Author Topic: iHobby  (Read 3354 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ljudice

  • Guest
iHobby
« on: October 18, 2008, 12:00:21 AM »
0
Report over at Trainboard.com

Not worth repeating - Asarge was right - no spectacular news at all... In fact I don't think there was any actual news, just confirmation of delivery delays.

My money is overcommitted anyway with the C40's and the SD70ACE's.

Lou


cfritschle

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1347
  • Respect: +357
    • N Scale Vehicle Association
Re: iHobby
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2008, 12:45:27 AM »
0
Lou,

But Pete missed the bus!  The Classic Metal Works GMC TD 3610 that is.   :)

http://www.walthers.com/exec/newproducts/cr/200810/Vehicles

You need to scroll down a bit to see it.

Carter
Carter

N Scale Vehicle Association
"For the modeler and collector of 1:160 scale model vehicles and equipment"
http://nscalevehicles.org/

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: iHobby
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2008, 08:00:27 AM »
0
Glad for ya' Carter and the Vehicle guys. For me,  that's not much to be excited about. No complaints though, I've had a pretty darn good year for new stuff.

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: iHobby
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2008, 08:29:43 AM »
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNPNLG8dzE0

Walthers You Tube videoshowing new products. Not much but at about 4:20 they show the New Wooden Coaling Tower and then the bus. The version is older than I thought.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11818
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +918
Re: iHobby
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2008, 09:41:44 AM »
0
Good news for the bussers. 8)


inkaneer

  • Guest
Re: iHobby
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2008, 10:29:35 AM »
0
From my memory I'm guessing the bus to be a mid to late 50's design?

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: iHobby
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2008, 11:12:23 AM »
0
You transition era guys will like this. Actually produced 1946-49. Used probably into the mid-late 60's.

Here is a link to the production lists

http://www.omot.org/roster/GMOldLookList/index.html

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11818
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +918
Re: iHobby
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2008, 02:43:52 PM »
0
Hey, Model Railroader asleep again?

They list a Concor Airslide as a new N release:

http://www.trains.com/mrr/default.aspx?c=a&id=2773



Looks suspiciously HO HO HO ...


FrankCampagna

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 999
  • Respect: 0
Re: iHobby
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2008, 10:08:49 PM »
0
Quote
They list a Concor Airslide as a new N release:

ls this the same prototype Atlas produced years ago?

Frank
"Once I built a railroad, made it run......."

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: iHobby
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2008, 11:51:48 PM »
0
It looks like an HO model, and the description is surely HO - but yes, Atlas has done this exact car in "N".

I hate to say this, but Model Railroader is really worthless when almost all of us knew more about the forthcoming releases and are able to easily spot their typos.

Also note they are missing the big N-scale announcements - the C40-8W, the Walthers steamer, and the bus.

I mean what is the POINT of having WRITERS and being a MAGAZINE when you don't get it even half right.

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: iHobby
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2008, 08:31:08 AM »
0
Model Railroader and most periodicals just cannot get the info out there faster than the internet.

The steamer isn't really news except that they have delayed delivery due to QC issues.

I wonder what new model Matt said we might see at trainfest from FVM?

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7027
Re: iHobby
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2008, 08:34:18 AM »
0
Model Railroader and most periodicals just cannot get the info out there faster than the internet.

Thing is, there are a lot of modelers out there who do not have Internet access, so periodicals are all they have. What's more frustrating than the time lag is the poor quality of the information, and those who are not online have no way of finding out what's accurate or not.

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: iHobby
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2008, 11:45:51 AM »
0
Wait a second! Model Railroader's WEBSITE (on the Internet) was what I was talking about - not the magazine.

They can't even get timely information out on the web. What is with that?

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +24
Re: iHobby
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2008, 12:05:04 PM »
0
Quote
Wait a second! Model Railroader's WEBSITE (on the Internet) was what I was talking about - not the magazine.

They can't even get timely information out on the web. What is with that?

In my experience, even periodicals w/websites are not always the fastest or most accurate. BESIDES, remember, they generally update off of press releases on a set date....sooooo even then there is a delay.


Quote
Thing is, there are a lot of modelers out there who do not have Internet access, so periodicals are all they have. What's more frustrating than the time lag is the poor quality of the information, and those who are not online have no way of finding out what's accurate or not.

That's very true, but in my experiance at the LHS and clubs, I have that most generally get the info well before they read about it. Seeing it in the mags OR when the info sheets are displayed at the shop helps validate or repudiate what they have heard.

Denver Road Doug

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2120
  • Respect: +29
    • Mockingbird Industrial
Re: iHobby
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2008, 01:43:24 PM »
0
Keep in mind that MR can't just read-and-relay EVERYTHING that gets "announced" on the Internet.  I'm sure they have protocols involved in making product announcements to ensure QUALITY of information.  (granted, they *possibly* bungled up the online Con-Cor announcement in this case....in general MR does post accurate info in their printed formats.)  This is kinda along the lines of Atlas' policies about announcements on their forums.  It's easy to go to shows and then jump on the Internet and report what you saw--or think you saw--but MR cannot simply cut-and-paste the rumor mill into their publications.  I'm sure they require at a minimum some official announcement from the manufacturer.

To put it in perspective, ask yourself the next time you post a "scoop" about a product: "do I have enough confidence in the validity of this information to bet my job on it?".
NOTE: I'm no longer active on this forum.   If you need to contact me, use the e-mail address (or visit the website link) attached to this username.  Thanks.