0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Let me offer my 2 Cents Worth: The Heavy Mountain 4-8-2
Re: The Bachmann 4-8-2 Heavy Mountain. I hear "ya too." A pertinent question may be: why did Bachmann dis-continue this locomotive ? It has most of the winning elements: metal boiler & traction tires for maximum drawbar pull; all-wheel tender electrical pick-up; silky-smooth running characteristics. One quibble: the insulation on the wires between loco and tender, have a tendency to peel-off, creating conditions for electrical shorts. But other than that, Bachmann had a real winner with this locomotive. Do not even compare the Bachmann Heavy Mountain with the 1st version of the Bachmann Light Mountain. And heaven forbid, do not compare the Bachmann Heavy Mountain with the Bachmann light 2-10-2 locomotive. Once again "Bachmann: why did you discontinue this locomotive ? Just my two cents; and others may disagree.
Nah. Compared with modern releases they really show the age of their tooling. Kato would have to redo EVERYTHING on them to fix the issues, from the squinty number boards to the too low ride height. I have a handful and while I contemplate more SD40 projects I'll just wait for the inevitable one from Atlas that will at least have the things that are HARD to fix right.
MRC version of the model power 2-6-0 and 4-4-0
How about the KATO Mikado? And of course, the details parts...
First gen diesels in green Southern Railway livery. I don't think we've ever had a gp7 in green and it's been 20+ since an RS3. Heck I think it's been 10 years since we've had any green F/E units. Also I know it's an ugly duckling but if buy a DL109 with sound and DCC.