't uncouple itself.  And if it was deliberate, there's no reason whoever did couldn't have released the handbrakes and/or bled off the air first.
N Kalanaga
Be well

Specter3

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 856
  • Respect: +149
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2013, 06:45:43 PM »
0
Is this guy right in how air brakes work on a train? I got my bus license and this is not how bus airbrakes work. You have working air pressure that allows you to roll and apply the brakes. But as soon as that pressure bleeds off if you have a line brake or both pumps go down you are stopping weather you want to or not.

http://www.treehugger.com/energy-disasters/what-caused-train-disaster-not-brake-failure.html


Dave Schneider

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2377
  • Respect: +50
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2013, 07:14:47 PM »
0
I believe that the article has the air brakes portion correct. There is some conjecture, and some political viewpoint offered, but it isn't exactly unfounded (but let's not go there, please). I would be surprised that a train could be left unattended without tying a fair number of cars down with the hand brakes. It is not clear whether this was the case, and/or whether that is the MMA operating rules....I'll let more qualified people answer that. What an awful tragedy.

Best wishes, Dave
If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4208
  • Respect: +583
    • My train pics
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2013, 07:33:41 PM »
0
Very recently I witness as RR crew setting out of their train in a siding as part of an over-siding capacity meet. The Conductor walked the cut tying on handbrakes on a number of cars. I'm fairly certain it is still required by the rulebook to apply handbrakes to standing cars / trains, which is why so many cars have flat spots as one and two man switching crews will drag cars without releasing the handbrake to save time.

central.vermont

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2618
  • Gender: Male
  • Jon
  • Respect: +145
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2013, 07:38:37 PM »
0
Haven't seen this link posted here yet. It's in French but you the pictures need no statements.

Jon


http://www.spiq.ca/v2/ailleurs/2013_07_06_Incendie_Lac-Megantic/index.html


DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7024
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2013, 07:47:46 PM »
0
Haven't seen this link posted here yet. It's in French but you the pictures need no statements.

Jon


http://www.spiq.ca/v2/ailleurs/2013_07_06_Incendie_Lac-Megantic/index.html

Um... not that I'm anxious to see graphic images of the carnage, but... there are no pics at that link.

central.vermont

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2618
  • Gender: Male
  • Jon
  • Respect: +145
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2013, 08:00:10 PM »
0
:o Wow! Was just looking at these about 30 minutes ago too. Seems they have been removed?


davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6785
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2013, 08:12:27 PM »
0
:o Wow! Was just looking at these about 30 minutes ago too. Seems they have been removed?


A picture may be worth 1000 words, but, clearly, 1000 words is not necessarily worth a picture . . . especially in a foreign language.   :trollface:

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!