Author Topic: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners  (Read 3756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2990
  • Respect: +1254
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2017, 03:17:06 PM »
+3
I use ME C55 and C40 flex and I've used ME #6 turnouts too, so when I'm looking at this thread with ALL the advice as to how to get rail joiners on, I'm thinking to myself "Did you ever have problems getting ME rail joiners on ME rail???"

The answer to that question is "No". 

First, I didn't ever like the looks of them big 'ol rail joiners ugly-ing up my precision track work, so, I started cutting the rail joiners into much smaller versions that fit between the ties, cutting the plastic between-the-tie-spacers away from at least three ties on either side of the joint then sliding those ties back out of the way of the solder joint.  The ends of the rails get dressed with a file so they aren't rough, and the corners of the rail foot are filed at an angle (roughly a 45 deg. angle)...just a bit of it, not clear to the rail web...and the joiners slide on pretty easily.  I then bring my second piece of flex to the party, using my Dremel and a fine sanding disk to get the rails just the right length, and after dressing the rail ends just like the other piece's, I slide the shortened rail joiners onto the second piece of flex, centering the joint in the middle of the joiner.  I solder it after fluxing with Superior Super Safe #30 gel flux using a tin/silver coreless solder, and a few seconds after it's cooled, slide the ties back into their correct position on either side of the joint. 

I don't want my rail joiners loose and flopping around since they are there for me for a structural purpose, not for conducting electricity because I put a feeder on every piece of rail, and they serve this structural function very well after I solder them.  ME flex, since it's stiff, doesn't need a lot of structural assistance to stay in place anyway, but a bit of reinforcement with my little rail joiners has worked very well on my portable, sectional layout.

Additionally, since I'm not sliding ties UNDER the joiners, all the ties are the same height, and have their cast-on spikehead/tieplate details intact, just like the rest of the ties on the layout, and the joints virtually disappear...especially after painting, ballasting and weathering.

If I were to use full-length rail joiners, I would welcome their tight fit and consider that to be essential.  When working on modules and layouts other than my own, to get ME railjoiners  started on ME rail, I first cut one (1) of the little "tongues" off one end of the joiners so they are a bit shorter using a sharp flush-cutter...I'll cut the other tongue off later... then dress the ends of the cut rails with a fine jeweler's file and completely de-burr them.  I also make sure I file the small angles on the corners of the rail feet on either pieces of flex I'm joining.  This allows me to get the joiners more easily started (the most important part) and easily slid on to the rails.

After puncturing myself once and bleeding all over my unfinished scenery, I LEARNED from this experience and started using one of the corners on my miniature, precision flat-nose pliers to hold the joiner which I've cut ONE little tongue of off on the end where I've left one tongue on, mounting it on the rail with the end where I'd cut the tongue off of.  To be perfectly clear, I hold the joiner with the corner of my precision flat-nose pliers on the end I have NOT CUT THE TONGUE OFF OF, sliding the end with the tongue cut off from onto the rail FIRST. 

After mounting the joiner on the rail and sliding it on, I cut the remaining little tongue off of the mounted joiner, and slide the other piece of flex (the rails of which I've dressed and filed just like the piece I've mounted the two joiners to) on to the two mounted joiners, then using miniature, long-nosed pliers, I position the mounted joiners where I want them on the rail feet.

This is pretty simple, and it takes a lot less time to do this than to write about it. These joiners won't be flopping around on the rails, and they fulfill one of their intended purposes by accurately aligning the rail ends at the joint, and using my precision flat-nose pliers to mount them, my thumbs and fingers remain unwounded.

However, to repeat myself, on my own layout, I don't use full-length rail joiners, but the ones I cut to fit the space between ties. 

I think the full-length ones are overkill, look ugly as sin and necessitate equally ugly, modified ties under them.

Photo (1) - Here's a pic of my cut-down rail joiners mounted to painted, unballasted track:


Edit:  I always forget to tell how I cut the joiners.  I mount them on a scrap piece of rail, and cut BOTH the joiner and rail at the same time.  This prevents the joiner from squashing.  I then slide the cut joiner back on to the rail a bit, which bends any burrs on the joiner to the outside of the cut end where I can easily file them off.  I can get two small joiners out of one full-sized joiner for sure, and sometimes three.

