0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
FWIW, that is one one the cars on my short list for True Scale Coupler pockets. But I can't make any promises right now on when I can get to it.Jason
I'm looking for suggestions for body-mounting couplers on Athearn Coalporters. So far, I've tried Z-scale 905 couplers, but they don't seem to want to stay reliably coupled. I've tried Red Caboose Unimate couplers. Not bad... might be what I end up going with. Lastly, I've tried MT "True-Scale" couplers, but the coupler box is too large and either interferes with the truck bolster or the screw interferes with the outer-most axle, depending on how the box is positioned. I'd love an option like the the MT TS coupler with a smaller box, or a Z coupler that remains coupled. Unimates are looking like the most reliable option. What are your experiences / suggestions? Thanks in advance,Chris
True, Unimates are the most economical, and the most reliable. They're also about the ugliest of the options listed. if performance is the main consideration, I'd also go with them, and have them on all of my Kato B units, and the rears of most of the As, where they won't likely be coupling to a train.I have working 905s on a train of Atlas ore cars, and they stay coupled well. On the other hand, they're not the best rollers, having Precision Masters wheels in old Atlas trucks, so there's no slack action, even if the locos hesitate a little. That keeps the couplers together.On my narrow gauge ore train I have MT body mount couplers for Marklin boxes, and those cars roll very nicely. Some of them have had to be "dummied", but the train runs as a unit train, so it doesn't make any difference.