0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Atlas revolutionized motive mower design in 1983 with the introduction of the RS-3.
It's a combination of etching and packaging the items so that they would remain affordable. You can't find anyone in the States that will de-sprue and package and keep the cost reasonable. That is the issue. Atlas is turnkey, they don't have the ability to take raw etchings and package them into tiny baggies and attach cardboard header cards. They lost that ability in the last century when the ceased manufacturing and assembly line operations in Hillside.
It was Kato that revolutionized N scale motor power with their GP38-2 and it was Kato that produced the Atlas RS-3.
I have to ask if they couldn't follow through with this for their BLMA etching stuff even with their Asian production base what makes you think they will be able to do it with the injection molding that is done for the couplers and trucks? I mean that stuff doesn't just detach itself from the mold sprues and jump into a package.
Just out of curiosity, why do some of you think that moving production away from the USA to Asia is a good thing?I am pretty sure that the prices for Micro-Trains will go up, not down. The tariffs will do the rest.https://hobbycoalition.org/ Javier
Because they do it now with their legacy trucks and the ex-BLMA trucks, and have been for years if not decades.
It could always be worse. Remember those great Rowa passenger cars back in the 80s?And all the Rivarossi tooling?Lee
Ok got it so in other words they shouldn’t have an excuse of why they can’t produce and package etchings.
Atlas contracted Kato to produce the RS-3 to their specifications. Kato then took that knowledge as the basis for their GP38-2 and entered the USA market. The RS-3 was first to market.
Sorry, Kato's DD13 pre-dated the RS-3 by 5 years. Kato offered the GP38-2 to ConCor which balked at the MSRP so Kato opened Kato USA.