Author Topic: Rapido Autoflood III Sample  (Read 818 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

High Hood

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 487
  • Respect: +127
Rapido Autoflood III Sample
« on: July 27, 2022, 03:25:07 AM »
0
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Rapido Autoflood III Sample
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2022, 03:21:49 PM »
+1
Body mounted couplers maybe. Still, can't see a huge improvement over FVM - especially for the price.
Buffering...

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: Rapido Autoflood III Sample
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2022, 03:36:38 PM »
0
I don't know the difference but FVM was a II, this is III

samusi01

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 439
  • Respect: +443
Re: Rapido Autoflood III Sample
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2022, 03:54:17 PM »
0
Depends on your era and locale, I suppose. Passed a BNSF train last week sitting east of Laurel (Montana) waiting to head into the yard. It was mostly III or later with a few (5% of the cars, perhaps less) being II or earlier.

High Hood

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 487
  • Respect: +127
Re: Rapido Autoflood III Sample
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2022, 03:58:44 PM »
0
Body mounted couplers maybe. Still, can't see a huge improvement over FVM - especially for the price.

They are different prototypes. FVM is the Trinity RD4, while the AutoFlood series was built by Freightcar America, and Johnstown America in earlier years. They are substantially different in regard to end slopes, ribs, and panels.

Both HO and N scales really need the Trinity RD2 and RD6. The Thrall Avalanche would also be a welcome addition as well!
« Last Edit: July 29, 2022, 04:08:42 PM by High Hood »

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Rapido Autoflood III Sample
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2022, 05:06:29 PM »
0
😉😆
Buffering...