0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thats EXACTLY what N-scale needs!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Another SD40-2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not sure I understand the point of the SD70 comparison, Ed. (How many proto versions or N scale versions?)Nobody would be suggesting that Scale Trains should do another SD40-2 if IM and BLI had hit it out of the park. Hate to say it, but IM just seems to lack the expertise to produce an Atlas or Kato quality model in terms of both shell and mech. (One big problem is they keep relying on the worst ever N scale six-axle truck design, by Atlas. Dead horse, I know.) Lots of great ambition and features that look great on paper. Actually, to be fair, if they had just tooled a new truck then their entry would be so much better. As for BLI, well, let's just not go there...
Given how many of them were (and still ARE) out there, it's not as crazy as it seems. I mean, how many SD70 versions do we have?
Hell, Northern Pacific has more plastic ready to run prototypical steam with the Z8 challenger than the damned santa fe! ya know, that one railroad that every mfg slapped on the side of models to get them to sell back in the day!!
santa fe! ya know, that one railroad that every mfg slapped on the side of models to get them to sell back in the day!! lol
What is the prototype for this model of steam loco that has Santa Fe "slapped on the side" of it?
I really hope you're not serious...........
I guess if we're using that logic, bachmann didn't need to bring out the K4 since minitrix did 40 years ago right?
If you don't buy it, the manufacturer will just assume that there is no market demand for Santa Fe steam loco models.
Given that the model has been in production for 40 years with various updates, it seems safe to assume they have figured out that there is a market even for a second rate Santa Fe steam loco. Imagine the market for a 1st rate version.
In my humble opinion, the ATSF 3776/2900 class Northern is a victim of its prototype's early day fame, and Bachmann. It was a magnificent locomotive and was (logically) one of the first US steam locomotives produced in N scale. Unfortunately, the model was a POS, aesthetically, mechanically, electrically. I know, I bought some, forty plus years ago. Bachmann "upgraded" this model at least four times, but it is still godawful, particularly the shell. Similar fate befell the Santa Fe caboose (way car). It was an early model, done poorly by several manufacturers, but because it's "been done already" it's never been done right since. Intermountain announced them many years ago, but produced only the modernized version, not the classic one.
That is an interesting take on those models. Can someone explain to me why model manufacturers keep on duplicating their efforts and producing multiple versions of several locos and rolling stock (F-units, and such), and yet there was only a single model of the ATSF Northern, and few poorly rendered models of ATSF caboose produced? After all, Santa Fe and UP are also probably the two most popular roadnames in N scale.
THIS!!!! I can't understand how the model railroad manufacturers don't realise that tooling a quality ATSF 37XX or 29XX Northern would be instant pay dirt. I model Tehachapi in 1999, and I'd still shell out serious dollars for a quality ATSF 3751 with sound (I have a Key Brass model in need of serious upgrades), and it would be hard to resist 2926 as well.Kato have clearly done well with 4449 and 844. Athearn have done well with 3985 and now 4014. Both manufacturers have made the early series locos as well. This is a no brainer.But instead we get another tooling of the NW2. Meh.