Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 54853 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6637
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1569
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #90 on: November 18, 2020, 06:50:19 PM »
0
I'm simply stunned at how fast you were able to get this through permitting.
Here in Washington, it'd take 6-12 mos. at minimum.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #91 on: November 18, 2020, 06:52:14 PM »
0
Why is there a "double wall" on the lower right of the pictures?  Just curious.

That was an existing retaining wall that held back the flower beds as the driveway sloped down that we decided to leave in place.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #92 on: November 18, 2020, 11:28:38 PM »
0
I'm simply stunned at how fast you were able to get this through permitting.
Here in Washington, it'd take 6-12 mos. at minimum.

If the original mason didn't stiff me on doing the job, we'd be under roof in 6 months :D

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 15767
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +5521
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #93 on: November 19, 2020, 07:10:48 AM »
0
So what was the final resolution on the deck expansion?  We're you able to do the new footings for the cantilever beam?  Or will the magically appear after the inspector goes home?😁
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6785
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #94 on: November 19, 2020, 08:32:55 AM »
0
I'm simply stunned at how fast you were able to get this through permitting.
Here in Washington, it'd take 6-12 mos. at minimum.

So close today to finishing the block work.  About 40 10" block short  :(



I'm simply stunned by how your mason can't count.  Isn't this at least the second time that they've come up short?

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #95 on: November 19, 2020, 09:17:54 AM »
0
He figured wrong due to the area around staircase.  Needs more 10" block, but had extra 6" block.  Is what it is.  Little more difficult due to the slope and having stepped footers.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #96 on: November 19, 2020, 09:38:06 AM »
0
So what was the final resolution on the deck expansion?  We're you able to do the new footings for the cantilever beam?  Or will the magically appear after the inspector goes home?😁

I was thinking of that the other day, I think we are actually good on what we're doing.   Have to go back and reread it.  If it wasn't kosher, they wouldn't have approved it, right?  :?

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 15767
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +5521
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #97 on: November 19, 2020, 09:45:27 AM »
0
You're a model railroader...  When you put the new footers in, just weather the hell out of them to make them look like they've been there for ages!
Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

MK

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3973
  • Respect: +720
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #98 on: November 19, 2020, 02:45:40 PM »
0
Ring, ring, ring...

"Hello TruColor?  You sell MRR paint by the gallon?"   :trollface:

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #99 on: November 19, 2020, 05:51:54 PM »
0
So what was the final resolution on the deck expansion?  We're you able to do the new footings for the cantilever beam?  Or will the magically appear after the inspector goes home?😁

Per the plan review " Joists on the plan are depicted as 8' with a cantilever of 2'5".  The cantilever is in excess of the allowed UNSUPPORTED cantilever for the 5'8" span of the joist.  The illustrated angle supports at each post WILL ALLOW the illustrated cantilever."  So that tells me that because we have the angle supports in, we are good to go.  Just pointing out that if we didn't have them, it would not have been approved.  Agree ??

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1441
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +506
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #100 on: November 19, 2020, 06:10:09 PM »
0
That’s exactly how I would interpret that!
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 15767
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +5521
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #101 on: November 20, 2020, 12:48:48 PM »
0
Wait... wasn't there supposed to be a window above the stairway?






Natural light in a stairwell ... It's a good thing.
Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #102 on: November 20, 2020, 06:54:14 PM »
0
Yeah, it was there and I don't know if it was just missed or I said something about it being that it's somewhat behind the retaining wall/not required ?  Can't remember at this point with all the discussions and the length of time for us to actually get to this point.  :?  Important part is all the rebar and cores are in the correct places with correct sizes so nothing moves :D  Walls get tarred this weekend, and will call for inspection early next week.  Then 5 tri-axle loads of fresh stone for backfill will show up as well.  I hope I have enough driveway to store that much :scared:

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 15767
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +5521
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #103 on: November 20, 2020, 07:14:00 PM »
+1
Well, there's one window you won't have to pay for anyway.

So.  Anyone have any bodies they need to dispose of?  Now's your chance!

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3160
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #104 on: November 20, 2020, 07:27:49 PM »
0
There is that big window above it too :D  Not exactly in the stairwell, but  :facepalm:

If anyone does have a, um, you know, what Lee mentioned.  There will be a nominal fee, non-refundable, paid in cash, unmarked bills.  And I know nothing about it....