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore
« Last Edit: January 26, 2017, 11:42:30 PM by robert3985 »

Mike Madonna

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 443
  • Respect: +85
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2017, 10:45:38 PM »
0
Bob,
Great info, thanks!
Mike
SOUTHERN PACIFIC Coast Division 1953
Santa Margarita Sub

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4722
  • Respect: +1665
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2017, 12:27:33 PM »
0
I LEARNED from this experience and started using one of the corners on my miniature, precision flat-nose pliers to hold the joiner

@robert3985, exactly which kind of pliers?  Do you have a link?

(I am always interested in good tools  :ashat:)

Thanks,
Ed

Altoona

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 153
  • Respect: +9
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2017, 01:34:24 PM »
0

MK

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3969
  • Respect: +720

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2990
  • Respect: +1254
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #20 on: January 28, 2017, 02:22:54 AM »
0
@robert3985, exactly which kind of pliers?  Do you have a link?

(I am always interested in good tools  :ashat:)

Thanks,
Ed

Ed @ednadolski , here's the link for my flat-nose pliers: https://www.craftsman.com/products/craftsman-professional-5-in-flat-nose-pliers?taxon_id=1840

Here's the link for my needle-nose pliers: https://www.craftsman.com/products/craftsman-professional-5-1-2-in-needle-nose-pliers?taxon_id=1840

The box joint is part of what makes 'em "precision"....

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore

rodsup9000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 991
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +644
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #21 on: January 28, 2017, 08:58:23 AM »
0
 I, like Bob, have used ME track and joiners since back in the "Railcraft" days. I've always used the ME joiners.

 Once I have the track ready for the joiners, I use a small triangle file







 and file the end of the rails. In the photo, you can see on the right side of the left rail how I have filed the bottom flange. Now do that to the other side of the rail.







 I then use the end grain of a piece of wood (in this case, benchwork of the layout) and push the joiner on. Then if I have trouble getting the next piece of track to go into the joiner, I just pull it off and turn it 180 degrees.








 
Rodney

My Feather River Canyon in N-scale
http://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=31585.0

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6635
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1569
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #22 on: January 28, 2017, 01:03:09 PM »
0
Shouldn't they just fit w/o all of the filing and tools? 
I mean, really.  They should just slide on with a little effort to fit snugly, but slide on nonetheless.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


rodsup9000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 991
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +644
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #23 on: January 28, 2017, 01:42:39 PM »
0
Shouldn't they just fit w/o all of the filing and tools? 
I mean, really.  They should just slide on with a little effort to fit snugly, but slide on nonetheless.

 Not really. As the rail is cut, it does leaves burrs and that is what causes the joiners not to easily slide on. Even as the track is produced, the machine leaves burrs.

 I've done the file method since I started back in '67 in HO.
Rodney

My Feather River Canyon in N-scale
http://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=31585.0

Angus Shops

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 747
  • Respect: +256
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2017, 04:19:42 PM »
0
If you're using their weathered track I find you've got to file the weathering down to clean nickel silver to get a good soldered joint, so a few extra passes with the file to help with the joiners isn't a problem.

Geoff

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9648
  • Respect: +1326
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #25 on: January 29, 2017, 01:43:56 AM »
0
Rodney:  That's exactly how I file mine, and again, I've been doing it since the 70s.  Even the early Atlas code 80 flextrack needed filing more often than not, if one wanted the joiners to fit right, and the joint to be smooth.

And, as Geoff says, if you use pre-weathered track, it has to be filed or scraped before soldering anyway, whether you use standard joiners or not.
N Kalanaga
Be well

PAL_Houston

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +17
Re: Micro-Engineering Code 55 Turnouts and Rail Joiners
« Reply #26 on: January 29, 2017, 11:52:03 AM »
0
Just buy Atlas joiners.

...and when you do, do NOT mix them up in the same box with ME joiners.
Regards,
Paul