Author Topic: Conrail NW2 9253  (Read 14923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MichaelWinicki

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2093
  • Respect: +328
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #150 on: April 18, 2017, 05:20:40 PM »
0
Egads!!!! The Conrail dude even has Conrail brushes :ashat:.    the blues are everywhere....... blue bands, blue letters  blue everywhere......      sigh----- what did that poor used pennsy NW2 do to deserve this.

great job you are becoming  a new bacon rail guru............... whoops conrail. :facepalm:

Couldn't be Conrail brushes... If they were, half of the bristles would be pulled from each brush after being judged unnecessary and the oldest brushes would be tossed out in the middle of the night so no one else could use them.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24069
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +7958
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #151 on: April 24, 2017, 11:47:32 AM »
+8
Ok, here we go. Done!




MichaelWinicki

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2093
  • Respect: +328
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #152 on: April 24, 2017, 12:12:58 PM »
+1
Well done sir!

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24069
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +7958
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #153 on: April 24, 2017, 12:44:32 PM »
0

Lemosteam

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5745
  • Gender: Male
  • PRR, The Standard Railroad of my World
  • Respect: +3124
    • Designer at Keystone Details
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #154 on: April 24, 2017, 01:04:27 PM »
0
Thank you sir!

Uh, where are the little numberboards???  Hmmmm???   :trollface: :trollface: :trollface:

coosvalley

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1405
  • Respect: +639
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #155 on: April 24, 2017, 01:14:20 PM »
0
I like it!.The one thing that still sticks out to me is the stacks..I think some black chalk maybe?..They look brush painted to me, while the rest of the loco does not. I had a loco with the same issue, and some black chalk helped  cover it up.

I love the tarp.

mmagliaro

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6262
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1779
    • Maxcow Online
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #156 on: April 24, 2017, 06:04:26 PM »
0
Ed, I like it, especially the dusty weathering.

Would you consider putting in some MT N or even Z scale body-mount couplers?   The ones that are in there look kind of big to me.

The paint job came out good.   Nobody would ever know or care that it's brush painted.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 31792
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +4593
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #157 on: April 24, 2017, 07:26:54 PM »
0
Ed, I like it, especially the dusty weathering.

Would you consider putting in some MT N or even Z scale body-mount couplers?   The ones that are in there look kind of big to me.


Is that the original Kato knuckle coupler?
. . . 42 . . .

crrcoal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 498
  • Respect: +48
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #158 on: April 24, 2017, 07:37:51 PM »
0
No louvers??  :P

Looks great Ed!! Nice job! Hmmm, whats that boxcar; an X58? Who makes it?

mmagliaro

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6262
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1779
    • Maxcow Online
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #159 on: April 24, 2017, 08:06:06 PM »
0
Is that the original Kato knuckle coupler?

I thought it was a Bachmann "boxing glove", but that probably isn't right.

Oh, and Ed, the fuel tank is hanging a little lower toward the front.

Okay okay!  LOL!  I'll shut up!   :P    You know it's a good job when people nitpick.   :)

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 31792
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +4593
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #160 on: April 24, 2017, 08:36:19 PM »
0
I thought it was a Bachmann "boxing glove", but that probably isn't right.


I looked at the photos again again and it is the Kato coupler. Those have fairly realistic-looking top detail and the weathering makes it look even better. But is quite large (however, nowhere as large as McHenry or Bachmann boxing-glove).
. . . 42 . . .

Kisatchie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +62
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #161 on: April 24, 2017, 08:48:01 PM »
0
...You know it's a good job when people nitpick.   :)


Hmm... that loco shoulda
been painted for the
Southern Rwy...


Two scientists create a teleportation ray, and they try it out on a cricket. They put the cricket on one of the two teleportation pads in the room, and they turn the ray on.
The cricket jumps across the room onto the other pad.
"It works! It works!"

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24069
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +7958
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #162 on: April 25, 2017, 03:22:51 PM »
+1
Yep, it's the Kato coupler.

Here it is compared with a regular MTL knuckle.



And here it is compared with a 905 (or whatever they are now).


mmagliaro

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6262
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1779
    • Maxcow Online
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #163 on: April 26, 2017, 10:52:37 AM »
0
Okay, now I see, Ed.  What do you think about putting a 905 in there?  I'm only suggesting this because you put a lot of time into repainting and detailing this thing, and the coupler would be a really nice touch.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24069
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +7958
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #164 on: April 26, 2017, 12:28:23 PM »
+1
I've thought about it, but given the work this thing will be doing, I think I'm going to need to make sure to balance appearance and operation. So, I think I might want to give it some time to see if the Kato coupler is fine, or if I should replace it with an MTL, and if so, which one.

I think one thing I can do though is hit it with a darker brown so it's not so contrasty and obvious.