« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Undoing Hunter?  (Read 1985 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Blazeman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • Respect: +65
Undoing Hunter?
« on: July 06, 2018, 02:01:43 PM »
0
Logged

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11111
  • Respect: +2627
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2018, 02:06:29 PM »
0
Quote
... we will improve network fluidity, optimize train starts, and dramatically reduce out-of-route train miles ...

I just love specious corporate-speak. :x
Logged
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

jpec

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 858
  • Gender: Male
  • Perception and reality engage in a daily civil war
  • Respect: +175
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2018, 11:55:16 PM »
+1
Quote from: C855B on July 06, 2018, 02:06:29 PM
I just love specious corporate-speak. :x

When they start tossing around double talk like that in meetings at work I ask if they can repeat that in a language I understand. Must be why I don't get invited to many meetings any more.
Logged
"trees are non-judgmental, and they won't abuse or betray you."- DKS

Blazeman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • Respect: +65
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2018, 10:12:40 AM »
0
From a Wall Street service:

We spoke with CSX, and the change back to a switching yard will increase capacity from 1,000 to 1,500 cars per day. More importantly, this will reduce traffic through other yards such as Waycross, GA and Cincinnati. As a result, CSX estimates this change can eliminate about 30M unnecessary car miles per year. CSX also expects this will help reduce some capital costs at other yards and the start-up costs to switch back to a hump yard should be minimal. So this seems like the continued evolution and implementation of precision railroading.

Fleshes out the corporate-speak.
Logged

Maletrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3708
  • Respect: +690
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2018, 10:36:50 AM »
0
Quote
... So this seems like the continued evolution and implementation of precision railroading.

Fleshes out the corporate-speak.

Wouldn't translating the corporate speak result in "We found out that our previous changes were a bad idea and are changing back"?
Logged

Lenny53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2218
  • Respect: +1838
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2018, 04:47:01 PM »
0
Quote from: Maletrain on July 10, 2018, 10:36:50 AM
Wouldn't translating the corporate speak result in "We found out that our previous changes were a bad idea and are changing back"?
You never want to say that to the shareholders.
Logged

Point353

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3460
  • Respect: +830
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2018, 08:21:51 PM »
0
Quote from: Lenny53 on July 10, 2018, 04:47:01 PM
You never want to say that to the shareholders.
Unless you can follow it up with the statement that the driving force behind those changes is no longer employed by the corporation.
Logged

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13582
  • Respect: +3519
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2018, 08:52:05 PM »
0
Logged

ljudice

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3370
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +245
    • NS/CR Camp Car Models
Re: Undoing Hunter?
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2018, 11:36:14 PM »
0
A bolder move would be to announce they INVENTED hump yards thanks to AI-based IOT Data Mining.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »