Author Topic: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55  (Read 820 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jon612

  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: +6
Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« on: December 02, 2025, 09:32:17 AM »
0
Does anyone know how well Atlas rail mates up with Micro Engineering track? I might be purchasing a Fast Tracks jig with the ME rail for making turnouts. I have about 20 pieces of Atlas flex on hand but I am trying to decide if purchasing some ME flex would be the path of least resistance in the long term.

Jon

Sumner

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 857
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2420
    • My Home Pages....
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2025, 09:58:21 AM »
0
Does anyone know how well Atlas rail mates up with Micro Engineering track? I might be purchasing a Fast Tracks jig with the ME rail for making turnouts. I have about 20 pieces of Atlas flex on hand but I am trying to decide if purchasing some ME flex would be the path of least resistance in the long term.

Jon

I don't have any Atlas track so can't answer the 'mates up' question though I'd think that wouldn't be hard even if you had to make an adapter section of track if that is needed.  I've done that to use between ME 55 and ME 70.

I will say I love ME code 55, looks wise and how easy it is to lay.  Also with the low spike height it has most of my old locos with pizza cutter wheels don't hit the spikes.  I read comments saying it isn't easy to shape into curves but haven't found that to be true at all if you make a simple tool or print one similar to what use to be available.


The video above shows how easy it is to shape or un-shape with the tool.  More info on my site here...

https://1fatgmc.com/RailRoad/Trackwork/page-23.html

... on the tool and print file links if you have a printer and a build link if you don't.

https://1fatgmc.com/RailRoad/Trackwork/20-11-17%20Track%20Tools-1.jpg

I also have other track laying tools as show above that you can print.  You can find numerous options down the menu a ways here...

https://1fatgmc.com/RailRoad/Trackwork/Trackwork-Index.html

Sumner
« Last Edit: December 02, 2025, 10:00:19 AM by Sumner »
Working in N Scale ---Modeling UP from late 40's to early 70's very loosely......

Under$8.00 Servo turnout Control --- 3D Printed Model RR Objects -- My Home Page

http://1fatgmc.com/RailRoad/RR Main/Link Page Menu.html

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16551
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +7433
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2025, 10:04:57 AM »
0
Should be fine.  There might be a minor difference in the bottom flange, but the rail heads will line up.  If needed, a touch up with a file and some solder will make it as smooth as your hands, eyes, and patience will allow.  As usual, solder your joints before bending the flex track, and all will be right with the world.

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11407
  • Respect: +2868
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2025, 10:18:06 AM »
+2
No problem. Really, no problem. I use ME flex exclusively and Atlas #7 and #10 turnouts. 60-something of those. No special treatment at joints. I do use ME joiners, which are tighter than Atlas.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

spr1955

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 167
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +318
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2025, 10:20:20 AM »
+1
I used both of them on my last railroad when Atlas 55 was in short supply, with no issues.  I also used fast track jigs for #5's without any problems. HTH.
Dave P

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2025, 10:25:11 AM »
0
Given the change in Atlas Cd 55 apperance, I now only use it where it will be covered.  So on the Milwaukee Depot modules, anything under a platform or road is getting Atlas and ME where exposed and balasted. 

No issues going back and forth, and I like to use Atlas Z scale railjoiners.  They're shorter, hold great, and minimize how many ties get removed. 

Dupesy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 542
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +36
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2025, 10:55:27 AM »
0
Given the change in Atlas Cd 55 apperance, I now only use it where it will be covered.  So on the Milwaukee Depot modules, anything under a platform or road is getting Atlas and ME where exposed and balasted. 

No issues going back and forth, and I like to use Atlas Z scale railjoiners.  They're shorter, hold great, and minimize how many ties get removed.

so I'm not losing my mind, there were changes to the Atlas stuff!  I thought something looked off.
dumb ways to die, so many dumb ways to die

peaks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: +9
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2025, 11:00:57 AM »
+1
They work great together. I have ME flextrack and Atlas turnouts.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2025, 11:17:55 AM by peaks »

Sumner

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 857
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2420
    • My Home Pages....
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2025, 11:03:16 AM »
+1
As usual, solder your joints before bending the flex track, and all will be right with the world.
Lee



I'll often pre-bend the new track being laid before soldering.  Especially in places where I wouldn't be able to do the bend after soldering since the track would hit something.  As shown above I'll leave some of the last track laid straight and some of the pre-bent track straight before soldering the connection.  Then bend that part after soldering the straight sections together.



Above I did the same with the next track over using the tools shown.

Sumner
Working in N Scale ---Modeling UP from late 40's to early 70's very loosely......

Under$8.00 Servo turnout Control --- 3D Printed Model RR Objects -- My Home Page

http://1fatgmc.com/RailRoad/RR Main/Link Page Menu.html

jon612

  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: +6
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2025, 11:40:47 AM »
0
Thanks for all the replies!

I like the ME track but finding some in stock is another thing. I just want to focus on making turnouts for the time being and its good to know that the Atlas track will work should I need to use it.



pedro

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 578
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +393
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #10 on: December 02, 2025, 12:00:56 PM »
+1
Thanks for all the replies!

I like the ME track but finding some in stock is another thing. I just want to focus on making turnouts for the time being and its good to know that the Atlas track will work should I need to use it.




The stock situation with ME is being remedied very soon, according to them. They were at Trainfest in November with newly-restocked rail, and said that flex track should be ready by Amherst.

chuck geiger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3559
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Talk Media
  • Respect: +3952
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2025, 01:14:03 PM »
0
Been doing that tandem on 2 small 2x4 layouts, one shelf and now the bigger layout and never an issue.

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2025, 03:25:41 PM »
+1
so I'm not losing my mind, there were changes to the Atlas stuff!  I thought something looked off.

Yep, new tooling, coarser spike detail. 

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2738
  • Respect: +2388
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2025, 03:33:53 PM »
0
I used Atlas C55 on some temporary bridge spans and it mated to ME C55 just fine. FYI I used Atlas Z scale rail joiners. They fit C55 perfectly. Are nice and tight, and are half the length of ME C55 rail joiners.

Craig

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3544
  • Respect: +1905
Re: Atlas code 55 with Micro Engineering code 55
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2025, 08:22:31 PM »
+3
If you can find ME Code55 flex, then I would definitely go with that other than your present Atlas55 cache. 

When Micro Engineering was Rail-Craft and early into the transition to become Micro Engineering, their N-scale flex was by far the best looking N-scale track ever produced.  Then, the injection tool started wearing out and you'd have to remove considerable flash from the flex before using it.  Sometime after becoming Micro Engineering (ME), they produced new injection tools with much bigger spikehead details, almost looking like Atlas55.  However, pizza cutters ran on the new ME flex without any problems (as long as it was Code55 or larger).

But, Atlas55's blobs that are supposed to represent spikeheads, look pretty bad when observed in close-up photography or with Optivisors.  ME flex appears to be much more finely detailed, even though the spikeheads are considerably larger than the old, original Rail-Craft flex, and you don't have to worry about pizza-cutters not running on it...ever.

So, my advice is to see if you can find ME Code55 flex to replace your Atlas55.  If you can, then I'd sell your old, smaller spikeheaded Atlas55 flex for a premium on eBay, emphasizing that it's the older, finer detailed trackage.

I prefer ME flex with the unweathered rails since I'm going to paint it anyway.  The original weathered ME rail had problems with soldering and bare shiny spots where the spikeheads gripped the railfoot, but I understand those problems have been fixed. 

For your turnout-making and rail-joining, I highly recommend purchasing and using the very best flux/solder combination there is for model railroad trackage...and that is Superior No.30 Supersafe Liquid Soldering Flux and 96/4 Tin/Silver Silver-bearing solder.  This flux is self-neutralizing so it won't ever cause corrosion problems, and makes every rail joint successful.  The 96/4 Tin/Silver solder melts just a few degrees hotter than "normal" Tin/Lead or lead-free electrical solders and can be easily worked with a simple 35W iron.  Also, this Silver-bearing solder is 5 to 6 times stronger than normal electrical solders, so...it's perfect for making turnouts, joining flextrack and making stronger feeder wire joints that are MUCH more difficult to pull off the rails.  Both this flux and the Silver-bearing solder are available here: https://www.hnflux.com/

As a good practice to aid in successful rail solder joints, I burnish the copper cladding on my PCB ties removing the oxidation, with a pencil eraser.  Quick and easy.  I also burnish the bottom of the rail by pulling the rail over an old Peco Brite-Boy style track cleaning pad.  Then, I wet a paper towel with Bestine (Heptane) rubber cement thinner, and clean my ties and rails with it to de-grease them.  Brake cleaner works well also, but I prefer Bestine, which you can get at most art supply stores like Michaels.

I also prepare my coreless Silver-bearing solder by squashing about 1/2" of it flat using my flat-nose pliers, then I slit the flattened end down the middle with a sharp X-acto knife which forms two fine "whiskers" of solder which I can easily and accurately apply to the juncture of the railfoot and the PCB tie's copper cladding...heating both the rail and cladding with a small, clean and tinned wedge iron tip, placed so it rests on both the PCB copper cladding and the edge of the railfoot.  I apply my solder on the opposite side of the rail, and when it melts, the molten solder is drawn towards the iron.  I wipe any excess solder onto the top of the PCB tie with the hot tip of my iron.

