Author Topic: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0  (Read 67970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12203
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11599
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #465 on: January 18, 2023, 01:14:43 PM »
+11
Been very busy the last few months, but the Midland still lives.





« Last Edit: January 18, 2023, 01:17:20 PM by Dave V »

dcarrell8

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 288
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +209
    • Otter Creek & Rio Grande
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #466 on: February 14, 2023, 07:13:20 PM »
+2
Long live the Midland!

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12203
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11599
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #467 on: August 13, 2025, 02:11:33 PM »
+1
I think it's time to sell this layout. The whole thing, including custom Midland rolling stock.

Pickup only (for now).

Any serious inquires, PM me please.

OldEastRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3769
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +508
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #468 on: August 13, 2025, 06:36:34 PM »
0
What size is it? Length, width, height, approximate weight, type of supports?

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 19517
  • Respect: +6805
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #469 on: August 13, 2025, 06:52:14 PM »
+2
Yeah do you think you could post a few pics? Maybe some early shots? I mean how do I know what I'm getting?

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12203
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11599
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #470 on: August 13, 2025, 07:05:04 PM »
+1
Yeah do you think you could post a few pics? Maybe some early shots? I mean how do I know what I'm getting?

LOL, like this whole thread didn't have any pictures at all?

What size is it? Length, width, height, approximate weight, type of supports?

3 feet by 5 feet 10 inches, height is nominal because the legs telescope in, and it weighs less than a real mountain but more than a deck of cards. Seriously, I suck at estimating weight. It's relatively heavy for its size though.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35225
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6622
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Colorado Midland in N scale 2.0
« Reply #471 on: August 13, 2025, 07:14:34 PM »
+2
It's relatively heavy for its size though.

Sounds like you're describing me.  :D
. . . 42 . . .