Author Topic: Road width question  (Read 2782 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Erik W

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1019
  • Respect: +796
Road width question
« on: April 29, 2008, 09:12:50 AM »
0
Anyone have any idea what the typical width would be for a paved two lane road in the '50s?  This would be a road with a painted center line.

Thanks,
Erik

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9951
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2863
Re: Road width question
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2008, 09:21:01 AM »
0
At least 3 cars wide would be a good rule of thumb I guess .


Richie Dost

dnhouston

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +831
    • Dusty Junction & Northwestern
Re: Road width question
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2008, 09:24:33 AM »
0
I read somewhere 10 feet per lane, so a two lane road is 20 feet or 1.5 inches in N scale

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9951
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2863
Re: Road width question
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2008, 09:46:03 AM »
0


Richie Dost

3rdrail

  • Guest
Re: Road width question
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2008, 10:05:15 AM »
0

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5384
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: Road width question
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2008, 10:16:01 AM »
0
Anyone have any idea what the typical width would be for a paved two lane road in the '50s?  This would be a road with a painted center line.

Thanks,
Erik

24' for a rural cross section (no curb/gutter)

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9951
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2863
Re: Road width question
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2008, 10:28:56 AM »
0
I guess the answer is , it depends . As late as 1997 it states 9 foot lanes min on this .

http://www.frcog.org/pubs/transportation/DesignAlternatives/ch4.PDF


Richie Dost

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12034
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +167
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: Road width question
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2008, 02:33:10 PM »
0
Concrete sectional roads in NH in the 50's were 10' lanes with a dirt shoulder. Current roads are 12' lanes with  6' paved shoulders.
I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Road width question
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2008, 03:11:26 PM »
0
FWIW -  Iowa highways did have curbs on their 18' and 20' pavings which weren't all removed until 1980.  And until the early 50's the center line was actually black.


Jason

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12331
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8544
Re: Road width question
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2008, 09:57:58 PM »
0
Looks to be 4 bears long in width here .

http://www.nps.gov/archive/yell/slidefile/mammals/blackbear/Images/14072.jpg

LOL!  Richie (up1950s) is right.  A 1950s road is definitely four or five bears wide.  But that raises a second question: how long is a bear? ;D  Great pic, Richie!

Dave Foxx
Rising Sun, Maryland



A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

Greyryder

  • Guest
Re: Road width question
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2008, 05:16:57 PM »
0
*holds hands apart* They're about so long.

Walkercolt

  • Guest
Re: Road width question
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2008, 09:15:00 PM »
0
Depends on what part of the country you're in. Having driven a semi (88" wide minus mirrors) down 10' wide lane streets(holding my breath all the way) and 18' wide lane streets, and in Texas where "Farm market" roads have about 22' wide lanes in the Panhandle with lane width shoulders, it varies ALOT. Roads built for wagons or Model T's will make a plaster saint of a trucker into an SOB in ten miles. The length they give a semi to park in at terminals varies too. When you have a warehouse built for 40' trailers and you've got a 53'er, you learn to say new words.... :-X An inch and a-half looks wide on most layouts...it's a decent compromise.

daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6443
  • Respect: +1427
Re: Road width question
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2008, 05:15:21 PM »
0
I good rule of thumb is 10-12' per lane PLUS 6" for each yellow and white line with 6" seperating yellow lines.

Highways are usially 14-15' wide in the travel lane and may be as narrow as 12' for passing lanes.

Rail crossinga should have a crossbuck no closer than 15' from the nearest rail. 150' out you should have the yellow warning sign. 100-150 for in roadway painted sign.
American eyes, American eyes
View the world from American eyes
Bury the past, rob us blind
And leave nothing behind

RS-27

  • Guest
Re: Road width question
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2008, 03:23:44 AM »
0
When I started driving (in NJ) in the 60's, there were plenty of roads that were 12 ' wide or less... Out here in Hideho, there are still a goodly number of 'improved' gravel logging roads where , when confronted by a BIG Kenworth log truck, you back up a mile or so to let him by.

In particular, I remember roads west of Morristown, NJ that had radius' that were less than 40'.

Bob in IDaho