Author Topic: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier  (Read 3217 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gdmichaels

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 61
  • Gender: Male
  • The Accidental Collector
  • Respect: +27
    • N Scale Database
Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« on: August 24, 2016, 02:25:02 PM »
+1
The TroveStar N-Scale Model Trains Database now features Vert-A-Pac Auto Carriers http://www.trovestar.com/general/blog/blog.php?Article=27. Here is some background information on this uniquely American innovation that entered service in April 1970.

Aimed at reducing shipping costs, the 89' 4" long Vert-A-Pac automobile carrier transported thirty sub-compact cars in the same cubic space as a conventional tri-level auto rack, which could only transport eighteen vehicles.

Cooperatively developed by ACF and the Southern Pacific to transport General Motors upcoming Chevrolet Vega models from their points of manufacture to US distributors, the Vert-A-Pac was designed to transport thirty of the new sub-compact automobiles in a vertical, rather than a horizontal position.

Parked on one of three spots that were located on ten bottom hinged doors, which doubled as ramps and numbered five per body side, each Vega was secured; then, in groups of three, were stood on end (nose down) within the Vert-A-Pac body after each door was lifted into a closed position using a forklift truck.

Transporting automobiles in a nose-down position is no small engineering feat, as the issues of fluids (e.g., battery, gasoline, oil, and windshield wiper) retention and potential transport damage to engines and transmissions had to be considered.

Not only rostered by the Southern Pacific, Southern Railway, and Illinois Central (whose cars bore home road lettering and reporting marks), Vert-A-Pac bodied mineral red or yellow flatcars with TTX or TTVX reporting marks were utilized by the Baltimore & Ohio, Burlington Northern, Denver Rio Grande Western, Florida East Coast, Louisville & Nashville, Merchants Dispatch Transportation (leased to Penn Central), Milwaukee Road, Missouri Pacific, Rock Island, Seaboard Coast Line, and St. Louis San Francisco Railway (Frisco) railroads.

Phased out after Vega production ended in 1977, most of the flatcars were reracked with conventional tri-level racks and the Vert-A-Pac bodies were scrapped.




Xmtrman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 71
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +5
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2016, 07:31:07 PM »
+1
The rail cars were an interesting innovation.

The cars that were carried were unbelievably bad (ask a man who owned one in 1971).

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3550
  • Respect: +1917
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2016, 08:44:44 PM »
+1
The rail cars were an interesting innovation.

The cars that were carried were unbelievably bad (ask a man who owned one in 1971).

(Attachment Link)

Except for the '75 - '76 Cosworth Vega which is what the Vega should have been from the start. 


Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3366
  • Respect: +588
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2016, 12:42:26 AM »
+2
Developed by SP, and yet Exactrail didn't do that scheme.   :facepalm:

jmarley76

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Respect: +137
    • WNCRails
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2016, 09:46:17 AM »
0

ridinshotgun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 552
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +136

Hamaker

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 212
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +18
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2016, 01:58:10 PM »
+1
Except for the '75 - '76 Cosworth Vega which is what the Vega should have been from the start. 


Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore

I had the opportunity to drive one of these.  Wish they had developed it more and gone after the Ford Cortinas that were being raced.  Would have been fun !!
I started with nothing and still have most of it left.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35250
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6637
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2016, 03:08:14 PM »
+1
https://exactrail.com/products/x-vert-a-pac-autorack-sp
That was HO scale.

Yes, this forum is very N-scale-centric (which is perfectly fine with me).  And besides,  this is the N and Z section of it.  8)
. . . 42 . . .

OldEastRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3780
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +508
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2016, 05:41:02 PM »
0
"ExactRail always liked HO best!"

Xmtrman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 71
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +5
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2016, 08:33:06 AM »
0
Except for the '75 - '76 Cosworth Vega which is what the Vega should have been from the start. 


Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore

Just like the 1988 Fiero, they got it right too late to save the idea.

For a few hundred more, I woulda' bought a Corvette.

Bob Craig
Cincinnati, OH

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3366
  • Respect: +588
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2016, 07:27:39 PM »
0

jmarley76

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Respect: +137
    • WNCRails
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #12 on: August 28, 2016, 09:58:27 PM »
0
That was HO scale.

No where did he say what scale...  :trollface:

Developed by SP, and yet Exactrail didn't do that scheme.   :facepalm:

I know, I know, it was in the N section, yadda, yadda, yadda...

Look! Is that a Athearn Tri-level autorack over there? *nefarious redirect*

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3827
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2016, 10:22:31 PM »
0
No where did he say what scale...  :trollface:

Wait!! There's other scales?  :D :D

jmarley76

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Respect: +137
    • WNCRails
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal: Vert-A-Pac Auto Carrier
« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2016, 10:51:15 PM »
+1
Wait!! There's other scales?  :D :D

Shhh! Don't say that so loud! Someone said On30 last month and now they're jumping ship left and right...  :D