Author Topic: Trainworx 86' Boxars  (Read 4941 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pfs

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 571
  • HPI 1975-?
  • Respect: +5
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2009, 06:27:14 PM »
0
Steven

Are you going to sell undecs? I found one vendor that has them, let me know if you are going to, pm if you perfer.

Yes , the Undecs should be on site soon.

ww.nscaleintermodalstore.net

We sold out of our first shipment, and have another coming from a different distributor. Trainworx acknowledged some  print/paint issues and rejected the Santa Fe and Chessie System cars from the Factory - so those roadnames are delayed. MOST- of the other roadnames seem to be OK, but we are trying to check them.

Steven


Thanks!  I cleaned out MBK before you replied but I will review once I need more.

Thanks

-paul

CONRAIL FAN

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 87
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +12
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2009, 07:25:48 PM »
0
Mine cam today printing was good on the cars. But same issue with the couplers hanging down pretty low. Are they the correct couple height or too low?
JEROME

sundowner

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1266
  • Respect: +148
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2009, 10:56:26 PM »
0
I got mine today. I dig how they are closer couple than the my Buford cars. I put FVM wheels on them and put them to work. The truck and couplers are the same MT ones that are use on the RC Racks and MT racks and 89' flats.
Which ever side of the track I am on is the right side.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11858
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +932
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #18 on: August 08, 2009, 01:13:46 PM »
0
I got mine today. I dig how they are closer couple than the my Buford cars.

I believe the Bluford cars may be more correct, as these cars have cushion underframes, with extended couplers:


(this is not a thrall though)

I just picked 3 N&Ws this morn (2 blues and a black).

The couplers do hang down a little (similar to other cars equiped with this truck mounted coupler).

They come with MT low pro wheel sets.

WARNING - screws for body mounting couplers are loose in the box (one fell out when I was opening one of the boxes).

Out of the box, overall height is in line with the Blufords.

Detail levels are high, application of details is good but sometimes a tiny bit off.

Paint quality is a bit off on the blues, with uneven coverage (slight but noticeable to my eye). The coverage on the black one is good. Pad printing not as good as Blufords, with two being very good and one of the blues not as "crisp".

The lettering is very shiney.

A bit of weathering will "cure" the shine for me.

Overall I am happy with them, they have that low slung look compared to some of the "high water" models we've been provided to us in the past.

Mark 8)




Atlanticflier

  • Guest
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #19 on: August 08, 2009, 02:12:20 PM »
0
THRALLS - Coupler Reference photos:





extended   ?    or just cushioned.....




Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11858
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +932
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2009, 02:21:51 PM »
0
semantics


Atlanticflier

  • Guest
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #21 on: August 08, 2009, 02:41:22 PM »
0
semantics

no,  seriously. I think that there is cushioned coupler pockets and then extended cushioned that sticks out farther.  I was asking the question ?

Maybe the hydralic version doesn't stick out like the sprung draft gear versions ? 

 Either way the Trainworx cars does not seem to have the 'boxed' look of cushioned couplers. I'll have to check to see which  body mount M-t coupler # will fix this.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2009, 02:57:25 PM by Atlanticflier »

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11858
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +932
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #22 on: August 08, 2009, 03:14:40 PM »
0
Either way the Trainworx cars does not seem to have the 'boxed' look of cushioned couplers. I'll have to check to see which  body mount M-t coupler # will fix this.

Ok, I agree.  8)


pfs

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 571
  • HPI 1975-?
  • Respect: +5
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #23 on: August 08, 2009, 08:53:13 PM »
0
I'll have to check to see which  body mount M-t coupler # will fix this.

Please do, and post info! thanks.

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #24 on: August 08, 2009, 09:31:23 PM »
0
Someobdy needs to measure the wheelbase of the Trainworx Thrall...

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2009, 10:51:04 PM »
0
From the data I have there's about a 4-7 inch longer difference (or 8" to 1' 2" longer overall) depending on cushioning device used... that's for Greeneville, Thrall and P-S cars. 

pfs

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 571
  • HPI 1975-?
  • Respect: +5
Re: Trainworx 86' Boxars
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2009, 02:16:52 PM »
0
Steven

Are you going to sell undecs? I found one vendor that has them, let me know if you are going to, pm if you perfer.

Yes , the Undecs should be on site soon.

ww.nscaleintermodalstore.net

We sold out of our first shipment, and have another coming from a different distributor. Trainworx acknowledged some  print/paint issues and rejected the Santa Fe and Chessie System cars from the Factory - so those roadnames are delayed. MOST- of the other roadnames seem to be OK, but we are trying to check them.

Steven

I had to unearth this thread and thank Steven again...he put these on sale and then shipped by 9am after I ordered in the middle of the night.

Super service!