0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I’ve talked with a few folks involved in the transition, and the plan from Atlas is to keep Micro-Trains going as its own brand — similar to what they’ve done with Atlas O. Some comparisons get tossed around, but every past situation had its own complications. With BLMA, the big issue wasn’t lack of interest; it was that nobody anywhere could etch those detail parts anymore. With Life-Like, a lot of molds were literally missing or incomplete after factory changes overseas. Those were production problems, not decisions to ‘drop’ anything. A series of former Life-Like motive power has been modernized and is in production again. With Micro-Trains, their goal is different. Atlas is already talking with select MTL employees to see who’s interested in staying on, because they want continuity in the look, feel, and flow of the product line. They didn’t buy Micro-Trains just to park it — that wouldn’t make any sense. The whole idea here is to expand what Atlas can offer, not replace or erase anything.A lot of us would love to see everything stay in the U.S., and that’s understandable. But there are reasons — some obvious, some behind the scenes — why that isn’t possible right now. What is true is that there are people inside both companies who care about Micro-Trains and are working hard to make this transition as smooth as it can be.There will be a few months of ramp-up while things get sorted out, but the combined Atlas team — along with MTL folks who decide to continue — will be doing everything they can to keep product moving and keep the Micro-Trains name alive and well.
The US market is like collapsing right now, both in terms of demand and supply.
Atlas is considered extremely unreliable when it comes to delivery promises and deadlines.