Author Topic: Wathers SW1200.  (Read 7274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gozer the Gozerian

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1798
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1102
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #30 on: August 17, 2017, 05:31:56 PM »
0
I'm not sure who blinked first...I think we had an MOQ and pre sold plenty extra to warrant an order to the Walthers's Factory...since we were ordering they may have taken the opportunity to release theirs.  I don't know what communications there were or what conspiracy theory we can start here on Railwire...  :)

Joe


YUP...I wonder if they will use our modifications...

Joe


Joe, does what you stated imply that there were no behind-the-scenes contact between Walthers and MTL to  produce another batch of the mechanisms?  They simply decided to revive this model on their own?  If that is the case, you better get in touch with them and ask to produce lots of extra mechanisms for MTL.  :D
Gozer the Traveler. He will come in one of the pre-chosen forms. During the rectification of the Vuldrini, the traveler came as a large and moving Torg! Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the McKetrick supplicants, they chose a new form for him: that of a giant Slor!

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3428
  • Respect: +345
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #31 on: August 17, 2017, 05:34:25 PM »
0
Love the ATSF Zebras!

But, if see aren't DCC ready, I'm out; I already have so many old technology locos on my bench, and don't *need* another project. (I do wish ATLAS would do their S2's in the ATSF "zebra scheme", even the simplified one.)
Otto K.

I have been wanting Atlas to do the atsf zebra scheme in the S2 also. I will buy SW1200 anyway and then if Atlas does bring it out I will just have both, oh darn!
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8804
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1530
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #32 on: August 18, 2017, 08:20:31 AM »
0
I don't know what communications there were or what conspiracy theory we can start here on Railwire...  :)

Joe

 :trollface:That Walthers finally gets N Scale of course! :trollface:
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.

"Yes there are somethings that are "off;" but hey, so what." ~ Wyatt

"I'm trying to have less cranial rectal inversion with this." - Ed K.

"There's more to MRR life than the Wheezy & Nowheresville." C855B

milw12

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 372
  • Respect: +319
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #33 on: August 18, 2017, 09:47:20 AM »
0

When you devise a good way to change the fuel tanks and add the coiled pipe, let me know.  ;)



Well that image just made Walthers a sale  :scared:

learmoia

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4030
  • Gender: Male
  • ......
  • Respect: +908
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #34 on: August 18, 2017, 10:56:54 AM »
0
This excites me. I'm impressed that Walthers is correctly releasing the only two numbers IHB had. And I love the EJE units.  I will be picking up all four. I will also pick up a few other iHB's to renumber to represent SW900's.  I have about 6 older LL's that I can now retire as I've never converted them to DCC anyway.

With a bit of wire and kapton tape, you should be able to put DCC in the older LL units too.
~Ian

sirenwerks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5804
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +351
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #35 on: August 18, 2017, 12:13:03 PM »
0

When you devise a good way to change the fuel tanks and add the coiled pipe, let me know.  ;)


+1
Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8797
  • Respect: +1128
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #36 on: August 18, 2017, 12:51:09 PM »
0
The tanks already went to production.

Need to figure out what size pipes those are.  2"?

Jason

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6635
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1569
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #37 on: August 18, 2017, 01:51:27 PM »
0
The tanks already went to production.

Need to figure out what size pipes those are.  2"?

Jason

I would estimate that if the handrails are 1", then the pipes would be 1-1/2".
It's interesting that there wasn't really a standard across all class for the number of coils.  I see just about as many with 4 coils in my collection as I do that have 5.

Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8797
  • Respect: +1128
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #38 on: August 18, 2017, 03:03:41 PM »
+3
I would estimate that if the handrails are 1", then the pipes would be 1-1/2".
It's interesting that there wasn't really a standard across all class for the number of coils.  I see just about as many with 4 coils in my collection as I do that have 5.



I bent some .012" SS wire with .010" gaps that looks pretty good for now.  Looks like the fuel filler can be harvested from the LL tank.

When I get this all together, I'll start a thread.


Jason

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9684
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2106
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #39 on: August 18, 2017, 05:51:27 PM »
+1
I want some 50s era UPs please Mr W .


Richie Dost

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +652
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #40 on: August 18, 2017, 11:15:40 PM »
+1
:trollface:That Walthers finally gets N Scale of course! :trollface:

to be a conspiracy theory it has to be slightly believable
Peter Pfotenhauer

Doug G.

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1061
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +22
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #41 on: August 20, 2017, 02:05:58 AM »
0
Wow! At least they're not a hundred bucks. :D

Doug
Atlas First Generation Motive Power and Treble-O-Lectric. Click on the link:
www.irwinsjournal.com/a1g/a1glocos/

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3908
  • Respect: +986
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #42 on: August 20, 2017, 08:06:23 AM »
0
Trying to figure out Walthers marketing strategy.  If this was announced at any of the recent shows, it went right by me.  Even given their attitude towards N scale, it seems weird to keep these a secret when you have opportunities for free marketing.  Or, is this one of those ala Intermountain, where they announced it so long ago that we forgot, and it has just now hit the catalog page?

But apparently they not only told Spookshow, he got hold of a mechanism (or is using photos of a MT unit). http://www.spookshow.net/loco/llsw.html scroll halfway down the page for photo of "2017" mechanism.  Looks like speculation here is correct, it is the same mechanism supplied to MT, and uses a DN126M2.
Tom D.

I have a mind like a steel trap...a VERY rusty, old steel trap.

spookshow

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1763
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1720
    • Model Railroading Projects & Resources
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #43 on: August 20, 2017, 09:59:42 AM »
+4
But apparently they not only told Spookshow, he got hold of a mechanism (or is using photos of a MT unit). http://www.spookshow.net/loco/llsw.html scroll halfway down the page for photo of "2017" mechanism.  Looks like speculation here is correct, it is the same mechanism supplied to MT, and uses a DN126M2.

I don't have any inside information (and yes, that photo is an MT unit). But since the Walthers page says that these new SW1200's are DCC-Ready and will accept a Digitrax DN126M2 decoder (same as the MT SW1500), I didn't think it was a big stretch to assume that these new SW1200 models will use the same MT-style internals. If that turns out to be incorrect (or the models never happen at all, which wouldn't surprise me), I'll amend my page.

-Mark

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10916
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +998
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: Wathers SW1200.
« Reply #44 on: August 23, 2017, 08:14:26 AM »
0
I bent some .012" SS wire with .010" gaps that looks pretty good for now.  Looks like the fuel filler can be harvested from the LL tank.

When I get this all together, I'll start a thread.


Jason

@wcfn100 thanks, I'll be looking for this.