Author Topic: History Question: The Wilgus Agreement  (Read 1279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

shark_jj

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 309
  • Respect: +743
History Question: The Wilgus Agreement
« on: April 29, 2012, 10:10:24 AM »
0
Hello all, after a 2 year sojourn into building an HO Modular Layout I am back to working on my home N Scale layout.  The PRR Allegheny Division is giving way to the proto-freelanced Grand Trunk Southern which runs from the Buffalo Gateway to New York City allowing CN access to eastern U.S. markets in the same manner as GTW allowed access to Chicago.  In doing research for the railroad I wondered how prototypical it would be to have CN power running south on the GTS and remembered from my railfan experiences in the late 60's early 70's seeing very little Canadian power south of the border other than as transfers at the gateways.  Similarly, I knew that roads like Wabash and Pere Marquette (C&O) had dedicated "Canadian" units.  My question was how prototypical would it be if I ran CN units to my main yard which is loosely based on Salamanca in the B&O years.

Research uncovered something known as "The Wilgus Agreement".  Negotiated in 1922 by William J. Wilgus who had been Chief Engineer of the NYC at the turn of the century and responsible for such engineering feats as Grand Central Terminal and the electrification under the Hudson and the Detroit Tunnels under the St. Clair River.  Wilgus moved on to handle the rail network in France during WW1 and then went into consulting.  It was as a consultant that he negotiated an agreement between the Canadian and U.S. Governments in 1922 that allowed locomotives to enter the other country and stay for a period of 72 hours without the payment of any duties or taxes.  What this meant for CN was that GTW locos on passenger trains such as The Maple Leaf could run from Chicago to Toronto right through as long as they returned to the U.S. within 72 hours of their departure.  Similarly, CN locomotives could run through from Toronto to Chicago as long as they were turned around quickly and left the U.S. within the 72 hour period. 

I also know from first hand experience that both CN and CP extensively used leased power from lines such as B&O/C&O, IC, Bessemer, B&M, etc. in the period 1970-1974.  I'm unclear how that worked. 

Today, run through power is common and we often see units from BNSF, WC, SOO Line, and others such as NS and UP up here in Ontario.  I tried to research this as well by looking at sites such as the FRA in the U.S. and Canada Customs.  I was able to find a Remission Order signed here in Canada in November 1974 that appears to excuse duty or taxes on railroad locomotives as long as they are used in direct service between points in Canada and the U.S.  This meant that they could not be diverted and used on a train between two Canadian points, however, it would also appear to negate the 72 hour deadline.  A review of the provisions of NAFTA signed in 1989 would appear to reinforce this as being the current status quo.  If that were true then CN units operating on U.S. Lines must be dedicated U.S. units and the same would apply to CP units working on the old D&H.

I would be interested if anyone else had thought about this and had additional information they could share on how this system worked both in the period around 1970 and today.  I am also interested in whether The Wilgus Agreement is still in effect or whether it has been superceded. 

John

John

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2684
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +139
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: History Question: The Wilgus Agreement
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2012, 03:20:27 PM »
0
I don't know much about this Wilgus Agreement (never heard the name before) but prior to the various free trade agreements CN's American lines (GT, GTW, CV, DWP) were operated as independent subsidiaries. CN units might make occasional visits, but the GTS would have it's own locomotives and rolling stock. Your cross-border traffic from Canada will feature lots of proper CN cars and lots of International Service-only cars with CNIS, CNA, CVC and DWC markings. CV, DWP and GTW marks were basically American domestic, so in theory you could operate a mix of GTW and GTS cars in your domestic service.

C&O and NYC had operations in Ontario and for these operations they ordered locomotives that were built by EMD's Canadian susidiary plant and permanently assigned to Canada. Burlington Northern had an isolated operation in Manitoba with a similar arrangement. A single unit was permanently assigned to the operation (I don't know if it was Canadian built or imported)

Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +247
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: History Question: The Wilgus Agreement
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2012, 09:39:14 PM »
0
I also know from first hand experience that both CN and CP extensively used leased power from lines such as B&O/C&O, IC, Bessemer, B&M, etc. in the period 1970-1974.  I'm unclear how that worked. 


I know that the CP used leased power from he CGW in both 69-70 and 70-71 and it was arranged directly with the CNW (who owned the CGW by that time I assume) The lease was the same as if done through the leasing company and there was no challenge to the Wilgus Agreement because at least equal power was building at the time. I got that from a CP road foreman of the period.

Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!

shark_jj

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 309
  • Respect: +743
Re: History Question: The Wilgus Agreement
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2012, 10:17:08 PM »
0
Mike, it sounds like there may have been exceptions granted due to a shortage of power and as you indicate, new power had been ordered.  Undoubtedly with limitations such as when new locomotives were delivered, equal horsepower had to be returned to the U.S. etc.  CV_ACR, I am familiar with the "canadian" locos of the Wabash, C&O, and NYC as I railfanned those lines back in the day.  I also know that NYC and C&O ran through units from Detroit to Buffalo.  NYC and later PC also ran units in from Buffalo to Toronto on the TH&B on the daily transfer The Starlight.  One of my favorite trains to railfan since almost anything could show up on it from E8's and 9's to RS3's, RSD4/5's and GP9B's. 
John