0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Haven't we been through this before?
Sorry!!!! Mr. Moderator, feel free to delete!
Quote from: ljudice on December 11, 2008, 10:05:26 PMSorry!!!! Mr. Moderator, feel free to delete! The Post or Postee ?? ;D
Quote from: bobcat on December 11, 2008, 10:01:29 PMHaven't we been through this before?once, at least:http://therailwire.net/smf/index.php/topic,17008.0.html
Also, you've no doubt noticed a difference in quality from Atlas and IMRC stuff coming from Sanda Kan. This is because each has it's own completely separate factory and workers, so though they're assembled by the same compnay, the results can be quite different.
Quote from: Erik W on December 12, 2008, 09:18:03 AMAlso, you've no doubt noticed a difference in quality from Atlas and IMRC stuff coming from Sanda Kan. This is because each has it's own completely separate factory and workers, so though they're assembled by the same compnay, the results can be quite different.Thank you for explaining this. I've wondered about this for years. So, can I guess that one of these is a cheaper, entry-level factory (where glue and fingerprints are common), and the other is more expensive?
The QC difference between the Trinitys and, say, the 4750 hoppers is like night and day (or day and night in this case). The only issue I've ever had with a Trinity is a loose weight, but they're otherwise quite predictable (one of my favorite N scale cars). I won't buy a 4750 without seeing it first to check for roof-walk bulges, crooked end frames, etc. I'd just assume it be a kit in this case.