Photo (1) - A close-up of a turnout made using these techniques, Superior No.30 Supersafe Flux and 96/4 Tin/Silver solder:


As for rail joiners.  Ever notice that when you take a close-up photo of a model train, there always seems to be a big ol' rail joiner right in the middle of the photo along with uneven, spikeless ties under it?? For me, it screams "MODEL!" and I want it to be difficult to determine if my photos are of the real deal, or what scale they are...so rail joiners were one of the first things I decided to minimize, along with the spikeless ties underneath them.

So, I thought the best place for a rail joiner would be in the space between ties.  That would mean a very short rail joiner, but, using 96/4 Silver-bearing solder, which is at least 5 times stronger than "regular" solder, the shortness shouldn't be a problem...especially using Rail-Craft/ME flex, which stays at whatever radius you bend it to and doesn't try to spring back to straight all the time.

Since I had many packages of ME Code55 rail joiners already, and they're a pretty tight fit, the first thing I did to modify them was to cut off the long "tongue" on either end since I didn't see any reason for it in the first place.

Then, I slid the tongueless rail joiner onto a scrap piece of rail, measured the length of the distance between ties with my cheap, stainless HFT digital calipers, and scored a line on the bottom of the rail joiner which is how long I wanted it to be.

Then, using a sharp pair of flush-cutters, I snipped the rail joiner off, cutting BOTH the scrap piece of rail and the mounted joiner simultaneously. This keeps the rail joiner from crushing.

Flush cutters only cut flush on one side, so I made sure THAT side was on the scored line on the bottom of the mounted rail joiner I wanted to fit between ties.

Then, I slide the cut-off rail joiner back onto its piece of rail...this makes all the little burrs flush-cutting produces go to the outside edge of the end of the rail joiner that I've just cut.  I then slide the cut rail joiner back towards the end of the rail I've just cut, and holding it in place, I hit it with a fine flat file or with a fine sanding wheel in my Foredom Rotary Tool to remove the protruding burrs.

The end of the piece of scrap rail with the rest of the joiner on it, now needs to be dressed, so I do the same sort of cut to remove the mashed side of the flush cut I've just made, and I use the same process described above to get rid of the burrs on the cut rail joiner.

Then, I score another line on the bottom of the mounted rail joiner and slide it inward so that there's about 1/4" or more of rail sticking out of the side I've just "dressed"

Then, I repeat the process, using the scored line as a reference for where my cut should be...not longer, but maybe just a bit shorter...just an RCH shorter.

I can get at least two, and sometimes three, short rail joiners out of one regular ME C55 rail joiner.

It's a PITA to install them unless I make sure the ends of the rails I'm joining have been dressed...no burrs, and with the corners of the cut railfoot tapered just a bit to not catch the rail joiner and ease insertion.

When inserting them onto the flex, I cut both flex stick's rails so the cut is as close to between ties as I can do it.  Then, I cut three or four tie spacers away from between the ties with my X-acto knife and slide the ties back away from the rail ends on both pieces of flex.

Photo (2) - Rails cut so that the ends are in the middle of the space between ties, tie-spacers cut & removed, and ties slid back:


Next, I slide the short rail joiners onto both of one stick's rails...the short rail joiners are usually not as tight as a full joiner would be...then I position the other stick and slide one joiner onto both stick's rails so that the ends of the rails are centered on the inside of the joiner.

Making sure the railheads are straight, I solder the joiner and the rails in place using my liquid, self-neutralizing Superior No.30 flux and my 96/4 Silver-bearing solder.  Because the ties are slid back from the joint, there is little chance of melting them.

Then, I do the same for the other rail.

I double check to make sure the joints are as near perfect as I can make them and that the rails are straight and even with each other.  I correct any problems at this point with my iron, repositioning the rail ends if necessary.

After I'm completely happy with the rail joints, I slide the ties back into place.  If I've cut the rail joiners correctly they should fit into the space between ties and the space between ties on either side of the joints should be the same as the rest of the spaces between ties.

Photo (3) - Short rail joiners soldered in place and ties slid back into place awaiting final positioning:
 

This means, no having to modify ties to go under rail joiners, no missing spikeheads on the rails, and no big, unsightly rail joiners spoiling the scene.

How do they look after painting and weathering?

Photo (4) - Find the rail joiners on Rail-Craft Code55 flex at Echo Yard


Although when the description is read, it seem complicated and time-consuming, it goes quicker after you become familiar with how to do it.  One thing is that you don't have to go over your track and insert "special" ties under the attached rail joiners, thus saving some time in that aspect.

Is it worth the bit of extra time to do it this way?  It is for me, since I work to please myself.  Chances are nobody else will notice other than to say that your trackwork looks really good...but you'll know why.

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore