0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
For your reference, here are a few closeup shots of 674. I had to install a plate of styrene under the smokebox which the ladders rest on, it has held up pretty well. The z scale coupler fit in the coupler box with minimal effort.
Nice mods, but I wonder why you installed a functional MTL Z-scale coupler up front but left that giant Bachmann "boxing glove" coupler on the tender?
Short answer is I didnt get to it yet, still on the to-do list. Being in the back it doesnt show in most pictures, so wasnt a priority.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/AqRaQqtfXXpNvByv5
Plus coupler performance is more important in the rear than the front.
Performance? Really? You are implying that the Bachman "boxing glove" version of N scale knuckle coupler offers improved performance over MTL (or other knuckle couplers)? Interesting . . .
No, but probably over a 905, especially if it's running around modular layouts. The little bit of extra gathering face helps.
No that's the 4-6-0. There's a solution to that though too: https://conrail1285.com/fitting-a-minitrix-old-timer-tender-to-a-bachmann-4-6-0/
Although the opening for the driveshaft would have to be filled in, how does your solution of fitting a Minitrix old time tender shell to a Bachmann slope back tender frame compare to using one of the Atlas 4-4-0 tenders?
That Atlas tender would likely end up costing hundreds to get my hands on.
Umm, you mean one of these?