Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 54373 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GM50 4164

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 195
  • Respect: +85
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #240 on: November 07, 2021, 01:00:35 PM »
0
In that case, you can't have my roundhouse! :trollface:
LOL


Benjamin H

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #241 on: November 18, 2021, 02:35:20 PM »
+3
Today was final inspection day on the addition and it passed.  I'm just waiting for zoning officer to stop by with the occupancy permit and it's official

Once that arrives, it's game on for CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 ! 

Stay tuned  :D

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6785
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #242 on: November 18, 2021, 02:43:46 PM »
0
Today was final inspection day on the addition and it passed.  I'm just waiting for zoning officer to stop by with the occupancy permit and it's official

Once that arrives, it's game on for CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 ! 

Stay tuned  :D

Woo hoo!  Congratulations!

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +652
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #243 on: November 18, 2021, 05:53:27 PM »
0
Today was final inspection day on the addition and it passed.  I'm just waiting for zoning officer to stop by with the occupancy permit and it's official

Once that arrives, it's game on for CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 ! 

Stay tuned  :D

No need to let a little thing like a permit stop you from laying tracks.
Peter Pfotenhauer

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #244 on: November 18, 2021, 06:09:23 PM »
0
No but my permit was up this weekend, so it was full bore on addition work.  Now that that's taken care of, things can shift focus to the layout

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1426
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1296
    • The Little Rock Line
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #245 on: November 18, 2021, 07:44:33 PM »
0
I too echo DFF's comment!  That's great news Adam!

Bob

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 429
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +545
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #246 on: November 20, 2021, 08:47:37 PM »
0
Congratulations on completing the addition!  Really looking forward to seeing your progress!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #247 on: December 02, 2021, 03:29:03 PM »
+2
Occ permit in hand, and project officially complete !  Now full attention can be put towards the basement and the layout !

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6785
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #248 on: December 02, 2021, 06:57:20 PM »
+1
Woo hoo!  Fire it up!

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #249 on: December 05, 2021, 05:48:13 PM »
+4
Before any layout construction can start, have to work on ceiling first.  Before ceiling can go in, need to close in the ductwork.  Got a good start on it today before work.



Using material I had sitting around, it's constructed from 2x3.  We could probably use it as an engine hoist.  At one point, we were both hanging off of it, probably a combined 400+ lbs :D

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #250 on: December 10, 2021, 08:43:39 PM »
0
I finished up building bulkhead around the hvac ductwork this evening.  Some drywall and we're ready for drop ceiling.



While my friend was here helping last weekend, he looks at me and says " You're going to hate me.......... You're going to hate me.......... What if you take the wall out that the TV is hanging on, rebuild the wall coming across, move your hot water heater to beside the furnace, and then enclose everything into a mechanical room ? "

Please excuse the mess !  Still a disaster area....



The HWH is just out of view to the right on back wall of house, to the left of that is pressure tank and water softener.  If we were to do all this, the wall you see with TV would basically pivot 90* to close off the opening to it's left, move HWH to beside furnace and enclose it all.  Workbench is going to be moving to the garage and I'll have a smaller desk to work from for working on models.  This is all still very fluid and nothing decided yes or no.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2021, 08:46:30 PM by mu26aeh »

Specter3

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 856
  • Respect: +149
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #251 on: December 10, 2021, 10:01:50 PM »
0
This is the stage to do it. And now that the possibility has been seen, if you don’t, you will probably regret it. My wife will tell you all the scope creep stories of my old and new house, but in the end each change made it a significantly better project and we were always happy with the results.

LKOrailroad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 333
  • Respect: +178
    • LK&O Railroad
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #252 on: December 11, 2021, 11:21:36 AM »
0
Our home when built was deliberately designed with all the mechanicals in a separate room. At the time not specifically because of trains but because it made the rest of the basement wide open clear space so we could do anything we wanted with it. We even went a little extreme by positioning the mechanicals room at the far end of a long rectangular shaped basement.

After living here for almost 20 years I can honestly say it was a great decision. No odd restrictions to work around building my layout and an overall increased utility of the entire basement for "basementy" stuff.

Alan

When I was a kid... no wait, I still do that. HO, 28x32, double deck, 1969, RailPro

http://www.lkorailroad.com

jon612

  • Posts: 18
  • Respect: +5
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #253 on: December 11, 2021, 01:06:00 PM »
0
You can save space and eliminate the hot water heater. If the water is already hot, you don't need to heat it.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3108
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #254 on: December 19, 2021, 10:53:55 AM »
+3
Slowly getting there...